Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

FW: [Digital BW] Re: Hahnemuhle flaking

FW: [Digital BW] Re: Hahnemuhle flaking

2005-07-09 by Jim Doyle

Jack,

EEM & Premium Luster Will Never Flake Or have Dust on them.. They are made
in a different process.. The HPR is 100% cotton and all 100 % cotton papers
have this problem and I mean ALL!!
Cut sheets are handled more so they have a higher probablitiy to have this
issue..Your doing just fine !! Thats The reccomended way to handle these
expensive papers..

the Only way HPR could Get better is by making a Thicker coating but that
will not happen..Because a thicker coating will result in a different Ink
response..

Cheers

Jim Doyle


J. Doyle Enterprises LLC
114 Old Orchard Rd
Cherry Hill, NJ 08003
856-424-8660
www.shadesofpaper.com
AOL IM: Brokerup99
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
johnmuir.geo
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 12:08 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Hahnemuhle flaking


Djon, I just noticed this reply from you.  I'll elaborate on my
printing process and environment.

First of all, I have found no problems with other papers in the same
environment, with the exception of Moab Entrada.  I have used
Somerset, Epson Premium Luster, and EEM.  None of these have "flaked".

Nevertheless, dust could be an issue.  I am in a very dry climate,
and perhaps the HPR developes a static charge that picks up dust.  It
could also be the ink density. I only notice the problem with B/W
prints, especially in the lightest greys.  I do not see it in my
color work.

At any rate, my lint roller solution seems to be working for now, and
after I'm finished with these rolls of HPR, maybe I'll try some of
the alternatives suggested here.  I'm not eager to abandon the HPR,
because it took me some time, and wasted paper, to refine the
workflow.

Jack


-- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Djon"
<westsidemaurice@y...> wrote:
>
> Has Hahnemuhle addressed this?
>
> "Flaking" may be a misdiagnosis. Maybe it's just dust?
>
> I don't know anything about Hahnemuhle, but if dust is printed-over
it
> can fall off after printing, along with the pigment that covered it,
> leaving a white spot. A year ago Moab identified that problem with a
> batch of Entrada, sait it was dust they had failed to vacuum after
> cutting and before packaging. I had paper from that batch, had that
> problem, eliminated it 100% by following Moab's advice, dusting with
> canned air before insertion in the printer. Good company.
>
> IMO there's less logic to wiping with a rag or brush unless one
> imagines there really mechanical failure of the paper surface,
genuine
> "flaking."
>
> I wonder what's really happening with HPR ... if I used it I'd want
to
> prove to myself that it's not just paper dust that can be removed
with
> compressed air (canned air). If that's not ithe problem I'd
certainly
> find another paper.
>
> Clean working conditions (dust cover over printer when not in use,
no
> construction work around printer, low foot traffic,
> better-than-office/shop cleanliness etc) are obvious requirements.
>
>  Darkroom workers know about dust, but some inkjet users may have
> never considered the basics...?
>
>
>
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "johnmuir.geo"
> <johnmuir.geo@y...> wrote:
> > I use HPR for all my work, including B/W.  I print on the 7600
with UC
> > inks and QTR.
> >
> > I am noticing a few tiny bits of flaking,pin point size, even
after
> > spraying with Print Shield.  I spot the darkest areas with black
> > pastels before spraying, but there is no way I can deal with
flaking in
> > the mid tones.  I have even tried using a draftsman's horsehair
brush,
> > but still see problems.  Am I being too picky?
> >
> > This is making me crazy.




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

  a..  Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web.

  b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

  c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/44 - Release Date: 7/8/2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Hahnemuhle flaking

2005-07-09 by Paul Roark

> 
> EEM & Premium Luster Will Never Flake Or have Dust on them.

Actually, while it's rare, I've seen flakes on EEM and Epson Premium papers.

>...all 100 % cotton papers have this problem ...

It's a matter of degree.  Innova papers are much better than most, and Epson
UltraSmooth & PremierArt fine art papers are arguably better yet.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

[Digital BW] Re: Hahnemuhle flaking

2005-07-10 by Clayton Jones

>Actually, while it's rare, I've seen flakes on EEM 

Same here.  EEM definitely will do it on occasion.


>>...all 100 % cotton papers have this problem ...
> 
>It's a matter of degree.  Innova papers are much better than most, 
>and Epson UltraSmooth & PremierArt fine art papers are arguably 
>better yet.

Agreed again, it does happen with those.  The worst in my experience,
by far, is Entrada, even after vigorous wiping and strong compressed
air burst.


Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

[Digital BW] Re: Hahnemuhle flaking

2005-07-12 by saldelrey

I have read a few of the posts on flaking and can concur regarding my
first sample of 
Entrada. I recently ( two weeks ago) completed a handmade hardcover
book project where 
the photos were to be printed seperately and attached to the pages of
the book ( made 
from Arches hot press watercolor paper). I was working on a deadline
and received the 
Moab Entrada 190 Bright White the day before I needed to print 12
images for each book, 
36 in all. I decided to make a test print that day and the next day
when i went to do my 
final prints i looked closely and the surface of the Moab was
liberally sprinkled with white 
dots. I called Moab and they at first said it might be flaking from
the cut edges and could 
be dealt with by using compressed air and wiping down. When I
explained the extent of 
the problem, they asked for the lot number and said that the lot I
purchased (from Lexjet) 
was indeed defective. They said that there was a problem in the
baking process, too hot or 
too cold ovens I can't quite recall. What is interesting is that this
batch was not in their 
website section on recalled papers, and Lexjet had not been informed
regarding the 
situation. Had I not closely inspected the test print I could have
produced all the books 
and not known until it was too late so I was very lucky. Moab has
been very quick to 
replace the paper and I was considering it an abberation until I read
the recent posts here. 
Hmmmm.. We really can't have this can we? Why have archival paper if
you can't depend 
on the basic stability of the surface. Maybe this is something that
could be tested along 
with lightfastness. Anyhow, I managed to get some Epson Radiant White
Watercolor paper 
which did a very nice job using the neutral settings in Advanced
Black and White mode in 
my Epson 2400. 

The bad batch serial number is BK4-249-1 (look on the back of the
box)  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Actually, while it's rare, I've seen flakes on EEM 
> 
> Same here.  EEM definitely will do it on occasion.
> 
> 
> >>...all 100 % cotton papers have this problem ...
> > 
> >It's a matter of degree.  Innova papers are much better than most, 
> >and Epson UltraSmooth & PremierArt fine art papers are arguably 
> >better yet.
> 
> Agreed again, it does happen with those.  The worst in my
experience,
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> by far, is Entrada, even after vigorous wiping and strong compressed
> air burst.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Clayton
> 
> 
> Info on black and white digital printing at    
> http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.