Ren Wax on Silver Rag printed on a 2400
2006-07-07 by TK Thompson
Ok, I did the coatings test on Silver Rag similiar to what I did on Innova F type that I reported earlier. The best looking section of the Silver Rag print was coated with Premier Print Shield with no wax! THe second best looking to my eye was the plain print with no coating - it did have evidence of gloss differential but did have luminous shadow detail. The Premier Print Shield only section had zero gloss differential and slightly more "richness" and "luminosity" to the shadow detail. There didn't seem to be much difference in the highlights. The third best looking was the wax on top of Print Shield - the fourth was the waxed only print with no spray. Again the ClearJet Semigloss FA spray gave a veiled look to the print whether waxed on not. Some caveats: These were pretty subjective tests judged with only my eyes and a friend - we agreed on the results. All were done on the same printer using the same K3 set of ink cartridges with the PK black. The differences between 1st, 2nd, and 3rd places are very small, like barely noticable. The same image was used for both tests, just printed on the different papers using the same printer setting for both. The prints were evaluated on my desktop with a drafting light that had both a florescent and incadesent bulbs operating. Maybe using daylight would give different results. I only had the ClearJet Semigloss FA spray - they make a lot of other types of sprays that may work better. The semigloss kind of kills the richness of both of the papers tested. What I learned: For me, I will use Premier Print Shield spray with Silver Rag prints and will wax Innova F Type Gloss Ultra Smooth prints with Rennesance Wax. I will use both papers, the innova has a white base whereas the silver rag has more of a cream color base. Both papers give about the same tonal range with my printing scheme. Both make very lovely images. I think the gloss differential issue is overblown for framed work - you can't see it when framed behind museum glass. It may be visable when looking at prints held in the hand - it takes a pretty acute viewing angle to see it on the uncoated section of the print. This is what worked for me with my setup and my eyes for evaluation - I advise anyone interested to do their own testing to arrive at their own results. Cheers, TK