--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ph@..." <ph@...> wrote: > > On 4/24/06 2:35 PM, "Robair, Gino" <grobair@...> wrote: > > > Thanks for the examples, Ingo. > > Here's a strange question for you (and Dieter, if has some thoughts about > > it): how does one determine which bbd (which number of stages) to purchase, > > without hearing and trying each one? Is it possible to describe the sound > > and behavior of each bbd succinctly? The two I tried at Musikmesse clearly > > sounded different from each other, though I can't remember which they > > were... > > i'd really love a model with maybe 4 different chips( i know this was voted > down with good intentions/reasons) but with 4 or more chips and the ability > to pick which is used OR use any or all that seems ideal in some ways, i > know there are downsides, but i'd love to hear the multiple chips together > in series or parallel in the same circuit. > > best, > phil > hello phil, well, i suggested a version with two bbd's in the beginning, but it wasn't a good idea. believe me, as soon as you have more bbd's, you want a separate clock for each of them. it's a bit of a waste of resources to have four ic's without the possibility to use them separately. best wishes ingo
Message
Re: BBD question: which one?
2006-04-25 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.