Hi Ingo > Does this count? "[A] second audio feedback path to boost bass > response at higher Q levels. This makes the filter "growl and rumble" > even more!" Paul S. on the MOTM-440 VCF. > > The MOTM-440 is inspired by the SSM2040 chip and I *guess* the A105 > (which is based on the SSM2044) is similiar in design. Anyhow, I was > never able to give the MOTM-440 a listen but the A105 is impressing. Ok, now we come closer: An increased resonance means, the output voltage of audio signals at the cutoff frequency is increased in comparison to the signals at lower frequncies than the cutoff frequency (speaking only for lowpass filters now). Now there the question is how the filter behaves regarding its complete outputsignal. Several types are possible: 1.) The maximum output voltage of the signal stays the same, which means signals below the cutoff frequency (and below the resonance peak) will have a lower signal level - in other words: There will be less bass with higher resonance. 2.) The output voltage of signals below the cutoff frequency will stay the same, which means the resonance "peak" will have a higher voltage. With other words: higher resonance won't touch the bass. BUT: This will usually cause distortion in the following audio path, because the resonance peak will. This is generally unwanted (and no filter is really designed like that). It could be achieved by simply using an amplification after the resonating filter. 3.) the overall power[*] of the output signal stays the same. This means also that the low frequencies will have a reduced output level (as in 1), but the amount of reduction depends of the resonance frequency: a high frequency in resonance will have less electrical power and will reduce the overall power less than a low frequency in resonance (I hope this description is not too confusing). Dieter once explained to me, how one can determine in the schematic which type of resonance is used, but I don't remember it. To my knowledge the A-122 and A-123 are of type 1, the A-105 is type 3, the A-120 and other non-single-chip-filters are somewhere inbetween type 1 and 3. I don't know about the A-121 (but for 12dB filters this issue is less relevant as for 24dB filters). So I think, the A-105 is the filter that Carlos asked for. For an A-122/123 one could use a CV to control the resonance; the same CV should control also the signal level in a following VCA (with less control amount). This might compensate the level loss at higher resonance settings. Florian [*]we remember physics lessons when we were 14 years old ;-): electrical power is product of voltage and current
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: bassiest doepfer low pass?
2007-10-08 by Florian Anwander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.