Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Nikon 8000 scanning

Nikon 8000 scanning

2005-12-21 by Doug Stockdale

I noted a remark by Paul regarding his use of the Nikon 8000 
scanner, which I also use for scanning both 6x6cm color and 6x7cm 
color b& w film. Is there a discussion group for the Nikon 8000 film 
scanner? 

The equipment manual is thin and I have had some issues with 
capturing the highlights in my scan files and I am looking for some 
help. The color film has great latitude and I know that I am placing 
my highlights on zone VIII and the resulting scanned file historgram 
ends up off the scale (Zone X or beyond). I belive the issue is the 
software adjustments after the pre-scan. Not sure how to make the 
neccessary adjustments. (Also issues with getting the film really 
flat for the scan, but save that grip for another day)

BTW, I have also opted to use color neg film, scan and convert to a 
b&w file thurough Photoshop. Takes a little longer, but I like 
customizing my channel selection during the b&w conversion 
predicated on my captured image (i.e. do the filter work post 
exposure) and what I want to emphsize in my final b&w print.

Best regards,

Re: Nikon 8000 scanning

2005-12-21 by Greg

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Doug Stockdale" 
<dstockdale@s...> wrote:
> The equipment manual is thin and I have had some issues with 
> capturing the highlights in my scan files and I am looking for some 
> help. The color film has great latitude and I know that I am 
placing 
> my highlights on zone VIII and the resulting scanned file 
historgram 
> ends up off the scale (Zone X or beyond). I belive the issue is the 
> software adjustments after the pre-scan. Not sure how to make the 
> neccessary adjustments. (Also issues with getting the film really 
> flat for the scan, but save that grip for another day)
> 


Try Viewscan software and this for film flatness (and possible other 
benefits):
http://www.aztek.com/Products/NIKONKAMIHOLDER.htm

I haven't used it, but I bet it holds the film nice and flat when 
it's used correctly.

RE: [Digital BW] Nikon 8000 scanning

2005-12-22 by Paul Roark

> ... regarding his use of the Nikon 8000 scanner ...
>... I have had some issues with capturing the highlights ...

I don't do anything fancy in my Nikon 8000 scanning.  The key for B&W
negatives was to scan them as positive grayscales (14 bit).  The Histogram
can set the end points reasonably well.  I leave some headroom on the
highlight side (which is the dark side since I'm scanning the negative as a
positive).

I just did a couple of scans and used my usual procedure of also scanning
one with no Gem and one with Gem at 4.  Then I can clone over the smooth or
grainy areas as needed.  (Gem is a marvel of technology as far as I'm
concerned.)

I do recommend a glass carrier for silver based films -- not chromogenic
film due to Newton's rings problems.


Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Nikon 8000 scanning

2005-12-22 by terry lindquist

Paul:

...what is GEM?

Thank you.


...anyway...

terry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Dec 21, 2005, at 4:13 PM, Paul Roark wrote:

>
>
> I just did a couple of scans and used my usual procedure of also  
> scanning
> one with no Gem and one with Gem at 4.  Then I can clone over the  
> smooth or
> grainy areas as needed.  (Gem is a marvel of technology as far as I'm
> concerned.)
>
>

RE: [Digital BW] Nikon 8000 scanning

2005-12-22 by Tom Baker

I use the same procedures as Paul, and am quite happy with the results.  Just be careful about setting your black and white points.
   
  Tom Baker

Paul Roark <paul.roark@...> wrote:
  

> ... regarding his use of the Nikon 8000 scanner ...
>... I have had some issues with capturing the highlights ...

I don't do anything fancy in my Nikon 8000 scanning.  The key for B&W
negatives was to scan them as positive grayscales (14 bit).  The Histogram
can set the end points reasonably well.  I leave some headroom on the
highlight side (which is the dark side since I'm scanning the negative as a
positive).

I just did a couple of scans and used my usual procedure of also scanning
one with no Gem and one with Gem at 4.  Then I can clone over the smooth or
grainy areas as needed.  (Gem is a marvel of technology as far as I'm
concerned.)

I do recommend a glass carrier for silver based films -- not chromogenic
film due to Newton's rings problems.


Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.



