R200 vs R220
2005-12-10 by l33ry
Hi. This is my first time posting a question to this group. I've searched past messages and I have not seen this addressed in any detail. Film photography is a hobby I picked up a year ago. Budget very limited. I don't have the facilities to set up for silver printing, and I'd like to experiment with high-quality inkjet carbon printing, both black-only and quadtone, and it looks like the Epson/MIS route offers the biggest bang for the buck. My Canon i550, while a great general-purpose printer, is not that great for photos, and as far as I can tell has limited black-only capability. Shopping around, refurbished R200's are $60 at the Epson store, but I can also find new R220's for about $35 more. Mr. Roark mentioned in passing that the R220 drivers are significantly improved over the R200's. So just to clarify, can I assume: 1. The R220 is worth the extra $35, particularly for B&W. 2. One cannot use R220 drivers with the R200 printer. I'm shooting 35mm B&W film, developing it in the bathroom, and scanning with a Canoscan 8400f. Quality is acceptable for my current purposes and tastes, except for print output, which is a class below the results I've gotten in the past from an Epson 6-ink RX600. In a year of trying I have not been able to produce a presentation-quality photo print with the i550. Any advice or comments would be appreciated. - Bob Lee