Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] 'Color management' in PS or Advanced B/W driver[Mac, R2400]

Re: [Digital BW] 'Color management' in PS or Advanced B/W driver[Mac, R2400]

2005-06-03 by Sonny Taylor

Yep, just repeated it again with "No Color Management" and the dark 1/4 of the
strip is total black!

Turn CM on, and the scale is great. Something's wrong????

Thanks,

Sonny
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>     I have not done any test strips but the correct setting is no colour
>  management in PS CS2 or Same as Source in PS CS. In other words you just
>  send the file numbers only.
>
>
>  > From: Sonny Taylor
>  > Reply-To:
>  > Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:35:42 -0500 (CDT)
>  > To:
>  > Cc: , ,
>  >
>  > Subject: [Digital BW] "Color management" in PS or Advanced B/W
> driver [Mac,
>  > R2400]
>  >
>  > I wonder if anyone has any experience with the Advanced B/W driver, with
>  > respect to color management in PS? I am testing my R2400 and am trying to
>  > resolve a statement by Jeff Schewe in his excellent article in
> PhotoshopNews:
>  >
>  > http://photoshopnews.com/2005/05/16/epson-r2400-and-ultrachrome-k3-ink-report/
>  >
>  > where he states:
>  >
>  > "Printing out of Photoshop CS2, I used the Print with Preview dialog
> to set up
>  > the Photoshop to Epson driver hand off. Since the Advanced B&W Mode
> operates
>  > completely outside of normal color management parameters, in Photoshop you
>  > must turn off any color management".
>  >
>  > I wonder if I am doing something wrong. I am printing a B/W strip
> posterized
>  > to 31 segments. The first segment is 100% black, the second 97% black, and
> so
>  > on.
>  >
>  > Prior to reading Jeff's article, I did my tests with Color Management ON in
> PS
>  > and as I have always done with color; and the results with the Advanced B/W
>  > driver are excellent, except for some difficulty in differentiating the 100
>  > and 97% (they are both black, even though I can see a difference on my
>  > monitor; with a curve in PS, I can slightly open up the 100-97%).
>  >
>  > There is very little change in the shadows using Shadow Tonality in the
>  > Advanced B/W driver, from -25 to +25.
>  >
>  > After reading Jeff's article, I turned off CM, passing control to the
> Advanced
>  > B/W driver. The strips became all black for many more segments. I could not
>  > open them up using the driver.
>  >
>  > Am I missing something from Jeff's article? It seems that CM ON in PS still
>  > gives much better results  than I can achieve by the driver alone.
>  >
>  > Is there a better way to open up the deep blacks?
>  >
>  > Any comments will be greatly appreciated.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  >
>  > Sonny

Re: [Digital BW] 'Color management' in PS or Advanced B/W driver[Mac, R2400]

2005-06-03 by Steve Kale

Sonny

What paper and ink?  Can you measure the results? (My guess is matte paper
and matte ink.  I only have PK in my 4800 at the moment but if you follow
the Holy Moly 4800 thread you will see I have posted test strip results for
ISP paper and PK ink.)

Steve
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: Sonny Taylor <st@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:02:47 -0500 (CDT)
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 'Color management' in PS or Advanced B/W
> driver[Mac, R2400]
> 
> Yep, just repeated it again with "No Color Management" and the dark 1/4 of the
> strip is total black!
> 
> Turn CM on, and the scale is great. Something's wrong????
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sonny
>

Re: [Digital BW] 'Color management' in PS or Advanced B/W driver[Mac, R2400]

2005-06-03 by Sonny Taylor

Steve,

Heavyweight matte paper, Matte Black ink on a 2400. I cannot quantitatively measure the 
results, but I am comparing the density on my monitor with the print just using my eyes. 
With CM on with Advanced B/W driver, the print corresponds to my monitor. When I turn 
CM off in PS, I loose 1/4 of the strips which all become dense back.

And, the Shadow Tonality control in the Advanced B/W driver makes very little change 
from -25 to +25 (with or without CM in PS)

Strange, but the results using the wrong way (CM ON in PS) correspond great with my 
monitor.

Sonny
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> What paper and ink?  Can you measure the results? (My guess is matte paper
> and matte ink.  I only have PK in my 4800 at the moment but if you follow
> the Holy Moly 4800 thread you will see I have posted test strip results for
> ISP paper and PK ink.)
> 
> Steve

> > 
> > Yep, just repeated it again with "No Color Management" and the dark 1/4 of the
> > strip is total black!
> > 
> > Turn CM on, and the scale is great. Something's wrong????

Re: [Digital BW] 'Color management' in PS or Advanced B/W driver[Mac, R2400]

2005-06-09 by Steve Kale

Sonny

I have now had the chance to use the 4800 on matte paper.  I don't bother
with the shadow tonality control as you have much better control available
in PS.  I have no problem getting good visual separation on a 21 step wedge.
This is with a No Colour Adjustment workflow (ie Same as Source).  You have
to be very careful looking at something on the display vs print when you
don't have a soft proof up.  A lot of factors come to bear: the calibration
of the monitor, the monitor profile, the monitor's black point (almost
always much better than ink on matte paper), lighting of the print etc etc.
The narrower the dynamic range of the medium the smaller the increments in
tonality from one step to another.  It is difficult to suggest what might be
going wrong in your case.

Steve
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: Sonny Taylor <st@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:16:29 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 'Color management' in PS or Advanced B/W driver[Mac,
> R2400]
> 
> Steve,
> 
> Heavyweight matte paper, Matte Black ink on a 2400. I cannot quantitatively
> measure the 
> results, but I am comparing the density on my monitor with the print just
> using my eyes. 
> With CM on with Advanced B/W driver, the print corresponds to my monitor. When
> I turn 
> CM off in PS, I loose 1/4 of the strips which all become dense back.
> 
> And, the Shadow Tonality control in the Advanced B/W driver makes very little
> change 
> from -25 to +25 (with or without CM in PS)
> 
> Strange, but the results using the wrong way (CM ON in PS) correspond great
> with my 
> monitor.
> 
> Sonny
>  
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.