Digital BW, The Print

Hi there,
I am thinking of converting my 2200 to a dedicated B&W printer 
utilizing Jon Cone's K7 inkset (www.inkjetmall.com. Is there anyone 
with expereince with this set up that can comment on both the quality 
of the prints as well as the quality of construction of cartridge; i.e. 
leakage etc?
Vartkes

Hi

I have the same question. If you get any offline replies, please 
include me in.

Thanks

Paulv

 --- In 
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "vartkes_peltekoglu" 
<vartkes@s...> wrote:
> Hi there,
> I am thinking of converting my 2200 to a dedicated B&W printer 
> utilizing Jon Cone's K7 inkset (www.inkjetmall.com. Is there 
anyone 
> with expereince with this set up that can comment on both the 
quality 
> of the prints as well as the quality of construction of cartridge; 
i.e. 
> leakage etc?
> Vartkes

Unfortunately (in my opinion) the community is facturing into more lists, so finding 
specific info is getting to be more work. I think you'll find more user comments over on 
the quadtoneRIP list.
Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "paulvtt" <paulv@w...> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I have the same question. If you get any offline replies, please 
> include me in.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Paulv
> 
>  --- In 
> DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "vartkes_peltekoglu" 
> <vartkes@s...> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > I am thinking of converting my 2200 to a dedicated B&W printer 
> > utilizing Jon Cone's K7 inkset (www.inkjetmall.com. Is there 
> anyone 
> > with expereince with this set up that can comment on both the 
> quality 
> > of the prints as well as the quality of construction of cartridge; 
> i.e. 
> > leakage etc?
> > Vartkes

I agree and find that this is unfortunate

> From: Tyler Boley <tyler@...>

> 
> Unfortunately (in my opinion) the community is facturing into more lists, so
> finding 
> specific info is getting to be more work.

Tyler Boley wrote:
> Unfortunately (in my opinion) the community is facturing into more lists, so finding 
> specific info is getting to be more work.


My thoughts too. It helps to filter similar subjects into one 
mail folder but the same topics are reappearing more often 
this way and the special ones are harder to find. I wonder 
whether there's one quadtone list member that doesn't follow 
the D B&W list.


                    --
           Ernst Dinkla


www.pigment-print.com
(         unvollendet         )

As with film processing and scanning, it seems to me subjects (threads) that
promote digital B&W generally, promote digital B&W printing.  

Perhaps some of the threads relating to digital cameras could suffer from a
bit of overkill, maybe similar to what can happen with "Mac v. PC" debates.
I can see, for example, that a Canon v. Nikon debate could go over the top.

I, personally, would benefit from having the digital camera threads stay on
this forum to the extent they relate to B&W.  For example, my own concern is
the discontinuance of Technical Pan film and what I'll be able to replace it
with when.           


Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 




 
> 
> Tyler Boley wrote:
> > Unfortunately (in my opinion) the community is facturing 
> > into more lists, so finding
> > specific info is getting to be more work.

Ernst wrote:

> 
> My thoughts too. It helps to filter similar subjects into one
> mail folder but the same topics are reappearing more often
> this way and the special ones are harder to find. I wonder
> whether there's one quadtone list member that doesn't follow
> the D B&W list.
> 
>

Hello All, It was not my intention to cause concern regarding 
fracturing... I thought that B&W fine art printing whether we use 
QuadtoneRIP, Imageprint or other techniques was of interest to us 
all. I use several ways all good under unique circumstances and we 
all benefit from the broader perspective we gain by reading about not 
just one method but others as well... If the majority don't feel this 
way I will limit myself to what is the narrow interest of the group 
in the future.
cheers
Vartkes
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> 
> As with film processing and scanning, it seems to me subjects 
(threads) that
> promote digital B&W generally, promote digital B&W printing.  
> 
> Perhaps some of the threads relating to digital cameras could 
suffer from a
> bit of overkill, maybe similar to what can happen with "Mac v. PC" 
debates.
> I can see, for example, that a Canon v. Nikon debate could go over 
the top.
> 
> I, personally, would benefit from having the digital camera threads 
stay on
> this forum to the extent they relate to B&W.  For example, my own 
concern is
> the discontinuance of Technical Pan film and what I'll be able to 
replace it

> with when.           
> 
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> > 
> > Tyler Boley wrote:
> > > Unfortunately (in my opinion) the community is facturing 
> > > into more lists, so finding
> > > specific info is getting to be more work.
> 
> Ernst wrote:
> 
> > 
> > My thoughts too. It helps to filter similar subjects into one
> > mail folder but the same topics are reappearing more often
> > this way and the special ones are harder to find. I wonder
> > whether there's one quadtone list member that doesn't follow
> > the D B&W list.
> > 
> >