Doepfer

Ingo,
 
I know that's the only downside to the idea, it requires 4hp just for
the switches :(
 
Cheers
 
David
 
David Salter
Senior Consultant
PSG 

Reuters Messaging: david.salter.reuters.com@reuters.net
(t) +44 (0)20 7542 2402 | (m) 07990562402 | (f) 52699 

Get the latest news at Reuters.com <http://www.reuters.com/> 

 

________________________________

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of selfoscillate
Sent: 12 September 2006 08:08
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A111/2 tuning knob question




hello david,

i'm afraid that this solution would eat up too much
panel space, but anyway i will put it on the list too.

best wishes

ingo

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> , David Salter
<david.salter@...> 
wrote:
>
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> I've always like the idea of the Emu VCO with individual octave
> switches, thus allowing you to switch from 32' to 4' without going
> through 16' & 8', great for live work.
> 
> david
> 
> David Salter
> Senior Consultant
> PSG 
> 
> Reuters Messaging: david.salter.reuters.com@...
> (t) +44 (0)20 7542 2402 | (m) 07990562402 | (f) 52699 
> 
> Get the latest news at Reuters.com <http://www.reuters.com/
<http://www.reuters.com/> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>  
[mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> On Behalf Of selfoscillate
> Sent: 11 September 2006 12:41
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> 
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] A111/2 tuning knob question
> 
> 
> 
> 
> hello list,
> 
> i'd like to start a poll, but want to collect
> additional ideas first.
> 
> the preliminary frontpanel design of the a111/2 dynamic vco
> offers two knobs for tuning: coarse tune and fine tune.
> lets say, that this is option 1.
> 
> actually there are two other ideas regarding the tuning controls.
> 
> option 2:
> an additional octave switch (like on the a111),
> so we would have three controls for tuning.
> 
> option 3:
> a single multiturn tuning knob (similar to the zeroscillator
> tuning knob, but probably not that big in size), so
> we would have only one knob for tuning. this would be the
> most expensive solution tough.
> 
> any other suggestions?
> 
> btw, from my personal preference i would prefer option 2.
> 
> best wishes
> 
> ingo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
> 
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the 
views of Reuters Ltd.
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



 


To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]