I did not notice this poll, so I did not vote. But I love the idea - I actually had Access Virus, and I loved the arpeggiator on it. Regards, Zoran >From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for >Doepfer_a100 >Date: 6 Sep 2006 02:26:22 -0000 > > >The following Doepfer_a100 poll is now closed. Here are the >final results: > > >POLL QUESTION: Would you like Doepfer to release a VC Arpeggiator module? >[This module produces a CV-sequence on its output which is derived from a >chord information at its input. Corresponding Gate-Outs are produced >too. The CV-Sequence is derived from a selectable pattern (pattern not >in the meaning of a sequencer, but the real theoretical meaning). >Details on functions: >Chord information may be provided by midi in, or built-in mini-keyboard, >or both. >The pattern is stored in a memory (EEPROM). The selection of the pattern >could be done by MIDI PrgChange, by CV, and/or on a quasi digital level >(switches or voltage ins (example from a A-160/161) which are read >digitally). I suggest not to provide more than 32 patterns. >It might be possible to transfer pattern data via MIDI and edit them in >an external program. >A pattern contains at least the order by which the notes of the chord >should be played, the ryhtm and note length would depend on th eprovided >clock (classic arpeggiator). >Additionally a pattern might contain the rhythm in which the notes are >played and the lenght of the played notes (extended arpeggiator as it >can be found e.g. the Access Virus). Alternatively it might be possible >to separate note order patterns and rhythmic patterns. >The range of the arpeggio should be also controllable either by CV or >(easier) on quasi digital level (switches, digital voltage ins). >Possible Connections and Controls: >MIDI in >CV-In for transpose >Clock-In >CV-Out >Gate-Out >CV-in for Pattern select >Manual knob for pattern select (provides internal a CV) >Switches for pattern select >sockets for digital adressing of the pattern by CVs >CV-in for Range select >switch(es) for range select >sockets for digital adressing of the range by CVs] > > >CHOICES AND RESULTS >- Yes!, 14 votes, 60.87% >- maybe..., 7 votes, 30.43% >- no., 2 votes, 8.70% > > > >For more information about this group, please visit >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100 > >For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit >http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/ > > > >
Message
RE: [Doepfer_a100] Poll results for Doepfer_a100
2006-09-06 by Zoran Bosnjak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.