Saving as grayscale
2006-05-18 by Rem Roberti
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2006-05-18 by Rem Roberti
I have experimented with a number of BW conversion methods, but regardless of the method, is it desirable to finally save the image as a mode>grayscale rather than mode>RGB? If so, why? Thanks. Rem
2006-05-18 by lulalake_1999
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Rem Roberti" <remegius@...> wrote: > > I have experimented with a number of BW conversion methods, but > regardless of the method, is it desirable to finally save the image as > a mode>grayscale rather than mode>RGB? If so, why? > > Thanks. > > Rem Hi Rem, It's a bit of personal preference as far as I can see however . . Unless it's just massive, I keep the image in RGB (even though it B&W) until I'm about to print then I make a duplicate and convert to 20% Dot Gain (save with a unique name) and print that copy using QTR. That way I have both files to play with. Jules
2006-05-18 by Brian Chapman
I usually keep the RGB version because I do my B&W conversions using Channel Mixer layers and I commonly go back to make tweaks...so I want to have the RGB available for that purpose. It is, however, much more disk space intensive to keep the RGB version. I usually convert to grayscale just prior to printing to match some of the workflow suggestions from this group. Brian http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "lulalake_1999" <lulalake_1999@...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Rem Roberti" > <remegius@> wrote: > > > > I have experimented with a number of BW conversion methods, but > > regardless of the method, is it desirable to finally save the image > as > > a mode>grayscale rather than mode>RGB? If so, why? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Rem > > Hi Rem, > > It's a bit of personal preference as far as I can see however . . > Unless it's just massive, I keep the image in RGB (even though it > B&W) until I'm about to print then I make a duplicate and convert to > 20% Dot Gain (save with a unique name) and print that copy using QTR.
> > That way I have both files to play with. > > Jules >
2006-05-19 by Jeffery Smith
If you use Genuine Fractals, you can really shrink those files up a lot. Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com <http://www.400tx.com/>
-----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of lulalake_1999 Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:09 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Saving as grayscale --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Rem Roberti" <remegius@...> wrote: > > I have experimented with a number of BW conversion methods, but > regardless of the method, is it desirable to finally save the image as > a mode>grayscale rather than mode>RGB? If so, why? > > Thanks. > > Rem Hi Rem, It's a bit of personal preference as far as I can see however . . Unless it's just massive, I keep the image in RGB (even though it B&W) until I'm about to print then I make a duplicate and convert to 20% Dot Gain (save with a unique name) and print that copy using QTR. That way I have both files to play with. Jules Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. SPONSORED LINKS Digital <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+wedding+photography&w1=Digital+ wedding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+coll ege&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photog raphy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=Umur-3rsLOic7dZMwVL94w> wedding photography Learn <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Learn+digital+photography&w1=Digital+we dding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+colleg e&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photogra phy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=emApqtvj0kHQhppIzRrNgw> digital photography Digital <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+college&w1=Digital+ wedding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+coll ege&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photog raphy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=aIiABJLTZsUnmWBs4mZwuA> photography college Digital <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography&w1=Digital+wedding+ photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+college&w4=D igital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photography+co urse&c=6&s=188&.sig=pJmwqgVzec3JGBtWYlPbOg> photography Digital <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+web+site&w1=Digital +wedding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+col lege&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photo graphy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=BMII8rtDZlAtVdZsPhaZqw> photography web site Digital <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Digital+photography+course&w1=Digital+w edding+photography&w2=Learn+digital+photography&w3=Digital+photography+colle ge&w4=Digital+photography&w5=Digital+photography+web+site&w6=Digital+photogr aphy+course&c=6&s=188&.sig=OrnrutXVhHZu-7E7ccLtuw> photography course _____ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS * Visit your group "DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> " on the web. * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Uns ubscribe> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . _____ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2006-05-19 by Clayton Jones
