Doepfer

could we add to the poll an option for a 4TE single version ? i think dieter's probably right, 
in that for people for whom space isn't an issue, the 129-3 is already available.

stu


--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <hardware@...> wrote:
>
> As I'm doubtful how many users are asking for such a dual module (keeping in
> mind that we already have A-176 and the offset functions of the mixers and
> the 5-fold offset/attenuator module A-129-3). I ask you (Bakis) to start a
> poll for such a 2-fold offset module. Thank you.
> 
> Dieter Doepfer
> 
> > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von Silas Johansen
> > Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2007 18:42
> > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: adding cv offset
> >
> >
> > A voltage offset module would be convenient in the patches below:
> >
> > Audio source --> A-119 --> Voltage Offset --> A-155 lower row ext. input
> > LFO/VCO --> Voltage Offset --> A-155 lower row ext. input
> >
> > An input voltage attenuator would be convenient. Built in amplification of
> > line level signals would eliminate the need for an A-199 in the
> > first patch.
> >
> > One could fit two of these to an 8HP panel if each included only in & out
> > jacks and input attenuator/amplifier and voltage offset knobs. One half
> > would even have room for an extra jack, perhaps inverse out or an extra CV
> > input with or without attenuator (without attenuator would be useful for
> > voltages coming from a 1V/Oct. CV source) and an extra pot, the
> > aforementioned attenuator for input two or fine tune of voltage offset.
> > Undoubtedly somebody will have other good suggestions.
> >
> > Without an input each half should output the offset voltage. This would in
> > my opinion make for a module similar to but much more useful than
> > the A-176,
> > especially if one half had fine control of offset and an
> > unattenuated input.
> > Granted, only two outputs would be available, but the addition of
> > the offset
> > feature would make up for it.
> >
> > Also, the tuning range of my VCOs is limited to a couple of half
> > tone steps.
> > Detuning one by a larger amount requires the use of a constant CV
> > source and
> > either a mixer or the CV2 input - this module, esp. with an unattenuated
> > input, would be a killer for "fat fifth" type sounds.
> >
> > What I'm describing above is similar and in my opinion superior to the
> > dotcom q125.
> >
> > /Silas
> >
> > On 6/18/07, hardware@... <hardware@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >   > ... but i'm surprised that there is no dedicated offset module -
> > > > something like 4HE with an input, output and a +/- knob that
> > > > could regulate a constant output when nothing is connected to
> > the input.
> > >
> > > With a few exceptions (e.g. A-132) both an offset control and a control
> > > voltage input with attenuator are available for each voltage controlled
> > > parameter of a module. This is why normally separate offset
> > generators and
> > > attenuators are not necessary in the A-100.
> > >
> > > If necessary (e.g. as an offset for the A-132) the manual CV
> > source A-176
> > > could be used as an offset generator. This is why I don't see the
> > > necessity
> > > of a dedicated offset module. But I'm open for suggestions if I
> > overlooked
> > > something.
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>