these devices are very different. the a112 is a sampler in the first place. you can use your recorded sample as waveforms, so you get a wavetable vco. the a112 is self-contained, you can use it like a vco when sending a pitch-cv to the a112. the miniwave provides a nonlinear transfer function, using a lookup table. the miniwave has built-in waveforms, it has no ram and cannot be used as a sampler. you need a vco to drive the miniwave, so it is not self-contained. the miniwave is very flexible. you are not limited to audio signals, it accepts any input signal, even very slow control voltages. imho the miniwave makes a much better wavetable vco than the a112, but it is also more expensive, especially if you have to add an extra vco to drive it. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "mritenburg" <mritenburg@...> wrote: > > How is the A-112 different than a miniwave? > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "cray5656" <amnesia@> wrote: > > > > This is a dream waiting to happen...what do you say Dieter? > > > > No one does euro miniwaves > > >
Message
Re: Doepfer miniwave
2007-11-21 by selfoscillate
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.