Paul, With respect to what you wrote, in general I
couldn't agree more. (I've used both ColorVision's
Profiler Pro and Monaco EZ Color).
The only new "wrinkle" is that for Epson R800 owners,
the Epson media profiles for Epson papers are very
good.
Howard
--- Paul Holman <pholman@...> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> > looking for an alternative I can afford right now.
> Does anyone have
> > direct experience with Profile Prism they can
> relate? My primary
> > need is to be able to produce a fairly linear
> profile with a
> > densitometer, if that is possible.
>
> Don't bother.
> Whilst a few people report success with PP it seems
> to be very much a
> matter of luck, rather than precision. Most of the
> people I know who
> have tried it have spent a VERY LONG time working by
> trial and error
> to produce 'decent' profiles. What works well for
> one person also
> doesn't seem to work for someone else with the same
> kit, so
> variability of hardware is a serious issue.
> I spent months trying to make profiles for my Epson
> printers, I spent
> a lot buying new scanners others recommended and
> trying different
> techniques, but with virtual no success. I did make
> a couple of
> pictorially acceptable profiles for non standard
> papers, but in
> reality they were little better than using a default
> Epson profiles
> with a different paper, often much worse.
> If your time is worth anything and you don't want
> colour management to
> become a hobby in itself, don't waste it with PP,
> just buy a custom
> printer profile from someone using decent kit.
>
> Sorry not to be more positive about this, but you
> can waste a lot of
> time and money on PP, I did.
>
> Paul Holman
> www.paulholman.com
>
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com