Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: OT-Not [Digital BW] OT - Image Stabilization test

Re: OT-Not [Digital BW] OT - Image Stabilization test

2009-10-12 by Gary Brown

Can we stop using the "OT" as a license to talk about anything and everything. One of the best things about this forum is that it stays very much on topic.
Image stabilization (IS) has nothing to do with Digital Black & White Printing. There are many more appropriate places to discuss IS. On many days lately, it seems that most of the posts from this forum have an OT in the subject field or should have.

Gary

www.pbase.com/garyallenbrown
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: pr_roark 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 2:27 PM
  Subject: [Digital BW] OT - Image Stabilization test


    I compared tripod v. hand held ("HH") with IS on v. HH with IS off. The results are posted at 

  http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/IS-test-200mm.jpg

  The Canon 70 - 200 IS L was used on on the 5d2. All shots are at 200 mm, were shot RAW, are un-sharpened, and are displayed at 100%.

  I'd say IS works well with a speed that is at least one over the lens length. 

  Paul
  www.PaulRoark.com 



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: OT-Not [Digital BW] OT - Image Stabilization test

2009-10-12 by Mark Savoia

Yah!

Mark
http://www.stillrivereditions.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Oct 12, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Gary Brown wrote:

> Can we stop using the "OT" as a license to talk about anything and  
> everything. One of the best things about this forum is that it stays  
> very much on topic.
> Image stabilization (IS) has nothing to do with Digital Black &  
> White Printing. There are many more appropriate places to discuss  
> IS. On many days lately, it seems that most of the posts from this  
> forum have an OT in the subject field or should have.
>
> Gary
>
> www.pbase.com/garyallenbrown
>
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: pr_roark
>  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m
>  Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 2:27 PM
>  Subject: [Digital BW] OT - Image Stabilization test
>
>
>    I compared tripod v. hand held ("HH") with IS on v. HH with IS  
> off. The results are posted at
>
>  http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/IS-test-200mm.jpg
>
>  The Canon 70 - 200 IS L was used on on the 5d2. All shots are at  
> 200 mm, were shot RAW, are un-sharpened, and are displayed at 100%.
>
>  I'd say IS works well with a speed that is at least one over the  
> lens length.
>
>  Paul
>  www.PaulRoark.com
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other  
> resources as they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish  
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting  
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages  
> to keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or  
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed  
> from the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital  
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be  
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and  
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group  
> Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the  
> Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE  
> “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL  
> NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,  
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,  
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE  
> LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH  
> DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE  
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR  
> ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR  
> CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP;  
> OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO  
> GROUP.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

Re: OT-Not [Digital BW] OT - Image Stabilization test

2009-10-12 by bwinkjet

Hi Gary,
I for one appreciate Paul's report and posted results.
Paul

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Brown" <baffin@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Can we stop using the "OT" as a license to talk about anything and everything. One of the best things about this forum is that it stays very much on topic.

>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: pr_roark 
>   To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 2:27 PM
>   Subject: [Digital BW] OT - Image Stabilization test
> 
> 
>     I compared tripod v. hand held ("HH") with IS on v. HH with IS off. The results are posted at 
> 
>   http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/IS-test-200mm.jpg
> 
>   The Canon 70 - 200 IS L was used on on the 5d2. All shots are at 200 mm, were shot RAW, are un-sharpened, and are displayed at 100%.
> 
>   I'd say IS works well with a speed that is at least one over the lens length. 
> 
>   Paul
>   www.PaulRoark.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.