Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

UT-2 v. ImagePrint and QTR: Direct comparison?

UT-2 v. ImagePrint and QTR: Direct comparison?

2004-04-22 by chipcarterdc

Has anyone made a direct comparison (preferably of the same image on the 
same paper) of UT-2 versus ImagePrint or QTR w. Ultrachrome inks and, if so, 
what are your conclusions?  What differences (if any) do you see?  (You don't 
need to have printed it yourself -- your impressions would be useful if you've 
held a QTR or ImagePrint print in your hand next to a UT-2 print).

I've run a search and can't find any threads from anyone who has done a 
direct comparison themselves.

Re: UT-2 v. ImagePrint and QTR: Direct comparison?

2004-04-23 by Roy Harrington

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "chipcarterdc" 
<chipcarterdc@h...> wrote:
> Has anyone made a direct comparison (preferably of the same image on the 
> same paper) of UT-2 versus ImagePrint or QTR w. Ultrachrome inks and, if so, 
> what are your conclusions?  What differences (if any) do you see?  (You don't 
> need to have printed it yourself -- your impressions would be useful if you've 
> held a QTR or ImagePrint print in your hand next to a UT-2 print).
> 
> I've run a search and can't find any threads from anyone who has done a 
> direct comparison themselves.

I've started to make some comparison prints with several different printers,
inksets and software.  I've got a good collection going but have a way to go.

I have directly compared a QTR print and an IP (demo) print on a 7600.
The basic quality is identical, I doubt anybody could pick them out in
a blind test.  When you put a high power loupe to them naturally you can
see the dot patterns ie the dither.  They both appear nicely pseudo-
random but you do get a feeling they are different but equivalent.

Roy

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.