Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Limited Editions

Limited Editions

2004-05-22 by Richard Smallfield

Hi,
I've looked on the web without success so far, for guidelines on producing limited edition prints.

A friend of mine recommended only doing editions of 20 - or 25 max, which is what I've done so far. But I've seen that some people do editions as big as 500.

It would seem a shame to run out of a popular photo.

What are the rules about producing a new limited edition of the same photo, but in a different size?

thanks,
Richard
--
http://smallfield.vze.com
http://photos.smallfield.vze.com

   "To avoid criticism, do nothing, say nothing, be nothing."
   --Elbert Hubbard

Re: Limited Editions

2004-05-22 by Tom Andrews

Hi Richard,

It would only be ethical to produce a new limited edition of the same photo in 
a different size, IF you had let every buyer of your 1st limited edition know 
that this was what you planned to do AND if you spelled this out in your 
Certificate of Authenticity - IMHO.   An edition of 20-25 is a fine number if you 
are going to be selling your work for a good price in a high-end gallery.  So 
would 25-60.  If you are selling a popular image at art fairs, however, you will 
run out fast at this number.  If you haven't sold any of your editioned work 
yet, you may want to rethink this number for specific images.  There has been 
a lot of discussion on limited editions on this and many other related forums.  
Search more.  Cheers,

Tom Andrews
http://www.wildlandart.com


> Hi,
> I've looked on the web without success so far, for guidelines on producing 
limited edition prints.
> 
> A friend of mine recommended only doing editions of 20 - or 25 max, which 
is what I've done so far. But I've seen that some people do editions as big as 
500.
> 
> It would seem a shame to run out of a popular photo.
> 
> What are the rules about producing a new limited edition of the same 
photo, but in a different size?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> thanks,
> Richard
> --
> http://smallfield.vze.com
> http://photos.smallfield.vze.com

Limited Editions

2004-05-22 by HPA

I print for other photographers and see a lot of mixed results with limited
editions.  In short, if your work is the kind of pictures that are likely to
sell well, I would recommend against limited editions.  The reason why is it
kills your best shots.  For example, one photographer that I print for
serial numbers each print and they are all open editions, his best shot sold
now 445 copies.  Second best sold 152, third best sold 78, he has about 25
pictures that sold between a dozen and fifty, the other 10,000 pictures have
sold only once or twice if at all.  Overall, the gallery sells between
$5000-$10000 per month of his work. My point is that a limited edition would
have lost money for this photographer.  In another example, the photographer
sells only a few copies of any photo, and so a limited edition works well
for her because it enhances the value and sales are unlikely to ever be
strong for any particular image.

The difference between these two photographers are subject matter and price.
They are printed the same way by the same person (me) and are both framed in
Nielson 11s and sold by similar galleries only a few blocks away from each
other.  The person doing the open editions sells fine art photos of
in-demand subject matter, mostly landscapes of the state's major
attractions.  The retail price of these prints are right on the general
market average in this region, which is retail $600 for a framed 20x24.  The
artist who has limited editions gets over $1000 per print but sells only one
every few months at most.  In her case, limited editions make her money.

In short, if you want to sell small editions and then kill the picture,
limited editions make sense.  OTOH, if you make the kinds of pictures that
are capable of selling in quantity, then numbered open editions will work
better. 

Galleries generally advise artists to do limited editions.  I would take
this advice with a little salt because they have a conflict of interest when
giving it.  Galleries want artists to produce small editions sized to what
they can handle.  They don't want you signing with other galleries in other
parts of the country or selling direct on the internet.  If your work is
strong, it will sell itself, and you may not wish to be encumbered by
previous agreements and limitations that hamper your career.

good luck
Tom Robinson

Re: [Digital BW] Limited Editions

2004-05-24 by J Vee

Richard, this is a problem that I have struggled with for about 30 years.
The ³Lenswork² magazine has recently had some very incisive editorials about
this (Brooks Jenson).  Basically, IMHO all limited edition numbers in
photography are somewhat misleading, i.e. The ³plate² doesn¹t wear out etc.
That said, it is hard to sell prints without editioning them.  Thus, I have
gone from strictly limited editions to simply numbering prints consecutively
(no ed.) to producing editions of fifty, but with consecutively numbered
editions.  So one has print  number 12/50  Ed. #3, for instance.  I do
outline this and the existence of other sizes in my certificate of
authenticity though.  J Vee

On 5/21/04 7:29 PM, "Richard Smallfield" <r.smallfield@...>
wrote:

> 
> What are the rules about producing a new limited edition of the same photo,
> but in a different size?



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.