Digital BW, The Print

I may have to get another PC- I want to go with XP Pro (2000P now). 
Is there a consensus as to which is better?  Someone told me that XP
was difficult in their graphics bureau.  Thanks, Kip.

At the expense of contributing to the OS wars I am compelled to speak  
my $.02.

Get a MAC!

I do have a lot of experience with PC's and much research before  
making the switch a year and a half ago.

Charles Carstensen

On Jul 6, 2005, at 1:37 PM, kipduff wrote:

> I may have to get another PC- I want to go with XP Pro (2000P now).
> Is there a consensus as to which is better?  Someone told me that XP
> was difficult in their graphics bureau.  Thanks, Kip.

Kip,

this forum isn't the place to compare OS choices - unless you 
are asking if one or the other OS version makes better bw prints.
More to the point: you should ask about your preferred driver for bw prints and
whether it runs on the OS of your choice or not.
I work with IJC/OPM which runs on XP pro and Mac OS X. Don't know about 2000P.
I know QTR and Imageprint run on both platforms; StudioPrint is Windows only.
Don't know if they cover 2000P. Most drivers try to stay with the current version
of an OS - which would be one of the flavors of XP.
What do you use to make bw prints?

Antonis


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "kipduff" <kip.duff@g...> wrote:

> I may have to get another PC- I want to go with XP Pro (2000P now). 
> Is there a consensus as to which is better?  Someone told me that XP
> was difficult in their graphics bureau.  Thanks, Kip.