2000P for "toned" prints (was re: 2200 vs. 2000P)
2004-10-15 by John Broski
Hi, I'm just curious - sometimes I print with the duotones or quadtones that come with Photoshop - how good a job does the 2000P do with these? Is metamerism marked when printing toned BW prints like this? many thanks in advance, Richard -- Hi Richard, Yes, in my experience metamerism is still pretty ugly on toned prints. The toning does disguise the metamerism a bit, and I suppose a strong enough tone would hide it altogether. But it would take more than the "normal" warming or cooling effects that B&W photographers generally favor. Even full-color prints can show noticeable metamerism in neutral areas using the original pigment inks which shipped in the 2000. I'm a teacher (grade-school science), and I used to amaze my students by showing them a neutral grayscale print under tungsten light, then carrying it out into the sunlight. Magic! It would turn green before their very eyes! (Of course, for a ten-year-old, this is an excellent feature, not a problem!) Variable-tone B&W inks (like UT2's) are definitely the way to go, if the tones you desire are within their range. John