Doepfer

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, davevosh@... wrote:
> i *am not* opposed to a wavetable vco,i just want to be sure that it  
> differentiates itself from whats already available.

I have to agree, although I believe that because this module has been prototyped it would 
be easier to get into production assuming interest was big enough. 

There are modules that have been discussed that I want more but there are also plenty 
that I don't have any interest in. So for me me it's still a yes.

I would like to see a list of all the possible modules and what their status is in terms of 
devolopment, possible release etc. 

TD

In a message dated 7/4/2006 1:48:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,  
izimizam@yahoo.co.uk writes:

Surely  there is loads of potential for more exotic modules
like this or a decent  sampling/user loadable wavetable vector module .I 
wonder what possible modules  this idea is diverting attention from ?


 
 
hello izam,bakis and ingo,
my comment about "diverted efforts" was meant to reflect on the long list  of 
things the doepfer folks are working on currently or that have been  
extensively discussed here which people have been looking forward to and that  could 
possibly be accelerated a bit without another thing being "thrown on the  pile" 
to dilute available resources given that doepfer is a smaller company and  
not a huge outfit with 10 r+d guys just sitting around looking for something to  
do.  :^)
i *am not* opposed to a wavetable vco,i just want to be sure that it  
differentiates itself from whats already available.
i hope that makes sense - ?
best,
dave
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi, I have both Doepfer racks and FracRaks. Though you can run some 
modules designed for +/-15V on +/-12V I never tried it myself. Ever 
since I used a 2nd hand Power One psu. A PAiA FracRak plus a used 
psu should be more economical than forcing Blacet modules into a 
more costly Euro Rack. However, this needs a bit understanding in 
electronics even though it's quite easy. I wouldn't have attempted 
this on my own but had an experienced friend who assisted me. 
Regards, Ingo

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, q v s f u e k p s v h s l w 
<izimizam@...> wrote:
>
> i see what a your saying dave , it does need to go alot further 
than the A112 which i  havent tried but sounds cool.I best try the 
A112 anyway as i like the sound of it  ! 
>    
>   I'm interested to know if anyone here uses the blacet wavetable 
Vco  in a  doepfer system and how easy it was to power up using a 
doepfer system or what you have to do to get the blacet stuff 
working using a doepfer casing  ?do you needa  seperate Psu ? 
>    
>    
> 
> davevosh@... wrote:
>           
> In a message dated 7/4/2006 1:48:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
> izimizam@... writes:
> 
> Surely there is loads of potential for more exotic modules
> like this or a decent sampling/user loadable wavetable vector 
module .I 
> wonder what possible modules this idea is diverting attention 
from ?
> 
> hello izam,bakis and ingo,
> my comment about "diverted efforts" was meant to reflect on the 
long list of 
> things the doepfer folks are working on currently or that have 
been 
> extensively discussed here which people have been looking forward 
to and that could 
> possibly be accelerated a bit without another thing being "thrown 
on the pile" 
> to dilute available resources given that doepfer is a smaller 
company and 
> not a huge outfit with 10 r+d guys just sitting around looking for 
something to 
> do. :^)
> i *am not* opposed to a wavetable vco,i just want to be sure that 
it 
> differentiates itself from whats already available.
> i hope that makes sense - ?
> best,
> dave
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>          
> 
>  		
> ---------------------------------
>  Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically 
easier to use" – The Wall Street Journal

> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

i see what a your saying dave , it does need to go alot further than the A112 which i  havent tried but sounds cool.I best try the A112 anyway as i like the sound of it  ! 
   
  I'm interested to know if anyone here uses the blacet wavetable Vco  in a  doepfer system and how easy it was to power up using a doepfer system or what you have to do to get the blacet stuff working using a doepfer casing  ?do you needa  seperate Psu ? 
   
