Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Permajet Alpha, Omega?

Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-14 by ptang1uk

Has anyone here used either of these papers? How do they compare 
image wise with Hahnemuhle Photo Rag? I have been using the latter 
with Epson 2100/Ultrachrome but am worried about some negative 
permanence reports, esp on the Livick.com site.

Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-14 by virtuallygrey

I've recently started using both - limited to A4 size so far - with 
my 2100 and UT7 inks.  They're both 310 gsm, they're both slightly 
smoother than Photorag.  The Omega is very slightly whiter than 
Photorag whilst the Alpha is a very pale cream.  To me they're 
identical but for the colour difference.

I like them both and plan to use them along with Photorag - 
particularly for sales.  DMax seems excellent to my eye, but that's 
the only measuring equipment I've got.

I've seen somewhere in this group a reference that they (or at last 
the Alpha) don't use optical brighteners, although you'd have to 
check that for yourself.  So presumably no flaking - although I've 
never experienced that with Photorag.  As for permanence - who 
knows.  But as 100% cotton rag they should be (?) up there with the 
best.

Steve Gledhill
http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ptang1uk" 
<michael@m...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Has anyone here used either of these papers? How do they compare 
> image wise with Hahnemuhle Photo Rag? I have been using the latter 
> with Epson 2100/Ultrachrome but am worried about some negative 
> permanence reports, esp on the Livick.com site.

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-14 by Paul Roark

Alpha is OBA free.  Delta has some OBAs.  Omega, I thought, has some, but
under a black light (not the best one in the world) there seems to be very
little if any in it.  

Omega has a dmax of 1.67.  Each batch of paper seems to vary a bit, but all
three of the new PermaJet papers are consistently between PhotoRag (1.71)
and EEM (1.64-5), which is excellent.  

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 

_________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: virtuallygrey [mailto:stephengledhill@...] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:44 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

I've recently started using both - limited to A4 size so far - with 
my 2100 and UT7 inks.  They're both 310 gsm, they're both slightly 
smoother than Photorag.  The Omega is very slightly whiter than 
Photorag whilst the Alpha is a very pale cream.  To me they're 
identical but for the colour difference.

I like them both and plan to use them along with Photorag - 
particularly for sales.  DMax seems excellent to my eye, but that's 
the only measuring equipment I've got.

I've seen somewhere in this group a reference that they (or at last 
the Alpha) don't use optical brighteners, although you'd have to 
check that for yourself.  So presumably no flaking - although I've 
never experienced that with Photorag.  As for permanence - who 
knows.  But as 100% cotton rag they should be (?) up there with the 
best.

Steve Gledhill
http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ptang1uk" 
<michael@m...> wrote:
> Has anyone here used either of these papers? How do they compare 
> image wise with Hahnemuhle Photo Rag? I have been using the latter 
> with Epson 2100/Ultrachrome but am worried about some negative 
> permanence reports, esp on the Livick.com site.




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-14 by ptang1uk

Many thanks for the quick responses. Both Omega and Alpha sound good
options. The only reason I'm looking for a possible Photorag
replacement is the pretty awful longevity result on www.livick.com
I work in mono and colour and spray my prints with Lyson Print guard
before framing behind ordinary glass. Unfortunately the only reports
Show quoted textHide quoted text

on Permajet papers that I have seen are from Perma themselves, using
their own inks...
Michael Woolley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Alpha is OBA free. Delta has some OBAs. Omega, I thought, has
some, but
> under a black light (not the best one in the world) there seems to
be very
> little if any in it.
>
> Omega has a dmax of 1.67. Each batch of paper seems to vary a
bit, but all
> three of the new PermaJet papers are consistently between PhotoRag
(1.71)
> and EEM (1.64-5), which is excellent.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
> _________________________________
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: virtuallygrey [mailto:stephengledhill@y...]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:44 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?
>
> I've recently started using both - limited to A4 size so far -
with
> my 2100 and UT7 inks. They're both 310 gsm, they're both slightly
> smoother than Photorag. The Omega is very slightly whiter than
> Photorag whilst the Alpha is a very pale cream. To me they're
> identical but for the colour difference.
>
> I like them both and plan to use them along with Photorag -
> particularly for sales. DMax seems excellent to my eye, but
that's
> the only measuring equipment I've got.
>
> I've seen somewhere in this group a reference that they (or at
last
> the Alpha) don't use optical brighteners, although you'd have to
> check that for yourself. So presumably no flaking - although I've
> never experienced that with Photorag. As for permanence - who
> knows. But as 100% cotton rag they should be (?) up there with
the
> best.
>
> Steve Gledhill
> http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ptang1uk"
> <michael@m...> wrote:
> > Has anyone here used either of these papers? How do they compare
> > image wise with Hahnemuhle Photo Rag? I have been using the
latter
> > with Epson 2100/Ultrachrome but am worried about some negative
> > permanence reports, esp on the Livick.com site.
>
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
resources as
> they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting
this same
> page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of
digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules
and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group
Owner and
> Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files
section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER"
AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU
> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
EXEMPLARY
> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF
THE "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
ADVISED OF THE
> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE
INABILITY
> TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED
ACCESS TO OR
> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR
CONDUCT OF ANY
> THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY
OTHER
> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-14 by Steve Kale

