Legal (A3) flatbed scanner recommendation please
2005-05-30 by frankg_photo
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2005-05-30 by frankg_photo
I need to scan Black & White screened images from a 1920's photo book on the middle east. The original plates were large format and well reproduced. I need a scanner with a very good dmax and it should be larger than regular 8.5x11 (A4) size. Is there a particular model that is recommended and not too 'over the top'expensive ? thanks Frank
2005-05-30 by Ernst Dinkla
frankg_photo wrote: >I need to scan Black & White screened images from a 1920's photo book >on the middle east. The original plates were large format and well >reproduced. I need a scanner with a very good dmax and it should be >larger than regular 8.5x11 (A4) size. Is there a particular model that >is recommended and not too 'over the top'expensive ? > >thanks >Frank > > > You could check one of the Epson XL models, new or secondhand. There's not much dynamic range needed for scanning reflective originals. If you have the original glass plates and need to scan them it is a different story. I would be more worried about the screening if that has to be taken out. My Agfa Horizon Plus would be suited for this job too. It scans truly monochrome in one pass at 1200 PPI. There are newer versions of that A3 size scanner you can find secondhand. 2400 PPI as well. Agfa has no repair service worth mentioning so you are on your own when it doesn't work correct. If the prints in the book are perfect, without mildew etc then monochrome is the best way to go. If there are spots with different color, discoloration et the edges then color scanning is better as it is easier to retouch the scans afterwards. The one pass Epson models will be better then. Ernst
2005-05-30 by Historic Photo Archive
I was in this dilemma and I bought a used Umax Mirage IISE off ebay. The seller did not pack it well, didn't lock the carriages, so it was wrecked in shipment. However it seems he had a whole pallet load of them, and sent me another which was better packed, it worked fine after cleaning. Now I have a parts unit too. Bid was $75, shipping $40. I tried the Mustek, it was so bad I threw it away. Absolutely unuseable. I was thinking of a new Microtek, i have an Artixscan already and it is decent. Factory support is non-existent for out of warranty units, after 12 months your only option is to exchange for about half of list price plus shipping. They will not sell parts and they will not repair. In a way, I am glad that I had to learn how to fix my own scanner. The image has to go through two glass surfaces and three mirrors before it gets to the lens. Over a relatively short period of time these get dirty, you can look into your scanner and probably see the haze forming on the glass. I dismantled my Artixscan to fix the problem, a line in scan, caused by dirt on mirror in the carriage. I used tissue and denatured alcohol for cleaning the mirrors, this is what I was told to do by an expert camera repairman and is how he cleans mirrors on SLR cameras. So when i got the Umax A3 I took it apart and completely cleaned everything. It is SCSI, so I bought an old G3 for $50 to drive it, and put on an old version of Vuescan. For $115, it is the best bang for the buck, I saved thousands of dollars compared to buying a Microtek or Epson. I hear that Epson has stopped support of non-warranty scanners but I don't know. I don't think there is any value in buying a new scanner, the warranty is only 12 months, so if it breaks on its 14th month, like mine did, you are screwed. I'll do a little extra work and keep the savings. You have to learn to maintain the scanner anyway, no matter what you buy. -- Thomas Robinson http://www.historicphotoarchive.com
2005-05-30 by deanwork2003
We've had very good results with the larger and smaller Microtek and Epson flatbeds where I teach, and they get abused a lot. I'm sorry I don't know the model numbers. My brother had a new Umax that gave him nightmares, exchanged it for another one after months of poor support, and it was bad too. He finally got his money back and bought an Epson and has had nothing but good results with it, as I have with my smaller Epson that just keeps on ticking after 5 years. I got my money back on that thing in 2 months. The hard thing to know about buying a used scanner is if anyone has dropped it. That is always a gamble with Ebay and scanners or digital cameras. John --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Historic Photo Archive <tom@h...> wrote: > I was in this dilemma and I bought a used Umax Mirage IISE off ebay. The > seller did not pack it well, didn't lock the carriages, so it was wrecked in > shipment. However it seems he had a whole pallet load of them, and sent me > another which was better packed, it worked fine after cleaning. Now I have > a parts unit too. Bid was $75, shipping $40. > > I tried the Mustek, it was so bad I threw it away. Absolutely unuseable. > > I was thinking of a new Microtek, i have an Artixscan already and it is > decent. Factory support is non-existent for out of warranty units, after 12 > months your only option is to exchange for about half of list price plus > shipping. They will not sell parts and they will not repair. > > In a way, I am glad that I had to learn how to fix my own scanner. The > image has to go through two glass surfaces and three mirrors before it gets > to the lens. Over a relatively short period of time these get dirty, you > can look into your scanner and probably see the haze forming on the glass. > I dismantled my Artixscan to fix the problem, a line in scan, caused by dirt > on mirror in the carriage. I used tissue and denatured alcohol for cleaning > the mirrors, this is what I was told to do by an expert camera repairman and > is how he cleans mirrors on SLR cameras. > > So when i got the Umax A3 I took it apart and completely cleaned everything.
> It is SCSI, so I bought an old G3 for $50 to drive it, and put on an old > version of Vuescan. For $115, it is the best bang for the buck, I saved > thousands of dollars compared to buying a Microtek or Epson. I hear that > Epson has stopped support of non-warranty scanners but I don't know. I > don't think there is any value in buying a new scanner, the warranty is only > 12 months, so if it breaks on its 14th month, like mine did, you are > screwed. I'll do a little extra work and keep the savings. You have to > learn to maintain the scanner anyway, no matter what you buy. > -- > Thomas Robinson > http://www.historicphotoarchive.com
2005-05-30 by Djon
There are some incredible sub-$200 bargains in refurbs from Epson direct...that's where I got my 3200 a couple of years ago, saving big money... As to cleaning them...alcohol is a *terrible idea* as most types of alcohol leave deposits. I like Windex Glass and Surface Wipes (each sealed in a package, very wasteful but very effective)though regular Windex reportedly leaves a film. The best way to take care of flatbeds is to keep your hands off the surface and keep the scanner under a dust cover...if you do that, and if you don't keep the scanner in a dirty environment, and if you don't smoke around it, you virtually never have to clean. Djon > bought an Epson and has had nothing but > good results with it, as I have with my smaller Epson that just keeps on ticking
> after 5 years. > > John