Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

2000P for "toned" prints (was re: 2200 vs. 2000P)

2000P for "toned" prints (was re: 2200 vs. 2000P)

2004-10-15 by John Broski

Hi,
I'm just curious - sometimes I print with the duotones or quadtones that 
come with Photoshop - how good a job does the 2000P do with these? Is 
metamerism marked when printing toned BW prints like this?

many thanks in advance,
Richard
--

Hi Richard,

Yes, in my experience metamerism is still pretty ugly on toned prints.  The 
toning does disguise the metamerism a bit, and I suppose a strong enough 
tone would hide it altogether.  But it would take more than the "normal" 
warming or cooling effects that B&W photographers generally favor.  Even 
full-color prints can show noticeable metamerism in neutral areas using the 
original pigment inks which shipped in the 2000.

I'm a teacher (grade-school science), and I used to amaze my students by 
showing them a neutral grayscale print under tungsten light, then carrying 
it out into the sunlight.  Magic!  It would turn green before their very 
eyes!  (Of course, for a ten-year-old, this is an excellent feature, not a 
problem!)

Variable-tone B&W inks (like UT2's) are definitely the way to go, if the 
tones you desire are within their range.

John

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.