You should consider trying Lascaux spray instead of Lyson Print Guard for
your matt paper prints.  The Lyson spray knocks dmax quite a lot.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: ptang1uk <michael@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:37:07 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?
> 
> Many thanks for the quick responses. Both Omega and Alpha sound good
> options. The only reason I'm looking for a possible Photorag
> replacement is the pretty awful longevity result on www.livick.com
> I work in mono and colour and spray my prints with Lyson Print guard
> before framing behind ordinary glass. Unfortunately the only reports
> on Permajet papers that I have seen are from Perma themselves, using
> their own inks...
> Michael Woolley
>

[Digital BW] Lascaux B72 was Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-14 by borden_jonathan

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale 
<stevekale@b...> wrote:
> You should consider trying Lascaux spray instead of Lyson Print 
Guard for
> your matt paper prints.  The Lyson spray knocks dmax quite a lot.
> 
> 
I am interested in using Lascaux. I wonder how it might work with 
glossy prints and Ultrachrome and/or MIS inks e.g. Eboni?

1) As a coating would it reduce metamerism?
2) Is so, might it increase dMax for the matte black inks when used 
with glossy materials?

Jonathan

RE: [Digital BW] Lascaux B72 was Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-14 by Paul Roark

>Steve Kale  wrote:
>> You should consider trying Lascaux spray instead of 
>>Lyson Print Guard for your matt paper prints.  
>>The Lyson spray knocks dmax quite a lot.

Jonathan wrote:

>I am interested in using Lascaux. I wonder how it might work with 
>glossy prints and Ultrachrome and/or MIS inks e.g. Eboni?

On glossy prints Lascaux is less effective (at least on a per-coating basis)
at reducing bronzing than is the Lyson Print Guard.

In my fade tests, the UltraChromes got a significantly increased life from
PremierArt Print Shield, which I suspect is the same as the Lyson Product.
(PremierArt denies this.)  The Lascaux did not improve UltraChrome
lightfastness as much (again, on a per-coat basis).

>1) As a coating would it reduce metamerism?

I doubt any coating can do this.

>2) Is so, might it increase dMax for the matte black inks when used 
>with glossy materials?

I don't recommend matte black with glossy papers, but some people have been
using them with sprays for some time.  With Photo K the sprays do increase
the dmax on glossy paper.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

[Digital BW] Lascaux B72 was Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-15 by johnglodge

Lascaux does supply an Acrylic transparent UV varnish (matt or gloss)
that is water-thinnable. This is not the same as the solvent based 
Fixativ. Can't say I've actually seen it though I find the Fixativ 
fine to work with.

...John
  
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> >Steve Kale  wrote:
> >> You should consider trying Lascaux spray instead of 
> >>Lyson Print Guard for your matt paper prints.  
> >>The Lyson spray knocks dmax quite a lot.
> 
> Jonathan wrote:
> 
> >I am interested in using Lascaux. I wonder how it might work with 
> >glossy prints and Ultrachrome and/or MIS inks e.g. Eboni?
> 
> On glossy prints Lascaux is less effective (at least on a per-
coating basis)
> at reducing bronzing than is the Lyson Print Guard.
> 
> In my fade tests, the UltraChromes got a significantly increased 
life from
> PremierArt Print Shield, which I suspect is the same as the Lyson 
Product.
> (PremierArt denies this.)  The Lascaux did not improve UltraChrome
> lightfastness as much (again, on a per-coat basis).
> 
> >1) As a coating would it reduce metamerism?
> 
> I doubt any coating can do this.
> 
> >2) Is so, might it increase dMax for the matte black inks when 
used 
> >with glossy materials?
> 
> I don't recommend matte black with glossy papers, but some people 
have been
> using them with sprays for some time.  With Photo K the sprays do 
increase
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> the dmax on glossy paper.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com

[Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-20 by Chris Hargens

Are these papers available yet in the US? I did a web search and 
could only locate UK vendors.

