Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] RAW vs JPGs B&W

Re: [Digital BW] RAW vs JPGs B&W

2006-03-15 by CDTobie@aol.com

In a message dated 3/15/06 4:21:53 PM, bard960@... writes:


> As far as black and white printing is concerned, has anybody in the
> group observed any significant difference in prints from RAW files vs
> prints from JPG files shot in B&W setting? The answer would be
> relevant to memory card capacity. The question came to me reading
> Bruce Fraser's "Understanding Digital Raw Capture" where he
> writes "...JPEG does a decent job of preserving luminance data..."
> that are the data we are after in B&W photography.
> 

Certainly the worst compression in Jpeg is in the colors, not the 
luminance... but you are asking if shooting 256 fixed levels per channel (Jpeg, Tiff, 
what have you), versus the thousands that RAW gives you, is enough. Not for many 
of us...

C. David Tobie
Product Technology Manager
ColorVision Business Unit
Datacolor Inc.
CDTobie@...
www.colorvision.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.