Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

image editing question

image editing question

2006-01-18 by paisleyvision

I am a relative newbie to b&w printing.  My problem/challenge is a
follows.  I have many old streetcar b&w negatives (116s and 3x5s) from
the 20s onwards.  I'd like to make nice prints from them but can't
seem to get good digital copies.  The images are fine (usually sharp),
albeit often lacking in contrast ... I'm using an epson perfection
4870 photo scanner and corel paint shop pro X for image editing.  I
use the default settings on my scanner to do an initial edit. From
there I open the files in PSP and try, often unsuccessfully, to give
the images a bit more "pop."  My first step is to adjust the levels
... however I'm not sure how to interpret the historigrams apart from
looking for values at both ends ... many historigrams are like an
oscillating curve.  From there, well, as I say, I end up trying a lot
of different things but am never really satisfied.  The images almost
always look flat.  Any suggerstions, even modest ones will be
apprecaited, on where to start?
Thanks
R.A. Paterson

Re: image editing question

2006-01-18 by bobbysandstrom

R.A.

I would suggest getting a copy of Photoshop if you plan on doing this on a regular basis. 
You'll be able to do curve adjustments to control your contrast. The curve will look just like 
film curves you're used to (i presume). If this is just a one time deal, I would suggest paying 
someone that knows photoshop to work your files for you. Don't forget, if the information 
isn't on the film you won't be able to make it up in photoshop. Also, a good film scanner for 
smaller than 4x5 is recommended. Flatbed scanners are as good.

Hope this helps

bob

Re: image editing question

2006-01-18 by bobbysandstrom

R.A.

I would suggest getting a copy of Photoshop if you plan on doing this on a regular basis. 
You'll be able to do curve adjustments to control your contrast. The curve will look just like 
film curves you're used to (i presume). If this is just a one time deal, I would suggest paying 
someone that knows photoshop to work your files for you. Don't forget, if the information 
isn't on the film you won't be able to make it up in photoshop. Also, a good film scanner for 
smaller than 4x5 is recommended. Flatbed scanners are not as good.

Hope this helps

bob

Re: image editing question

2006-01-18 by bobbysandstrom

I meant to say flat bed scanners are NOT as good as dedicated film scanners.

Re: image editing question

2006-01-19 by paisleyvision

Bob
Thanks for taking the time to respond to the elementary questions (for
this forum) of a novice.  I expect, given that this is someting I
expect to do on a regular basis, I'll have to dig deep into my wallet
and buy a copy of Photoshop.  It certainly is the default tool in
almost every image editing book I've seen.  And as I understand it,
the learning curve is quite steep.

I will admit, I have wondered why the scanned negatives from what I
understood to be a good (albeit flatbed) scanner always seems a trifle
soft.  Could you suggest a couple of scanner brands/models to look at?

Also, do you know if there is a "beginners FAQ" or some such document
in the group archives?  I've not found anything like that in my searching.

Thanks again,
R.A. Paterson






--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "bobbysandstrom"
<bobbysandstrom@s...> wrote:
>
> R.A.
> 
> I would suggest getting a copy of Photoshop if you plan on doing
this on a regular basis. 
> You'll be able to do curve adjustments to control your contrast. The
curve will look just like 
> film curves you're used to (i presume). If this is just a one time
deal, I would suggest paying 
> someone that knows photoshop to work your files for you. Don't
forget, if the information 
> isn't on the film you won't be able to make it up in photoshop.
Also, a good film scanner for 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> smaller than 4x5 is recommended. Flatbed scanners are as good.
> 
> Hope this helps
> 
> bob
>

RE: [Digital BW] Re: image editing question

2006-01-19 by Paul Roark

> ... I expect, given that this is someting I
> expect to do on a regular basis, I'll have to dig deep into my wallet
> and buy a copy of Photoshop.  It certainly is the default tool in
> almost every image editing book I've seen.  And as I understand it,
> the learning curve is quite steep.

Photoshop is the industry standard, no question about it.

However, Photoshop Elements is a good, more affordable route.  The main
things it lacks are curves and full 16 bit support.  However, there are good
but partial substitutes for the curves, and there is limited 16 bit support
-- about where full PS was a few generations back.  I bought a copy of
Elements 4 on Ebay for $50 and got a cheap digital camera for my kid for
free.  

I've started to use Elements as a baseline for my workflows so that they
will be more accessible to a larger group of enthusiasts.  Actually, its
treatment of color spaces and color management is in some ways better than
the full version for what we do here.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

image editing question

2006-01-19 by Jack Winberg

Hi RAP:

I THINK that Paintshop Pro has a "curves" adjustment.  Make an "S" 
curve and you can really pop your contrast.

Another technique (though I am not sure if it is available in PSP) 
would be to use the "Multiply" blending mode in an adjustment 
layer.  I found this retrieves amazing detail and pop from old images.

