I recently purchased an Epson 3800 and would like to be able to print
full-frame 35mm format images as large as possible (16 x 24 with a
border on each side). All I can find is 17 x 22 inch paper. Surely
I'm not the only person with this issue. What is the rationale for
the 22-inch length anyway? Does anyone know of a source for 17 x 25
inch paper?
try google - quick search turned up
Hawk Mountain has four different papers available in 17x25 cut sheets.
http://www.hawkmtnartpapers.com:80/size.htm<http://www.hawkmtnartpapers.com/size.htm>
On 22/07/07, larry_chait <ldchait@...> wrote:
>
> I recently purchased an Epson 3800 and would like to be able to print
> full-frame 35mm format images as large as possible (16 x 24 with a
> border on each side). All I can find is 17 x 22 inch paper. Surely
> I'm not the only person with this issue. What is the rationale for
> the 22-inch length anyway? Does anyone know of a source for 17 x 25
> inch paper?
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
On Jul 22, 2007, at 11:32 AM, larry_chait wrote:
> I recently purchased an Epson 3800 and would like to be able to print
> full-frame 35mm format images as large as possible (16 x 24 with a
> border on each side). All I can find is 17 x 22 inch paper. Surely
> I'm not the only person with this issue. What is the rationale for
> the 22-inch length anyway? Does anyone know of a source for 17 x 25
> inch paper?
Larry,
You might try buying a roll of your favorite paper and cut it to the 25
inch length (or 27 to aid handling). I bought 17 inch rolls for my R1800
(13 inch wide) and cut it to 13 inch lengths. A week or so in a sleeve
under a 13 x 19 box and it flattened out to be quite usable. I didn't
want to waste paper as I shoot square or 4x5 and had little use at the
time for the extra length of the 13 x 19.
Will
larry_chait wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I recently purchased an Epson 3800 and would like to be able to print
>full-frame 35mm format images as large as possible (16 x 24 with a
>border on each side). All I can find is 17 x 22 inch paper. Surely
>I'm not the only person with this issue. What is the rationale for
>the 22-inch length anyway? Does anyone know of a source for 17 x 25
>inch paper?
>
>
>
>