Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] 9600 with ImagePrint vs PiezographyBW

Re: [Digital BW] 9600 with ImagePrint vs PiezographyBW

2003-12-10 by Alan.Huntley@cox.net

Hi Tom,

My current setup for B&W (as well as color) printing is: Epson 2200/UC inkset/IP 5.6 Lite. In my dark past, I did, at one point, use the old PiezoBW plugin and original Piezo inks. IMO, I would judge the IP B&W prints as being "as good as" or slightly better than the Piezo prints. I also like the fact that I can subtlely shift the print color tone (cool-to-warm) with IP. Please keep in mind that I'm comparing to the old Piezo system and not the new ICC profile system.

BTW, before Jon Cone introduced his new ICC Piezo system he publicly touted IP as being as good as his PiezoBW Pro system for the large format Epson printers. High praise indeeed, to my mind.

I really don't find usability to be an issue with either one. In fact, I really appreciate the layout window in IP and the simplicity of print quality selection. I understand that IP versions prior to 5.6 were not as intuitive; for instance, the proper inkset was not selected based on the paper profile. I only have experienced with the latest version.

Hope this helps.

Alan Huntley
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> From: "Tom Andrews" <tandrews@...>
> Date: 2003/12/10 Wed AM 11:46:17 EST
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] 9600 with ImagePrint vs PiezographyBW
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Lots of discussion in previous posts about the great B&W results from Ultrachrome 
> inks (2200, 7600, & 9600 printers) with an ImagePrint RIP.  I was wondering if 
> anyone has compared prints from this system to those printed using the quadtone 
> PiezographyBW ink sets.  How do these systems compare in results and use?

Re: [Digital BW] 9600 with ImagePrint vs PiezographyBW

2003-12-10 by Tom Baker

Alan  -
 
I obviously share your view.  The very precise control over the image tone in a b&w print is really nice.  There's on setting of the tint picker (about 60,60) that most viewers really like.  It reminds me of one of the warmer Agfa paper emulsions of yesteryear.  
 
I have used only IP5.5 and 5.6, so I don't know about the previous versions.  A new one is due out in January, but I haven't heard any details yet.
 
Tom Baker

Alan.Huntley@cox.net wrote:
Hi Tom,

My current setup for B&W (as well as color) printing is: Epson 2200/UC inkset/IP 5.6 Lite. In my dark past, I did, at one point, use the old PiezoBW plugin and original Piezo inks. IMO, I would judge the IP B&W prints as being "as good as" or slightly better than the Piezo prints. I also like the fact that I can subtlely shift the print color tone (cool-to-warm) with IP. Please keep in mind that I'm comparing to the old Piezo system and not the new ICC profile system.

BTW, before Jon Cone introduced his new ICC Piezo system he publicly touted IP as being as good as his PiezoBW Pro system for the large format Epson printers. High praise indeeed, to my mind.

I really don't find usability to be an issue with either one. In fact, I really appreciate the layout window in IP and the simplicity of print quality selection. I understand that IP versions prior to 5.6 were not as intuitive; for instance, the proper inkset was not selected based on the paper profile. I only have experienced with the latest version.

Hope this helps.

Alan Huntley

> 
> From: "Tom Andrews" <tandrews@...>
> Date: 2003/12/10 Wed AM 11:46:17 EST
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] 9600 with ImagePrint vs PiezographyBW
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Lots of discussion in previous posts about the great B&W results from Ultrachrome 
> inks (2200, 7600, & 9600 printers) with an ImagePrint RIP.  I was wondering if 
> anyone has compared prints from this system to those printed using the quadtone 
> PiezographyBW ink sets.  How do these systems compare in results and use?


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.