Personally, I like to scan slides in RGB and throw away the data later... It
does eat up space however... Currently I have four 250 Gb drives with
various types of photographic data on them. That's not so bad, but the
archival and backup of that much data is problematic.
I think it may depend on which scanner you are using and what software as to
how it determines the grayscale values -- whether it takes the green values
only only or whether it averages luminance over all three RBG channels and
combines them. Leaving the decision until later allows you, as the artist,
to make the final determination of how to affect the conversion, whether you
use Channels in PS, a third party plug-in, or a Lab conversion. All work;
it's mainly personal preference I think.
And I'm a Mac guy ;-p
Jim
--
parkerparker :: design | photography
http://www.parkerparker.net
On 12/23/05 4:40 PM, "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com"
<DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Subject: Scanning slides for B&W
>
> I'm scanning some old slides to be made into B&W prints. I have the
> impression if I scan them in "grayscale" mode I'm probably only getting the
> green sensors and green information out of the slide. Is that correct? If
> so, I suspect I'm far better off scanning in full 16 bit color and
> converting later. (Although medium format RGB 16 bit files start to get
> slow to work with on my PC.)
>
>
>
> Paul