Good luck...... Jack Winberg

At 03:17 AM 1/19/2006, you wrote:
>From: "paisleyvision" <rpaterso47@...>
>Subject: image editing question
>
>I am a relative newbie to b&w printing.  My problem/challenge is a
>follows.  I have many old streetcar b&w negatives (116s and 3x5s) from
>the 20s onwards.  I'd like to make nice prints from them but can't
>seem to get good digital copies.  The images are fine (usually sharp),
>albeit often lacking in contrast ... I'm using an epson perfection
>4870 photo scanner and corel paint shop pro X for image editing.  I
>use the default settings on my scanner to do an initial edit. From
>there I open the files in PSP and try, often unsuccessfully, to give
>the images a bit more "pop."  My first step is to adjust the levels
>... however I'm not sure how to interpret the historigrams apart from
>looking for values at both ends ... many historigrams are like an
>oscillating curve.  From there, well, as I say, I end up trying a lot
>of different things but am never really satisfied.  The images almost
>always look flat.  Any suggerstions, even modest ones will be
>apprecaited, on where to start?
>Thanks
>R.A. Paterson
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: image editing question

2006-01-19 by James Parker

Epson's scanners and their software are good. Starting from the cheaper
flatbeds (the cheapest one with a transparency option is $129 last I
checked), on up to the 4990, the software is consistent and very usable.
I've used Microteks as well, but like them less. Niikon makes a very good
slide scanner if you have many transparencies or negatives (35mm) -- the
5000. But pricey.

You might also look into Hamrick's VueScan as stand-alone scanning software
to use with your existing scanner.

Sounds like you just need to deepen the blacks and lighten the highlights.
While there are lots of ways to do this, a Photoshop curve is the easiest.
Using Levels in Elements or Photoshop is more linear, but you can achieve
better contrast by bringing the shadow slider towards the middle to the
point where you start to see a rise in the histogram. Same with the
highlights, you can bring the highlight slider in towards the middle, to
where the curve starts to rise. That will darken the shadows and lighten the
highlights, effectively giving you more contrast. It will also spread the
histogram out, and if you are over-zealous will result in a "comb" pattern
in the histogram, which means there aren't enough values to go around. Do
this on an adjustment layer so that you can turn it on and off to see what
works.

I don't think there is a beginners FAQ in this forum. You don't say what
scanner or software you're using... Elements is well suited for learning,
and is designed for photographers. It doesn't have the prepress abilities,
but it also doesn't have the high price tag of it's bigger brother. There
are lots of books on image editing out there, with all kinds of slants. If
you have specific scanning questions, you might check out this site:

 http://www.scantips.com/

Jim


On 1/19/06 2:51 PM, "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com"
<DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Subject: Re: image editing question
> 
> Bob
> Thanks for taking the time to respond to the elementary questions (for
> this forum) of a novice.  I expect, given that this is someting I
> expect to do on a regular basis, I'll have to dig deep into my wallet
> and buy a copy of Photoshop.  It certainly is the default tool in
> almost every image editing book I've seen.  And as I understand it,
> the learning curve is quite steep.
> 
> I will admit, I have wondered why the scanned negatives from what I
> understood to be a good (albeit flatbed) scanner always seems a trifle
> soft.  Could you suggest a couple of scanner brands/models to look at?
> 
> Also, do you know if there is a "beginners FAQ" or some such document
> in the group archives?  I've not found anything like that in my searching.
> 
> Thanks again,
> R.A. Paterson

RE: [Digital BW] Re: image editing question

2006-01-20 by Harold Goldberg

This is one of the B & W guru's. Works closely with MIS INKS.
   
  HG

Paul Roark <paul.roark@...> wrote:
  

> ... I expect, given that this is someting I
> expect to do on a regular basis, I'll have to dig deep into my wallet
> and buy a copy of Photoshop.  It certainly is the default tool in
> almost every image editing book I've seen.  And as I understand it,
> the learning curve is quite steep.

Photoshop is the industry standard, no question about it.

However, Photoshop Elements is a good, more affordable route.  The main
things it lacks are curves and full 16 bit support.  However, there are good
but partial substitutes for the curves, and there is limited 16 bit support
-- about where full PS was a few generations back.  I bought a copy of
Elements 4 on Ebay for $50 and got a cheap digital camera for my kid for
free.  

I've started to use Elements as a baseline for my workflows so that they
will be more accessible to a larger group of enthusiasts.  Actually, its
treatment of color spaces and color management is in some ways better than
the full version for what we do here.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.




  SPONSORED LINKS 
        Digital wedding photography   Learn digital photography   Digital photography college     Digital photography   Digital photography web site   Digital photography course 
    
---------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    
    Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

    
---------------------------------
  

  


		
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Photos – Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover
 Photo Books. You design it and we’ll bind it!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] image editing question

2006-01-20 by Lee Hiers

On 1/19/06, Jack Winberg <jack.winberg@...> wrote:

> I THINK that Paintshop Pro has a "curves" adjustment.  Make an "S"
> curve and you can really pop your contrast.
>
> Another technique (though I am not sure if it is available in PSP)
> would be to use the "Multiply" blending mode in an adjustment
> layer.  I found this retrieves amazing detail and pop from old images.

Both curves and the multiply blend mode are available in PSP.

Lee
--
Lee Hiers, AA4GA
"Have Dobro Will Travel"

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.