    
---------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    
    Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

    
---------------------------------
  

  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Nikon 8000 scanning

2005-12-22 by Paul Roark

It's the grain removal algorithm.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of terry
> lindquist
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:42 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Nikon 8000 scanning
> 
> Paul:
> 
> ...what is GEM?
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> ...anyway...
> 
> terry
> 
> 
> On Dec 21, 2005, at 4:13 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > I just did a couple of scans and used my usual procedure of also
> > scanning
> > one with no Gem and one with Gem at 4.  Then I can clone over the
> > smooth or
> > grainy areas as needed.  (Gem is a marvel of technology as far as I'm
> > concerned.)
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
> membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
> the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
> and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files
> section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND
> MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
> YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
> EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
> PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
> OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
> ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
> OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
> UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
> STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] Nikon 8000 scanning

2005-12-22 by Ernst Dinkla

Doug Stockdale wrote:

> I noted a remark by Paul regarding his use of the Nikon 8000 
> scanner, which I also use for scanning both 6x6cm color and 6x7cm 
> color b& w film. Is there a discussion group for the Nikon 8000 film 
> scanner? 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/coolscan8000-9000/

> 
> The equipment manual is thin and I have had some issues with 
> capturing the highlights in my scan files and I am looking for some 
> help. The color film has great latitude and I know that I am placing 
> my highlights on zone VIII and the resulting scanned file historgram 
> ends up off the scale (Zone X or beyond). I belive the issue is the 
> software adjustments after the pre-scan. Not sure how to make the 
> neccessary adjustments. (Also issues with getting the film really 
> flat for the scan, but save that grip for another day)

There are some clipping issues on negatives with NikonScan. 
Either scan as positive and reverse in PS or get third party 
software. I like Vuescan and the multi sampling feature is now 
improved + it has the long exposure feature. That takes care 
of most films.

Wet mounting is the best in my opinion.

                    --
           Ernst Dinkla


www.pigment-print.com
(         unvollendet         )

Re: Nikon 8000 scanning

2005-12-22 by djon43

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WETMOUNTING/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SuperCoolscan5000/

Neither is focused on 8000, but there are 8000/9000 users in the wet 
mounting group.

Go to the Yahoo Groups site, browse for Nikon scanning groups...I 
think there's one other than the 5000. 

IMO you may get better and faster 8000/9000 scanning insights from 
photo.net Digital Darkroom Forum.

Nikonscan software is fine for color, but I think most who have 
tried Vuescan for B&W switch to it for color as well: a lot less 
noise(eg no white specks), no grain increase. I'm not sure about 
8000, but 5000 and my V allow use of Scanhancer, which is analagous 
to use of a diffusion enlarger with ultra-sharp lens.

The Nikonscan neg-as-pos>inversion workaround is OK, but it's an 
extra step that isn't necessary or desirable with Vuescan.

Vuescan is no more complicated than Nikonscan, but the front end 
offers more choices, which can be confusing.

The only real downside to Vuescan with Nikon is that it lacks 
Nikonscans ultra-precise optical frameline positioning of 35mm (in 
5000 and V..I don't know about 8000/9000)...Vuescan measures advance 
distances by mm, which is better than Minolta's manual fiddling 
around.

Djon



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Doug 
Stockdale" <dstockdale@s...> wrote:
>
> I noted a remark by Paul regarding his use of the Nikon 8000 
> scanner, which I also use for scanning both 6x6cm color and 6x7cm 
> color b& w film. Is there a discussion group for the Nikon 8000 
film 
> scanner? 
> 
> The equipment manual is thin and I have had some issues with 
> capturing the highlights in my scan files and I am looking for 
some 
> help. The color film has great latitude and I know that I am 
placing 
> my highlights on zone VIII and the resulting scanned file 
historgram 
> ends up off the scale (Zone X or beyond). I belive the issue is 
the 
> software adjustments after the pre-scan. Not sure how to make the 
> neccessary adjustments. (Also issues with getting the film really 
> flat for the scan, but save that grip for another day)
> 
> BTW, I have also opted to use color neg film, scan and convert to 
a 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> b&w file thurough Photoshop. Takes a little longer, but I like 
> customizing my channel selection during the b&w conversion 
> predicated on my captured image (i.e. do the filter work post 
> exposure) and what I want to emphsize in my final b&w print.
> 
> Best regards,
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.