Re: [Digital BW] Linear Patterns was Re: Exchange Print Comparisons
2001-12-07 by Steadman Uhlich
I think you have a good suspicion point on the cause being related to the differences in dye vs. pigment on the surface (versus sinking in or spreading). Steadman
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: blueto49
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:14 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Linear Patterns was Re: Exchange Print Comparisons
I just wanted to add some observations of my own as to what Carolyn
is seeing. I think it is better to call them "linear artifacts" if
you will since I am not talking true banding that is easily seen at
normal viewing distances.
First, the linear patters, light or dark, only appear in smooth areas
of the image. Any kind of small pattern to the image will tend to
break them up and render them invisible even under magnification.
Even a moderate grain pattern will mask it. This may not be
completely true if the linear pattern is very strong but generally
explains why some prints show the pattern and others do no. This is
why Carolyn didn't see any linear artifacts in my print. It is very
grainy.
Second, the patterns tend to be limited to a certain tonal ranges. On
my 1200 with Piezo it was white or light toned banding as you
describe in the 25% to 50% tonal range. Using the Epson driver on my
1280 the banding is a dark or corduroy banding in the 60% to 80%
range. Using the Piezo driver (with the MIS VM inks installed) I get
the least banding with dark banding in the very darkest tones 90% to
100%. All of them have a faint look of linearity in the direction of
head travel.
Third, it is not always consistent. Sometimes it is there and
sometimes it is not. Some lucky people seem to have perfect printers
and get perfect Piezo prints without any banding ever. Very
frustrating situation.
Overall I think that the pattern or patterns are always there it is a
matter of factors that determine how noticeable they are. The nature
of the image and the paper used are big factors.
I think the reason we do not see these patterns with the OEM inks is
the difference between dyes and carbon pigment inks. The dyes may
blend together more smoothly and penetrate the paper more. The
pigment inks may not mix as well and sit mostly on top of the paper
revealing a "spray" pattern in the way the ink is laid down that was
never anticipated by the designers. Some one tried pigment inks in a
2000P a while ago and reported seeing less of this linear pattern
than in other printers.
Martin Wesley
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Carolyn Frayn
<carolyn@u...> wrote:
> Dear Group,
>
> I installed the Piezo system on my 1200 this week, after a couple of
> frustrating days with clogs and the banding due to the clogs it is
running
> well. My first clog free prints however had a different banding
pattern. I
> call this a linear pattern, more than a band. Feeling overly picky
about it
> I took out the print exchange package again.
>
> I went over the print exchange prints again with a loupe. I would
like to
> start a conversation about the various types of output I see and
perhaps
> have people varify what I'm seeing or tell me where I'm wrong.
>
> My first clog free piezo print has a linear, soft, fine band
throughout all
> tones and the whole print. It travels in the direction of the print
head. I
> do not get this banding on prints from this printer with OEM inks.
>
> Exchange prints:
>
> I see a similair banding in all prints from the 1160 using the cone
driver,
> whether they use cone inks or MIS. I do not see this pattern with
the Epson
> driver.
>
> I see the exact same linear pattern that I get in prints from the
1200 using
> the cone driver, so it is not just my 1200.
>
> I do not see this pattern in Mike's print from the Pro 7000 using
Cone's RIP
> but in this print I see a very very subtle weave pattern (sort of
banding in
> both directions but very soft and fine) that I find much nicer than
the
> 1200's banding.
>
> So is this banding? Is this print head travel? Is this only
avoidable if I
> were to go to the 7000 with Cone's Pro RIP? Or go back to the
Epson driver?
>
> I see no linear pattern in prints using MIS inks and the Epson
driver. I see
> very little in the way of dots from 1160's and 1280's using Paul's
or Wolf's
> curves but do see dot's in the 3000 prints without the loupe.
>
> I read somewhere that the software RIP Mike K was talking about is
being
> downsized for some of Epson's desktop printers. I wonder if this
will help
> for the smaller printers to achive dotless prints without the print
head
> pattern.
>
> I very much like the output from Martin's print, 1280 @ 2880 using
MIS VM.
> But I did not want to play with curves just yet...
>
> My output from the 2000P while displaying very subtle dots in the
> highlights, does not display any linear pattern at all... One day I
hope to
> use this printer for monochromes/duo/tritones with non OEM inks.
Darn that
> metamerism!
>
> If I migrate the Piezo BW system to a 1280 will this get rid of
this wee
> linear pattern (banding) issue?
>
> Curious,
> Carolyn
>
> PS: I do not find this at all objectionable from norman viewing
distance...
> and sorry for being so verbous. ;-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]