Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: what are we trying to accomplish here re: wavetable vc...

2006-07-05 by selfoscillate

hello dave,

i have both doepfer and blacet, but each in their own
frames with their own psu's. i haven't tried to
power a miniwave with a 12 volts psu, but i guess that
it is possible, of course only with some changes on
the module pcb.

the miniwave works very well together with doepfer modules.

best wishes

ingo




--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, q v s f u e k p s v h s l w 
<izimizam@...> wrote:
>
> i see what a your saying dave , it does need to go alot further 
than the A112 which i  havent tried but sounds cool.I best try the 
A112 anyway as i like the sound of it  ! 
>    
>   I'm interested to know if anyone here uses the blacet wavetable 
Vco  in a  doepfer system and how easy it was to power up using a 
doepfer system or what you have to do to get the blacet stuff working 
using a doepfer casing  ?do you needa  seperate Psu ? 
>    
>    
> 
> davevosh@... wrote:
>           
> In a message dated 7/4/2006 1:48:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
> izimizam@... writes:
> 
> Surely there is loads of potential for more exotic modules
> like this or a decent sampling/user loadable wavetable vector 
module .I 
> wonder what possible modules this idea is diverting attention from ?
> 
> hello izam,bakis and ingo,
> my comment about "diverted efforts" was meant to reflect on the 
long list of 
> things the doepfer folks are working on currently or that have been 
> extensively discussed here which people have been looking forward 
to and that could 
> possibly be accelerated a bit without another thing being "thrown 
on the pile" 
> to dilute available resources given that doepfer is a smaller 
company and 
> not a huge outfit with 10 r+d guys just sitting around looking for 
something to 
> do. :^)
> i *am not* opposed to a wavetable vco,i just want to be sure that 
it 
> differentiates itself from whats already available.
> i hope that makes sense - ?
> best,
> dave
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>          
> 
>  		
> ---------------------------------
>  Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier 
to use" – The Wall Street Journal
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.