exactly! and useful. best regards, bakis. --- Richard <richardscott@btconnect.com> wrote: > of course an oscilloscope is not "necessary": but it > could be "fascinating" > > R > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: n2eil > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:53 PM > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-100 oscilloscope > module > > > It looks like it's single trace; a dual trace > scope would be a lot more useful. > > Plus, I'm partial to my analog scope. We _do_ like > analog here, right? > > -n > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds [Doepfer_a100] group owner http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic http://www.shimarecords.co.uk http://www.rubber.gr Athens-Greece __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-100 oscilloscope module
2006-10-15 by Bakis Sirros
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.