Wilhelm's Integrity
2005-10-12 by claudej1@aol.com
Back in 1993, I paid full price for Wilhem's book and read most of it. I was shocked when I read, in chapter 8, about how many portrait photographers lost their business over faded prints from Kodak. Wilhelm was a "starving scientist" then and really believed in what he was doing. The only difference now is people give a damn BECAUSE of inkjet while no photographer I knew (of hundreds) back then wanted to switch to the superior Fuji paper because Kodak had a monopoly on American Portrait labs. Wilhelm told the truth and Kodak couldn't stop him. The only difference now, is he's got money and credibility by way of the internet, but he has paid his dues for sure. Inkjet, being new, has created a double standard, like most things digital. It's easy to pixel peep a file and put a loupe to an inkjet print. No one ever did that to a darkroom print or bought a microscope to examine film grain. Trust Wilhelm, he's one of the good guys. Claude In a message dated 10/12/2005 7:52:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes: As far as I know, he has never produced a test for a client that they didn't like. That's not to say that Kodak has no self interest either, but they have a very long history of great research and integrity. FWIW, Tom O'Connell [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]