Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200

Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200

2005-07-01 by copal01

Hello
I have an 2100 lying around. Anyone using the new K3's in a 2100? I 
initially would use MIS spongeless cartridges and refill from 220ml 
cartridges. I know that I would need custom profiles.  Anyone doing 
this sort of thing or have suggestions?

Re: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200

2005-07-01 by Steve Kale

I suspect you won't find it very efficient to drain the ink from one
cartridge to place it in another that will fit the 2100.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: copal01 <copal01@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:51:08 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200
> 
> Hello
> I have an 2100 lying around. Anyone using the new K3's in a 2100? I
> initially would use MIS spongeless cartridges and refill from 220ml
> cartridges. I know that I would need custom profiles.  Anyone doing
> this sort of thing or have suggestions?
>

Re: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200

2005-07-01 by Steve Kale

Sorry I meant INEFFICIENT  (duh)
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: Steve Kale <stevekale@btinternet.com>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:41:38 +0100
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200
> 
> I suspect you won't find it very efficient to drain the ink from one
> cartridge to place it in another that will fit the 2100.
> 
> 
>> From: copal01 <copal01@...>
>> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:51:08 -0000
>> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>> Subject: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200
>> 
>> Hello
>> I have an 2100 lying around. Anyone using the new K3's in a 2100? I
>> initially would use MIS spongeless cartridges and refill from 220ml
>> cartridges. I know that I would need custom profiles.  Anyone doing
>> this sort of thing or have suggestions?
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership
> without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the
> membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
> Moderators. See „Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines‰ in the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE „OWNER‰ AND
> „MODERATORS‰ OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL,
> USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  „OWNER‰ AND „MODERATORS‰ OF
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW,
> THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR
> TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200

2005-07-01 by sssubito

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale 
<stevekale@b...> wrote:
> I suspect you won't find it very efficient to drain the ink from one
> cartridge to place it in another that will fit the 2100.
> 

Why? Epson OEM cartridges for the 2100/2200 are not difficult to 
refill after a little modification. The big cartridges (Epson 4x00/
7x00/9x00/10600) are a great and quite cheap source for UC bulk ink.


Bye, sssubito

Re: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200

2005-07-01 by Steve Kale

Ok I am having a blonde moment...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: Steve Kale <stevekale@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:56:04 +0100
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200
> 
> Sorry I meant INEFFICIENT  (duh)
> 
> 
>> From: Steve Kale <stevekale@...>
>> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:41:38 +0100
>> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200
>> 
>> I suspect you won't find it very efficient to drain the ink from one
>> cartridge to place it in another that will fit the 2100.
>> 
>> 
>>> From: copal01 <copal01@...>
>>> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:51:08 -0000
>>> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>>> Subject: [Digital BW] Epson K3 inks in a 2100/2200
>>> 
>>> Hello
>>> I have an 2100 lying around. Anyone using the new K3's in a 2100? I
>>> initially would use MIS spongeless cartridges and refill from 220ml
>>> cartridges. I know that I would need custom profiles.  Anyone doing
>>> this sort of thing or have suggestions?
>>>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.