Digital and Ansel Adams Zone System
2009-10-11 by Iric S
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2009-10-11 by Iric S
As a long time film user, I lived and breathed the 6 step zone system. Does anyone have any information on the details or mental changes needed for the 5 step digital zone, or how HDR can reproduce the 6 zone spread? Even think pieces would be useful for me. Thanks.
2009-10-12 by Andrew Sharpe
The most important thing to remember in digital is "expose for the highlights, and 'develop' for the shadows". The exact opposite as it is for film. Instead of exposing for the shadows and putting them on III, expose for the highlights and put them on VII. I'm trivializing it, of course, but I don't like HDR at all (whenever I've seen it -- and indeed, that's the key, I don't *want* to see it), so I prefer to choose my exposure more carefully when I first take the photograph, rather than layer multiple photographs together. Andrew On 10/11/2009 04:48 PM, Iric S wrote: > > > As a long time film user, I lived and breathed the 6 step zone system. > Does anyone have any information on the details or mental changes needed > for the 5 step digital zone, or how HDR can reproduce the 6 zone spread? > Even think pieces would be useful for me. > > Thanks. > > -- http://andrewsharpe.com
2009-10-12 by C D Tobie
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:22 AM, Andrew Sharpe wrote: > I'm trivializing it, of course, but I don't like HDR at all (whenever > I've seen it -- and indeed, that's the key, I don't *want* to see it), > so I prefer to choose my exposure more carefully when I first take the > photograph, rather than layer multiple photographs together. Many people feel that way. Multiple exposure HDR, as well as having a somewhat artificial look, also serves to limit photography in much the same way slow to set up large format cameras did: you tend to only shoot that which is not moving or changing. If you learn to work with single RAW exposures from a high dynamic range camera, the world of subject matter available to you is much, much larger. I'd suggest getting a SpyderCube to assist in your initial "zoning" choices. When Richard Wolfson finally decided to take the leap into digital, he purchased a Canon full sensor camera, and arranged to spend a week or so in Santa Fe with me for his first shooting trip. I convinced him that, before that, he needed to do a day shoot to be sure he had the right equipment, bags etc, with him. So he came to Portland Maine and shot with me there. You could see him forming vistas, pondering perspective lines, and making all sorts of decisions before ever took the lens cap off. He looked as me like I was a lunatic as I did what I thought of as typical streets shooting, and kept my camera out after we went into a coffee shop, to shoot little still-lifes of things behind the counter, and a shot straight down on top of my latte, to catch the pattern they had created on it. Afterwards Richard thanked me, not just because it had pointed out some flaws in his packing plans, but because it had pointed out that these digital cameras were a not just a replacement for larger format landscape equipment, they were a Leica in the bargain, and could be used for so much more than just landscape photography. C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Digital Imaging & Home Theater CDTobie@... ---------- Datacolor www.datacolor.com/Spyder3 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]