Digital BW, The Print

Hello everyone,

I recall reading somewhere that it is better to size an image at 288
ppi rather than 300 ppi for printing on an Epson 2400 since 288 is an
integral multiple of the 1440 dpi resolution of the printer.

Has anyone tested this?

Thanks,

Roger

I suggest the thread "300ppi vs 360ppi" (#67841) I started 18 months ago 
might help.
Steve Gledhill
http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk/

roger98195 wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I recall reading somewhere that it is better to size an image at 288
> ppi rather than 300 ppi for printing on an Epson 2400 since 288 is an
> integral multiple of the 1440 dpi resolution of the printer.
>
> Has anyone tested this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roger
>
>
>
>  

		
___________________________________________________________ 
All New Yahoo! Mail \ufffd Tired of Vi@gr@! come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

Roger,

> I recall reading somewhere that it is better to size an image at 288
> ppi rather than 300 ppi for printing on an Epson 2400 since 288 is an
> integral multiple of the 1440 dpi resolution of the printer.

The printer driver will automatically resize it to 720ppi, so it is best to 
resize to 360ppi, but if it is anwhere between 240 and 480 you may not 
notice the difference. There is nothing at all magical about 300ppi.

Bob Frost.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "roger98195" <roger98195@...>