Hi Dieter > Sounds interesting for me too. How should the input of the notes be > managed - if not via Midi (e.g. with several CV inputs)? Or is Midi the only > option from your point of view ? Or a separate keyboard just for this > function (e.g. with small buttons only, like the buttons used in the A-107 > or A-113) ? The hardware solution (separate keyboard) would be kind of "analogue sexy" :-). There are also some other tricks, that could be done with such a keyboard. But I think the (economically) best noteinput would be midi, because it would make the module also usable standalone for other (non modular) users. Also such a PIC or uP based module could be extended without a problem to a single track sequencer (you remember the SH-101 sequencer I showed you some years ago?). For the technical side: I don't know how MIDI arpeggiators are programmed in detail, but I assume, that there is a buffer which is a mix of a fifo and an addressable memory. Since we do not have a real addressbus to modify (everything is handled within a PIC or uP), there should be an external Dataword which can be set manually. This data word is digitally AND'ed with the uP-internal address that reads the buffer. The external dataword could be four or more switches, which give 0 or 5 volts, and a corresponding count of input sockets, that are read as binary (eventually with comparators, so one could use continuous control voltages as input). Florian
Message
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: ideas/opinions on quantizer and (VC) arpeggiator
2006-05-18 by Florian Anwander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.