Doepfer

I agree with this idea. Bandpass filters are more useful in an 
elaborated system thinking
on using it as a little vc filterbank for e.g. percussive effects with 
single outputs.
Two of this modules and you have the same number on single outputs as the
EMS Octave Filter Bank.
But you are more flexible with this module (Q-Factor, Frequencies, Mute, 
Panning...)
Or we will get the option to work with jumpers, similar to the A-127.
I don't know whether it is possible or too expensive.
But thousand people, two thousand ideas are in the field.
In general the new version is very useful!
All the best
Axel

P. Hendricks schrieb:
>
> On 5/7/07 2:44 PM, "Bakis Sirros" <synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com 
> <mailto:synth_freak_2000%40yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> > hello Dieter,
> > a135-2 version two is great!
> > i much prefer this to version one.
> > but what if someone wants cv inputs for resonance?
>
> I would think Bandpass filters or 12dB multi-mode filters would be more
> useful in this application/configuration.
> So, why 24dB lowpass? I guess it makes since for someone starting off
> building a system, but with all the different filters, I don't think I 
> need
> 4 basic 24dB lowpass filters.
> Just my opinion, but it seems like band pass and/or notch filters could be
> more useful with panning effects.
> best,
> phil
>
>