   

davevosh@aol.com wrote:
          
In a message dated 7/4/2006 1:48:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
izimizam@yahoo.co.uk writes:

Surely there is loads of potential for more exotic modules
like this or a decent sampling/user loadable wavetable vector module .I 
wonder what possible modules this idea is diverting attention from ?

hello izam,bakis and ingo,
my comment about "diverted efforts" was meant to reflect on the long list of 
things the doepfer folks are working on currently or that have been 
extensively discussed here which people have been looking forward to and that could 
possibly be accelerated a bit without another thing being "thrown on the pile" 
to dilute available resources given that doepfer is a smaller company and 
not a huge outfit with 10 r+d guys just sitting around looking for something to 
do. :^)
i *am not* opposed to a wavetable vco,i just want to be sure that it 
differentiates itself from whats already available.
i hope that makes sense - ?
best,
dave


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



         

 		
---------------------------------
 Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The Wall Street Journal

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

a mono to stereo bbd?
what about a mono to stereo bbd module? like the Electro-Harmonix Ambitron
or the TC Electronics 1210?

I recently sold my EH ambitron but really miss this effect? would this
become too expensive? or was the TC 1210 just really overpriced?
The simple EH ambitron was fat and thick.
I also have an Orban 245F Stereo Synthesizer, which i believe uses notch
filters to achieve a similar effect. but a combo of both would make a great
module as most patches are mono.
just add CV and we are golden.
best,
pH

is this some phase chorus pseudo stereo effect?

d



On 5 jul 2006, at 03.34, p.hendricks wrote:

> a mono to stereo bbd?
> what about a mono to stereo bbd module? like the Electro-Harmonix  
> Ambitron
> or the TC Electronics 1210?
>
> I recently sold my EH ambitron but really miss this effect? would this
> become too expensive? or was the TC 1210 just really overpriced?
> The simple EH ambitron was fat and thick.
> I also have an Orban 245F Stereo Synthesizer, which i believe uses  
> notch
> filters to achieve a similar effect. but a combo of both would make  
> a great
> module as most patches are mono.
> just add CV and we are golden.
> best,
> pH
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -------------------- 
> ~-->
> See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/QnLolB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>







***********************************

www.myspace.com/djerase

email: info@erasemusic.com
msn: erasemusic@msn.com
aim: erasemusic@mac.com
icq: 344917989
yahoo: erasemusic@yahoo.com
skype: erasemusic

***********************************

On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:35 PM, erase wrote:

> is this some phase chorus pseudo stereo effect?
http://www.tcelectronic.com/TC1210

hello dave,

i have both doepfer and blacet, but each in their own
frames with their own psu's. i haven't tried to
power a miniwave with a 12 volts psu, but i guess that
it is possible, of course only with some changes on
the module pcb.

the miniwave works very well together with doepfer modules.

best wishes

ingo




--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, q v s f u e k p s v h s l w 
<izimizam@...> wrote:
>
> i see what a your saying dave , it does need to go alot further 
than the A112 which i  havent tried but sounds cool.I best try the 
A112 anyway as i like the sound of it  ! 
>    
>   I'm interested to know if anyone here uses the blacet wavetable 
Vco  in a  doepfer system and how easy it was to power up using a 
doepfer system or what you have to do to get the blacet stuff working 
using a doepfer casing  ?do you needa  seperate Psu ? 
>    
>    
> 
> davevosh@... wrote:
>           
> In a message dated 7/4/2006 1:48:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
> izimizam@... writes:
> 
> Surely there is loads of potential for more exotic modules
> like this or a decent sampling/user loadable wavetable vector 
module .I 
> wonder what possible modules this idea is diverting attention from ?
> 
> hello izam,bakis and ingo,
> my comment about "diverted efforts" was meant to reflect on the 
long list of 
> things the doepfer folks are working on currently or that have been 
> extensively discussed here which people have been looking forward 
to and that could 
> possibly be accelerated a bit without another thing being "thrown 
on the pile" 
> to dilute available resources given that doepfer is a smaller 
company and 
> not a huge outfit with 10 r+d guys just sitting around looking for 
something to 
> do. :^)
> i *am not* opposed to a wavetable vco,i just want to be sure that 
it 
> differentiates itself from whats already available.
> i hope that makes sense - ?
> best,
> dave
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>          
> 
>  		
> ---------------------------------
>  Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier 
to use" – The Wall Street Journal

> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>