Digital BW, The Print

Helene,
I find your question perplexing.  In any place, there is visual information
between trees and branches, like details of rocks behind the trees, squirrels,
birds, whatever.

What exactly do you *think* could be between tree branches?  Certainly there has
to be *something*!

There was a similar thread on one of the scanner lists last summer, and it also
included the resolving power of films well as something to do with lenses.
During that discussion, someone posted a bunch of details from scans and digital
captures.  It *clearly* illustrated what I am talking about (a picture being
worth 1000 words and all), and am frustrated that I cannot explain it further.


Harvey Ferdschneider
partner, SKID Photography, NYC


grdglass@... wrote:

>  Harvey,
>
> What exactly is the information between tree branches?
>
> Helene
>
> << Actually the digital cameras do very well with the tree branches (because
> of the
> straight line algorithms), but it's the information *BETWEEN* the branches.
> It's that information that the digital cameras cannot resolve or properly
> interpret, but can be found in film. >>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]