Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] OT-Nikon D1X Ultimate Print Quality?

Re: [Digital BW] OT-Nikon D1X Ultimate Print Quality?

2001-11-12 by Tim Mimpriss

Mike Krawitz wrote:
<<
I am considering a Nikon D1X. I print entirely on my Epson 7000 using
Piezography and MIS Variable Tone Inks. Without the use of Genuine
Fractals, has anyone with this camera printed to 16x20?  How is the
quality of image compared to scanning 35mm, MF, or 4x5 film and then
printing.

In RAW mode this camera approached 6 megapixels. Is this the camera,
or is it still a waiting game for the first 10 megapixel camera?
>>
I too would love to know the answer to your question.

There is more to this equation than the mere pixel count. It is my
impression, correct me if I am wrong, that medium format professional backs,
even those giving as few 6 megapixel images, can give superb enlargements.
But are the images produced by the latest clutch of Canons and Nikons in the
same league?

If the comparison is with 35mm format, then the 'prosumer' digital is now
very close, if not actually there. But then most of us find that we need to
shoot in medium format or above to get high quality16x20 prints.

Tim
--
Tim Mimpriss

Re: [Digital BW] OT-Nikon D1X Ultimate Print Quality?

2001-11-12 by Rodolpho Pajuaba

> There is more to this equation than the mere pixel count. It is my
> impression, correct me if I am wrong, that medium format professional
backs,
> even those giving as few 6 megapixel images, can give superb enlargements.
> But are the images produced by the latest clutch of Canons and Nikons in
the
> same league?
>
I\ufffdm pretty sure that my oldie MV S2 can deliver better files than a D-30, or
a D-1X - even being 4Mpix against 6Mpix. I can enlarge my files up to
40cm-300 DPI, keeping details on shadows and highlights.
My 2 cents,
Rodolpho Pajuaba
www.pajuaba.com.br

Re: [Digital BW] OT-Nikon D1X Ultimate Print Quality?

2001-11-12 by Robert Morrison

Can't speak for the medium format backs...they are so much more expensive
and so less flexible, that I didn't really consider them in my options...but
I had a D1 and now have a D1x and would not enlarge an image to 16x20.  But
I also wouldn't enlarge a 35mm film image scanned at 4000dpi to 16x20
either.  I print mainly 8x10...and for that I think the D1x is great.  I've
also seen 11x14 images that were very nice.  Your decision probably depends
on what kind of imagery you shoot and what you are doing with the final
prints.

Robert

On 11/12/01 1:58 AM, "Tim Mimpriss" <tim.mimpriss@...> wrote:

> Mike Krawitz wrote:
> <<
> I am considering a Nikon D1X. I print entirely on my Epson 7000 using
> Piezography and MIS Variable Tone Inks. Without the use of Genuine
> Fractals, has anyone with this camera printed to 16x20?  How is the
> quality of image compared to scanning 35mm, MF, or 4x5 film and then
> printing.
> 
> In RAW mode this camera approached 6 megapixels. Is this the camera,
> or is it still a waiting game for the first 10 megapixel camera?
>>> 
> I too would love to know the answer to your question.
> 
> There is more to this equation than the mere pixel count. It is my
> impression, correct me if I am wrong, that medium format professional backs,
> even those giving as few 6 megapixel images, can give superb enlargements.
> But are the images produced by the latest clutch of Canons and Nikons in the
> same league?
> 
> If the comparison is with 35mm format, then the 'prosumer' digital is now
> very close, if not actually there. But then most of us find that we need to
> shoot in medium format or above to get high quality16x20 prints.
> 
> Tim
> --
> Tim Mimpriss
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 

----------------------
Robert Morrison
rmorrison@...

310-397-2704

4131 Bledsoe Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90066

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.