hello dave, i have both doepfer and blacet, but each in their own frames with their own psu's. i haven't tried to power a miniwave with a 12 volts psu, but i guess that it is possible, of course only with some changes on the module pcb. the miniwave works very well together with doepfer modules. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, q v s f u e k p s v h s l w <izimizam@...> wrote: > > i see what a your saying dave , it does need to go alot further than the A112 which i havent tried but sounds cool.I best try the A112 anyway as i like the sound of it ! > > I'm interested to know if anyone here uses the blacet wavetable Vco in a doepfer system and how easy it was to power up using a doepfer system or what you have to do to get the blacet stuff working using a doepfer casing ?do you needa seperate Psu ? > > > > davevosh@... wrote: > > In a message dated 7/4/2006 1:48:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, > izimizam@... writes: > > Surely there is loads of potential for more exotic modules > like this or a decent sampling/user loadable wavetable vector module .I > wonder what possible modules this idea is diverting attention from ? > > hello izam,bakis and ingo, > my comment about "diverted efforts" was meant to reflect on the long list of > things the doepfer folks are working on currently or that have been > extensively discussed here which people have been looking forward to and that could > possibly be accelerated a bit without another thing being "thrown on the pile" > to dilute available resources given that doepfer is a smaller company and > not a huge outfit with 10 r+d guys just sitting around looking for something to > do. :^) > i *am not* opposed to a wavetable vco,i just want to be sure that it > differentiates itself from whats already available. > i hope that makes sense - ? > best, > dave > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier to use" The Wall Street Journal > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: what are we trying to accomplish here re: wavetable vc...
2006-07-05 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.