Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

? for Paul

? for Paul

2005-05-04 by dlruckus

Hi Paul.

When you were developing your UT formulas you listed an experimental
base for the inks. I believe it was a mix of H2O/glycerol at 4:3.
Would I be mistaken in assuming that base mix could be used as a
universal flush solution for switching between the old pig
types(color/VM's etc) and the new UT/UC etc types and Eboni?

Thanks.
Duane

RE: [Digital BW] ? for Paul

2005-05-05 by Paul Roark

Duane,

I think that formula might work.  But, I've also learned that some of the
flushing fluid is more watered down to lower the viscosity.  This allows it
to get into and through, for example damper screens, that the higher
viscosity fluids will not get through as easily.  So, if you want a cheap
flushing fluid, you might want to dilute my "UC base" a bit more.

Also, note that the base I found compatible with UC inks is not what is used
for the UT inks.  That requires a specific base from the pigment supplier.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> dlruckus
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 8:47 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] ? for Paul
> 
> 
> Hi Paul.
> 
> When you were developing your UT formulas you listed an experimental
> base for the inks. I believe it was a mix of H2O/glycerol at 4:3.
> Would I be mistaken in assuming that base mix could be used as a
> universal flush solution for switching between the old pig
> types(color/VM's etc) and the new UT/UC etc types and Eboni?
> 
> Thanks.
> Duane
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: ? for Paul

2005-05-05 by dlruckus

Thanks Paul.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Duane,
> 
> I think that formula might work.  But, I've also learned that some
of the
> flushing fluid is more watered down to lower the viscosity.  This
allows it
> to get into and through, for example damper screens, that the higher
> viscosity fluids will not get through as easily.  So, if you want a
cheap
> flushing fluid, you might want to dilute my "UC base" a bit more.
> 
> Also, note that the base I found compatible with UC inks is not what
is used
> for the UT inks.  That requires a specific base from the pigment
supplier.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
>

Re: ? for Paul

2005-05-06 by yohnnyboy

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dlruckus" 
<dlruckus@y...> wrote:
> 
> Hi Paul.
> 
> When you were developing your UT formulas you listed an experimental
> base for the inks. I believe it was a mix of H2O/glycerol at 4:3.
> Would I be mistaken in assuming that base mix could be used as a
> universal flush solution for switching between the old pig
> types(color/VM's etc) and the new UT/UC etc types and Eboni?
> 
> Thanks.
> Duane
I have a followup question. I would like to do an experiment that 
requires diluting Epson OEM pigment inks in a 2000P and 2200 printer. 
Is the H2O/Glycerol mixture at 4:3 a good solvent to use to match the 
OEM base solvent?

RE: [Digital BW] Re: ? for Paul

2005-05-06 by Paul Roark

> ... I would like to do an experiment that
> requires diluting Epson OEM pigment inks in a 2000P and 2200 printer.
> Is the H2O/Glycerol mixture at 4:3 a good solvent to use to match the
> OEM base solvent?


That is what I made it for.  (But one does not dissolve pigments, the issue
is keeping them in suspension.)

What I did was see what chemicals were used in the OEM inks.  I wanted to
avoid incompatibilities.  So, with water and glycerin/glycerol being prime
ingredients, I figures this would do it.  The Epson base has some other
proprietary chemicals in it, but if the dilution is not too much -- say up
to 50% -- there should be enough of the others (wetting agents,
anti-bacterial agents, etc.) to continue to do their jobs adequately.

So, in my experiments, the mix above seems to work fine.  I have no real
long term experience with it.  In my fade tests with B&W inksets made with
Epson pigments, the MIS pigments did better. 

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> yohnnyboy
> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 4:54 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: ? for Paul
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dlruckus"
> <dlruckus@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Paul.
> >
> > When you were developing your UT formulas you listed an experimental
> > base for the inks. I believe it was a mix of H2O/glycerol at 4:3.
> > Would I be mistaken in assuming that base mix could be used as a
> > universal flush solution for switching between the old pig
> > types(color/VM's etc) and the new UT/UC etc types and Eboni?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Duane

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.