Digital BW, The Print

Hello all, newbie here.

Can someone please tell me what's the difference between the Epson C88
and C88+ printers? This is in the context of using them to print B&W
prints.

Thanks, Fred

The C88+ has a "+" sign. It goes to 11.



Seriously, and my apologies to Spinal Tap, I believe the major difference is printing resolution. The C88+ doubled printing resolution over the C80.




Either is a terrific b/w printer with the MIS EZ inks.




Bill Kennedy

K2 Press

Austin, Texas

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred <fjmasters@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 7:00 pm
Subject: [Digital BW] Difference between Epson C88 and C88+

























    

            
Hello all, newbie here.



Can someone please tell me what's the difference between the Epson C88

and C88+ printers? This is in the context of using them to print B&W

prints.



Thanks, Fred





    
  

    
    
    
    
    
    


    


    
    
    
    
    


 






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I've used both with the MIS EZ inks over the past 3+ years and noticed 
absolutely no difference between them in the prints.

Cheers,
Kip

BKPhoto@... wrote:
>
> The C88+ has a "+" sign. It goes to 11.
>
> Seriously, and my apologies to Spinal Tap, I believe the major 
> difference is printing resolution. The C88+ doubled printing 
> resolution over the C80.
>
> Either is a terrific b/w printer with the MIS EZ inks.
>
> Bill Kennedy
>
> K2 Press
>
> Austin, Texas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred <fjmasters@... <mailto:fjmasters%40yahoo.com>>
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 7:00 pm
> Subject: [Digital BW] Difference between Epson C88 and C88+
>
> Hello all, newbie here.
>
> Can someone please tell me what's the difference between the Epson C88
>
> and C88+ printers? This is in the context of using them to print B&W
>
> prints.
>
> Thanks, Fred
>
> ___ 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]