Oh, I know what it sounds like - I have an A-137 and I love it. If I had a spectrum analyzer I'd figure my question out on my own.. maybe I can find a spectrum analyzer online ??? thanks anyway.. bryan --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <hardware@...> wrote: > > How about the sound examples on our website (www.doepfer.com) and on Ingo's > website http://www.selfoscillate.de/modularexamples.htm. > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von untiedstates > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. August 2006 08:44 > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Re: a 138 vs WVX > > > > > > Hmmm.. I'd asked on this group previously about the A-137's behavior - > > needing a musical description more than a technical one. > > > > So, along the lines of this discussion, and because the Bananalogue > > page mentions that for the WVX "The signal from Out 1 of the top > > section adds odd overtones.....The bottom section is a full wave > > rectifier, transforming waves to positive voltage with even harmonics." > > > > ... what is going on in the A-137 re: odd and even harmonics? > > > > - this is useful to know because, for example.. tube amplifiers only > > add even harmonics... the sounds of closed-tube instruments such as > > organs only have odd harmonics... etc.. > > > > ???? > > > > thanks. -bryan > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ilanode" <techmeier@> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks! > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander > > > <Florian.Anwander@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Ingo > > > > > > > > > I could be wrong since I have no person. experience with the WVX and > > > > > only little with the A137. Anyhow, I used to think that the A137 > > works > > > > > best for signal with none or few harmonics while the WVX works > > equally > > > > > well on signals which are poor or rich in harmonics. Anyone to > > > clarify? > > > > Also the WVX works "best" with signals with poor harmonics. The > > > question > > > > is, what you define as "best". The Doepfer works as a WVX if you > > don't > > > > use the "multiples" control (or don't overload the input). > > > > > > > > Florian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: a 138 vs WVX
2006-08-23 by untiedstates
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.