Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

[Digital BW] Problem with Epson 2200 driver + Monitoring on a 2100.

[Digital BW] Problem with Epson 2200 driver + Monitoring on a 2100.

2004-05-10 by Thierry Burlot

Hello all,

Last night I tried to install the 2200 driver on my 2100. Everything was fine but the Epson monitor did not work.
So I installed it (latest version from epson.com) and then the printer did not want to print anymore.
I had to re-install the 2100 drivers to have it work again.

Does anyone have a tip for this : having the 2200 driver + printer monitoring working on a 2100. 

Thanks

Regards,
Thierry.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Problem with Epson 2200 driver + Monitoring on a 2100.

2004-05-10 by Daniel Staver

> Does anyone have a tip for this : having the 2200 driver + 
> printer monitoring working on a 2100. 

I'm not entirely sure whether that's possible. I have both drivers, and
both drivers print just fine, but I only get the status monitor with the
2100 driver.

I'm not sure why you need the status monitor? If you want to check ink
levels you could just enter the driver properties or use the SSC Service
Utility
for Epson Stylus Printers available here:

http://www.ssclg.com/epsone.shtml


--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no

Re: [Digital BW] Problem with Epson 2200 driver + Monitoring on a 2100.

2004-05-11 by Steve Kale

Why would you want to use the 2200 driver?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Thierry Burlot" <thierryburlot@...>
Organization: Green Room
Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 20:34:26 +0200
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Digital BW] Problem with Epson 2200 driver + Monitoring on a 2100.

Hello all, 

Last night I tried to install the 2200 driver on my 2100. Everything was
fine but the Epson monitor did not work.
So I installed it (latest version from epson.com) and then the printer did
not want to print anymore.
I had to re-install the 2100 drivers to have it work again.

Does anyone have a tip for this : having the 2200 driver + printer
monitoring working on a 2100.

Thanks 

Regards, 
Thierry.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Problem with Epson 2200 driver + Monitoring on a 2100.

2004-05-12 by Thierry Burlot

yes that's right. BO printing is not possible with the 2100 driver. 
Also it is not possible to print at 2880dpi with EEM paper.

BTW Thanks Daniel for the "SSC Service Utility" link. I just needed to get the ink level from my 2100.
Now my problem is solved.

Regards,

Thierry Burlot
http://www.tinyurl.com/2m89b






  >> Why would you want to use the 2200 driver?

  >It allows you to print BO with the photo black ink installed, the 2100
  >driver doesn't.

  --
  >Daniel Staver
  >http://daniel.staver.no





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Problem with Epson 2200 driver + Monitoring on a 2100.

2004-05-12 by Steve Kale

BO is possible ­ just not with Photo black installed.  Matt black is not a
problem ­ so if you are printing to EEM then the 2100 driver is ok.  Also
printing at 2880dpi on matt paper is a waste of time.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Thierry Burlot" <thierryburlot@...>
Organization: Green Room
Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 23:55:04 +0200
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Problem with Epson 2200 driver + Monitoring on a
2100.

 
yes that's right. BO printing is not possible with the 2100 driver.
Also it is not possible to print at 2880dpi with EEM paper.

BTW Thanks Daniel for the "SSC Service Utility" link. I just needed to get
the ink level from my 2100.
Now my problem is solved.

Regards, 

Thierry Burlot 
http://www.tinyurl.com/2m89b






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.