Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Can someone please diagnose cause of banding?

Can someone please diagnose cause of banding?

2007-10-13 by Richard Smallfield

http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/TestImages/photo#5120611245092197986

Hi,
I've posted a crop from a print from my Epson 2100 with QTR / Warm curve UC inks ... it's not blocked nozzles because it's *dark* banding. Never seen this before.

The banding runs parallel with the direction of the print head.

You can see it running vertically in the misty trees.

thanks,
Richard
--
http://smallfield.vze.com
http://photos.smallfield.vze.com (Photos web site)
http://warkworth.vze.com/ (Warkworth photo essay)
http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/ (Recent work) 

   "Compassion will cure more sins than condemnation."
   --Henry Ward Beecher, preacher and writer (1813-1887)

Re: Can someone please diagnose cause of banding?

2007-10-13 by Jules

It looks like actual trees to me! In which orientation was it printed?
Jules




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard Smallfield 
<r.smallfield@...> wrote:
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/TestImages/photo#5120611245092197986
> 
> Hi,
> I've posted a crop from a print from my Epson 2100 with QTR / Warm curve UC inks ... 
it's not blocked nozzles because it's *dark* banding. Never seen this before.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> The banding runs parallel with the direction of the print head.
> 
> You can see it running vertically in the misty trees.
> 
> thanks,
> Richard
> --
> http://smallfield.vze.com
> http://photos.smallfield.vze.com (Photos web site)
> http://warkworth.vze.com/ (Warkworth photo essay)
> http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/ (Recent work) 
> 
>    "Compassion will cure more sins than condemnation."
>    --Henry Ward Beecher, preacher and writer (1813-1887)
>

Re: [Digital BW] Can someone please diagnose cause of banding?

2007-10-13 by Stephen Castello

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:30:41 +1300, Richard Smallfield
<r.smallfield@paradise.net.nz> had a flock of green cheek conures
squawk out:

>http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/TestImages/photo#5120611245092197986
>
>Hi,
>I've posted a crop from a print from my Epson 2100 with QTR / Warm curve UC inks ... it's not blocked nozzles because it's *dark* banding. Never seen this before.
>
>The banding runs parallel with the direction of the print head.
>
>You can see it running vertically in the misty trees.
>
>thanks,
>Richard

The vertical lines are the tree trunks.  Also, they are only in the
trees.

Stephen
--

Re: [Digital BW] Can someone please diagnose cause of banding?

2007-10-13 by Richard Smallfield

At 03:46 AM Sunday 10/14/2007, you wrote:
>The vertical lines are the tree trunks. Also, they are only in the
>trees.

Blooming 'eck! I think you're right!!! What an idiot I've been. It's on the negative scan, but because they are so evenly spaced I thought it must have been a flaw in the print - I hadn't noticed it on screen.

Apologies for wasting your time,
Richard 
--
http://smallfield.vze.com
http://photos.smallfield.vze.com (Photos web site)
http://warkworth.vze.com/ (Warkworth photo essay)
http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/ (Recent work) 

   "It is not goodness to be better than the worst."
   --Lucius Annaeus Seneca, the Younger 4 B.C. - A.D. 65

Re: Can someone please diagnose cause of banding?

2007-10-14 by kpoore2001

Richard,
You can waste my time anytime! I am new here though and a novice 
trying to learn more about black & white photography.
Sorry for your illness (went to your websites), but I admire your 
work and positive attitude.
Best,
Karen in Austin, TX  USA

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard 
Smallfield <r.smallfield@...> wrote:
>
> At 03:46 AM Sunday 10/14/2007, you wrote:
> >The vertical lines are the tree trunks. Also, they are only in the
> >trees.
> 
> Blooming 'eck! I think you're right!!! What an idiot I've been. 
It's on the negative scan, but because they are so evenly spaced I 
thought it must have been a flaw in the print - I hadn't noticed it 
on screen.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> Apologies for wasting your time,
> Richard 
> --
> http://smallfield.vze.com
> http://photos.smallfield.vze.com (Photos web site)
> http://warkworth.vze.com/ (Warkworth photo essay)
> http://picasaweb.google.com/rsmallfield/ (Recent work) 
> 
>    "It is not goodness to be better than the worst."
>    --Lucius Annaeus Seneca, the Younger 4 B.C. - A.D. 65
>

Re: [Digital BW] Can someone please diagnose cause of banding?

2007-10-15 by James Haney

Classic Richard!

We've all had one or two of those experiences.

Like the time I struggled with generating a usable calibration print  
for hours, before realizing that one of the ink lines in my  
continuous flow system was completely dry.

Ooops!




On Oct 13, 2007, at 5:18 PM, Richard Smallfield wrote:

> At 03:46 AM Sunday 10/14/2007, you wrote:
> >The vertical lines are the tree trunks. Also, they are only in the
> >trees.
>
> Blooming 'eck! I think you're right!!! What an idiot I've been.  
> It's on the negative scan, but because they are so evenly spaced I  
> thought it must have been a flaw in the print - I hadn't noticed it  
> on screen.
>
> Apologies for wasting your time,
> Richard
> -
>> .
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.