Hello Rem, >I have experimented with a number of BW conversion methods, but >regardless of the method, is it desirable to finally save the >image as a mode>grayscale rather than mode>RGB? If so, why? In my experiments I found no significant difference in the quality of the print when printing as RGB vs Grayscale, and I prefer the grayscale workflow. So in order to save space and avoid the inconvenience of temporarily converting every time I want to print, I save the file as grayscale after Color2BW conversion. Negs are scanned as grayscale. On a complex project I often save several files at progressive stages during the work, as I sometimes will go back a stage and do something different. But once I'm satisfied with the final version I erase the others. Even in grayscale, with all the layers and alpha channels they can easily be over 100mg each. I always save the original RAW file (or neg scan), and also keep detailed notes as I work, so I have a "recipe" to follow (or change) if I ever want to go back and start over. In real life the only times I have reworked a file is in the case of some of my early attempts, from when my PS skills were not as good as they are now. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
2006-05-19 by Rem P Roberti
> Hello Rem, > > >I have experimented with a number of BW conversion methods, but > >regardless of the method, is it desirable to finally save the > >image as a mode>grayscale rather than mode>RGB? If so, why? > > In my experiments I found no significant difference in the quality of > the print when printing as RGB vs Grayscale, and I prefer the > grayscale workflow. So in order to save space and avoid the > inconvenience of temporarily converting every time I want to print, I > save the file as grayscale after Color2BW conversion. Negs are > scanned as grayscale. > > On a complex project I often save several files at progressive stages > during the work, as I sometimes will go back a stage and do something > different. But once I'm satisfied with the final version I erase the > others. Even in grayscale, with all the layers and alpha channels > they can easily be over 100mg each. > > I always save the original RAW file (or neg scan), and also keep > detailed notes as I work, so I have a "recipe" to follow (or change) > if I ever want to go back and start over. In real life the only times > I have reworked a file is in the case of some of my early attempts, > from when my PS skills were not as good as they are now. > > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm > > > > Thanks, Clayton, Brian, Jules... I think that I now have handle on how to proceed with the workflow. Cheers, Rem
2006-05-19 by aromanocpa@optonline.net
Clayton, When you convert to grayscale from the RGB, does it carry over all of the RGB adjustments that you make during the RAW to RGB to Print flow? Would it now be RAW to RG B to grayscale to print? In addition, why would I want to use 20% dot gain instead of gray scale? Art [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2006-05-19 by Clayton Jones
Hello Art, >When you convert to grayscale from the RGB, does it carry over all >of the RGB adjustments that you make during the RAW to RGB to Print >flow? Would it now be RAW to RGB to grayscale to print? Yes. I convert from RAW to 16-bit tif, then do the BW conversion. This can be done with one of several methods, or sometimes I do more than one version before deciding. When I'm satisfied with the conversion, I convert the file to grayscale mode, which reduces file size by 2/3 and makes no visual difference. All BW conversion effects, no matter how they were arrived at, are preserved. I then proceed to work up the image to it's final state. >In addition, why would I want to use 20% dot gain instead of >gray scale? I think there's a mixup here, this is kind of an Apples/Oranges question. 20% DG is an image profile which can be applied to a grayscale image (it can't be applied to an RGB image). If an image is grayscale there are certain choices of profiles to use. DG20 is one, GG2.2 is another popular one. You can see this in PS. Open an RGB image and go to the Image/Mode/Assign Profile window and look at the choices. Then do the same with a grayscale image - completely different. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
2006-05-19 by Mark Savoia
Sidetrack here for a second, there is an Photoshop action that generates six ways of converting to grayscale. Uses standard settings but since it's an action, it can be edited. You can find it with a Google search, it's called "6 grays.atn" Mark
On May 19, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Clayton Jones wrote: > <converting to grayscale> this can be done with one of several > methods, or sometimes I do more > than one version before deciding.
2006-05-19 by aromanocpa@optonline.net
Clayton I think I understand now. I see alot of emails stating to use the grayscale format with the prewritten ICCs for their printer ink combinations. Now I see that you can make your adjsutments in RGB convert to grayscale and use the ICC. Is this correct? Where can I get ICCs for the R220 with MIS inks Art [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2006-05-19 by Clayton Jones
Hello Art, >I think I understand now. I see alot of emails stating to use the >grayscale format with the prewritten ICCs for their printer ink >combinations. Yes, most of the various workflows discussed here are for grayscale files. >Now I see that you can make your adjustments in RGB >convert to grayscale and...<whatever comes next> Yes. The BW conversion is crucial to the overall look and feel, but in a sense is merely preparation, setting the stage so to speak, for the rest of the work. >...use the ICC. Is this correct? >Where can I get ICCs for the R220 with MIS inks Sorry, I'm the wrong person to ask about that, as I don't use them. I'm sure Paul Roark or some others will jump in here with that. There are a variety of approaches. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
2006-05-19 by aromanocpa@optonline.net
Thank you Clayton Art [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2006-05-19 by Brian Chapman
Art, Paul has ICC's for some papers here: http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/R220_UT-R2_ICC_Download.html If you're using the 3D inks, the links are at the top of this page: http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/ Brian http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m, aromanocpa@... wrote:
> > Thank you Clayton > > Art > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
2006-05-19 by aromanocpa@optonline.net
Thank you Brian Art [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]