Chris Hargens

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Alpha is OBA free.  Delta has some OBAs.  Omega, I thought, has 
some, but
> under a black light (not the best one in the world) there seems to 
be very
> little if any in it.  
> 
> Omega has a dmax of 1.67.  Each batch of paper seems to vary a bit, 
but all
> three of the new PermaJet papers are consistently between PhotoRag 
(1.71)
> and EEM (1.64-5), which is excellent.  
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
> _________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: virtuallygrey [mailto:stephengledhill@y...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:44 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?
> 
> I've recently started using both - limited to A4 size so far - with 
> my 2100 and UT7 inks.  They're both 310 gsm, they're both slightly 
> smoother than Photorag.  The Omega is very slightly whiter than 
> Photorag whilst the Alpha is a very pale cream.  To me they're 
> identical but for the colour difference.
> 
> I like them both and plan to use them along with Photorag - 
> particularly for sales.  DMax seems excellent to my eye, but that's 
> the only measuring equipment I've got.
> 
> I've seen somewhere in this group a reference that they (or at last 
> the Alpha) don't use optical brighteners, although you'd have to 
> check that for yourself.  So presumably no flaking - although I've 
> never experienced that with Photorag.  As for permanence - who 
> knows.  But as 100% cotton rag they should be (?) up there with the 
> best.
> 
> Steve Gledhill
> http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ptang1uk" 
> <michael@m...> wrote:
> > Has anyone here used either of these papers? How do they compare 
> > image wise with Hahnemuhle Photo Rag? I have been using the 
latter 
> > with Epson 2100/Ultrachrome but am worried about some negative 
> > permanence reports, esp on the Livick.com site.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital 
B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
Owner and
> Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files 
section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
LIABLE TO YOU
> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR 
EXEMPLARY
> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF 
THE  "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED 
OF THE
> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE 
INABILITY
> TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED 
ACCESS TO OR
> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR 
CONDUCT OF ANY
> THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY 
OTHER
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

2004-09-22 by Paul Roark

To obtain PermaJet papers -- Alpha (OBA free), Omega (some brighteners), &
Delta (more brighteners, but still less than most) -- or to find out where
they can be purchased, call Jobo at 800-664-0344.  Usually Mark is the
person to contact.  If he's out (like now) ask for Ricke.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com
_______________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Hargens [mailto:chargens@...] 
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 10:52 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?

Are these papers available yet in the US? I did a web search and 
could only locate UK vendors.

Chris Hargens

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Alpha is OBA free.  Delta has some OBAs.  Omega, I thought, has 
some, but
> under a black light (not the best one in the world) there seems to 
be very
> little if any in it.  
> 
> Omega has a dmax of 1.67.  Each batch of paper seems to vary a bit, 
but all
> three of the new PermaJet papers are consistently between PhotoRag 
(1.71)
> and EEM (1.64-5), which is excellent.  
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
> _________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: virtuallygrey [mailto:stephengledhill@y...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:44 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Permajet Alpha, Omega?
> 
> I've recently started using both - limited to A4 size so far - with 
> my 2100 and UT7 inks.  They're both 310 gsm, they're both slightly 
> smoother than Photorag.  The Omega is very slightly whiter than 
> Photorag whilst the Alpha is a very pale cream.  To me they're 
> identical but for the colour difference.
> 
> I like them both and plan to use them along with Photorag - 
> particularly for sales.  DMax seems excellent to my eye, but that's 
> the only measuring equipment I've got.
> 
> I've seen somewhere in this group a reference that they (or at last 
> the Alpha) don't use optical brighteners, although you'd have to 
> check that for yourself.  So presumably no flaking - although I've 
> never experienced that with Photorag.  As for permanence - who 
> knows.  But as 100% cotton rag they should be (?) up there with the 
> best.
> 
> Steve Gledhill
> http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ptang1uk" 
> <michael@m...> wrote:
> > Has anyone here used either of these papers? How do they compare 
> > image wise with Hahnemuhle Photo Rag? I have been using the 
latter 
> > with Epson 2100/Ultrachrome but am worried about some negative 
> > permanence reports, esp on the Livick.com site.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital 
B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
Owner and
> Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files 
section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
LIABLE TO YOU
> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR 
EXEMPLARY
> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
> GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF 
THE  "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED 
OF THE
> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE 
INABILITY
> TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED 
ACCESS TO OR
> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR 
CONDUCT OF ANY
> THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY 
OTHER
> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.