Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Scanners - Imacon Photo Flextight vs. SprintScan 120

Re: [Digital BW] Scanners - Imacon Photo Flextight vs. SprintScan 120

2001-11-20 by jennifer drucker

What is the maximum scan area?  Does it scan up to 4x5?

Thx!
- Jennifer Drucker


http://www.jdrucker.com
jdrucker@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: hslavitt@... 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:40 PM
  Subject: [Digital BW] Scanners - Imacon Photo Flextight vs. SprintScan 120


  Just thought I'd share my experiences and impressions with the 
  Polaroid SprintScan 120 and Imacon Photo Flextight for those still 
  making similar purchasing decisions. I purchased an SS120 in July, 
  but returned it after testing it for about a week (well within the 
  return period) primarily because Polaroid had, in the interim, 
  announced financial difficulties and I didn't want to risk being 
  stuck with an unserviceable scanner. Overall, when I returned it, I 
  thought the SS120 was a very good value and, on balance, a capable 
  machine (but wait until you read what I say about the Imacon, which 
  is significantly better). My biggest problems with the SS120 were 
  significant noise, especially in the highlights, color fringing from 
  time to time (only visible at 100% view, and not in all cases, and 
  not consistent, and barely noticeable, if at all, on final print 
  outs, although it does degrade sharpness), and the film holders 
  cutting off the edges of the film and decreasing useable film space 
  by 5-10%. I used the Silverfast software with the SS120. 

  After waiting 3 months + for the Nikon 8000 ED, I received a new 
  Imacon Photo yesterday. (I finally got a call that my Nikon was in 
  stock the same day I had decided to order the Imacon and just 
  cancelled the Nikon order.) The Imacon scans are simply gorgeous. In 
  a different category from the SS120, IMHO. Every part of every frame 
  is SHARP (I used USM setting at -120 which is equivalent to no 
  sharpening for the Imacon). The SS120 scans were sharp too. The 
  Imacon scans, however, just have a different type of "presence." The 
  film holder design is a pleasure to work with and, in my limited 
  experience thus far (and also from what many others have told me) 
  works as intended to get sharp scans time and again.  Barely a need 
  for sharpening, if at all, of 3200 dpi scans.  Noise is significantly 
  lower than with the SS120. Color gradations are smooth. No color 
  fringing that I can see. The Flexcolor Imacon software is powerful 
  and has a very intuitive interface. The Imacon is really a pleasure. 
  Although it only scans at 3200 dpi as opposed to 4000 dpi, I'd any 
  day take the Imacon's 3200 dpi over the SS120's 4000 dpi, even for 35 
  mm.  For anyone considering the various medium format options, if you 
  can afford $5,000 for the Imacon (after rebate; good through the end 
  of November as I understand it but you should check with Imacon), I'd 
  recommend you rethink it before spending the money on one of the 
  competing models. 

  BTW, I am scanning only color transparencies, almost all Velvia and 
  Astia, 35 mm and 6 cm x 9 cm (haven't scanned the medium format yet 
  on the Imacon because I'm waiting to receive a custom holder from 
  Denmark).

  BTW, the Imacon is not fast.  A 35 mm slide at 3200 dpi 16 bit takes 
  about 7 minutes to scan.  Much longer than the Polaroid.  However, 
  the software is very well behaved (at least on a Mac) and only 
  requires at maximum 192 MB of RAM.  Therefore, it's easy to do other 
  Photoshop work at the same time that the scanner is working.  The 
  machine is very well constructed and, compared to the noisy SS120, is 
  very quiet during the scanning.  The Imacon does not have digital 
  ice, which I thought would bother me, but the scans are so nice, that 
  I don't mind looking through the file and dusting it; I'm also taking 
  extra precautions to absolutely clean all the dust possible off the 
  slide before scanning (i.e. special Hepa dust fan/filter for the 
  workroom, and special dust cleaning antistatic brush), which 
  substantially decreases dusting time.  $5,000 for the scanner doesn't 
  seem as exorbitant as it did to me a few days ago.  (BTW, about 3-6 
  months ago the market price was $10,000.)


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.