Doepfer miniwave
2007-11-21 by cray5656
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC
Thread
2007-11-21 by cray5656
This is a dream waiting to happen...what do you say Dieter? No one does euro miniwaves
2007-11-21 by mritenburg
How is the A-112 different than a miniwave? --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "cray5656" <amnesia@...> wrote:
> > This is a dream waiting to happen...what do you say Dieter? > > No one does euro miniwaves >
2007-11-21 by selfoscillate
these devices are very different. the a112 is a sampler in the first place. you can use your recorded sample as waveforms, so you get a wavetable vco. the a112 is self-contained, you can use it like a vco when sending a pitch-cv to the a112. the miniwave provides a nonlinear transfer function, using a lookup table. the miniwave has built-in waveforms, it has no ram and cannot be used as a sampler. you need a vco to drive the miniwave, so it is not self-contained. the miniwave is very flexible. you are not limited to audio signals, it accepts any input signal, even very slow control voltages. imho the miniwave makes a much better wavetable vco than the a112, but it is also more expensive, especially if you have to add an extra vco to drive it. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "mritenburg" <mritenburg@...> wrote:
> > How is the A-112 different than a miniwave? > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "cray5656" <amnesia@> wrote: > > > > This is a dream waiting to happen...what do you say Dieter? > > > > No one does euro miniwaves > > >
2007-11-21 by selfoscillate
hello dieter, yes, i remember that pcb you're talking about. i agree that it is a very difficult question what to store in that eprom. imho standard waveforms don't make much sense for such a device. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <hardware@...> wrote: > > > This is a dream waiting to happen...what do you say Dieter? > > > > No one does euro miniwaves > > We developed kind of a miniwave many years ago. Its more than 7 years ago as > the pc board was made with our old Atari based pcb layout software (Ingo: > maybe you remember this board with the two rotary switches to select the > table group, I showed it to you at your last visit). We never released it as > we wanted to have the original PPG wave set available but could not get the > permission. The problem was to find out who is the owner of the copyrights > (Wolfgang Palm or Waldorf or ???) and where we could get the valid > permission. The most important part of a miniwave are the wavetables stored > in the EPROM. The controlling electronics itself is very simple, nothing but > ADCs that address the EPROM and a DAC that reads the EPROM data. E.g. we > could release a miniwave without EPROM or with some basic wavetables only as > I have no idea concerning the copyrights of wavetables. I don't want to deal
> with such judical affairs but develop modules ... > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer >
2007-11-21 by hardware@doepfer.de
> This is a dream waiting to happen...what do you say Dieter? > > No one does euro miniwaves We developed kind of a miniwave many years ago. Its more than 7 years ago as the pc board was made with our old Atari based pcb layout software (Ingo: maybe you remember this board with the two rotary switches to select the table group, I showed it to you at your last visit). We never released it as we wanted to have the original PPG wave set available but could not get the permission. The problem was to find out who is the owner of the copyrights (Wolfgang Palm or Waldorf or ???) and where we could get the valid permission. The most important part of a miniwave are the wavetables stored in the EPROM. The controlling electronics itself is very simple, nothing but ADCs that address the EPROM and a DAC that reads the EPROM data. E.g. we could release a miniwave without EPROM or with some basic wavetables only as I have no idea concerning the copyrights of wavetables. I don't want to deal with such judical affairs but develop modules ... Best wishes Dieter Doepfer
2007-11-21 by mritenburg
Is there a way to add the non-linear transfer function as an add-on module? --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate"
> the miniwave provides a nonlinear transfer function, > using a lookup table. the miniwave has built-in waveforms, > it has no ram and cannot be used as a sampler. > you need a vco to drive the miniwave, so it is not > self-contained. the miniwave is very flexible. > you are not limited to audio signals, it accepts > any input signal, even very slow control voltages.
2007-11-21 by selfoscillate
i don't think so. a112 and miniwave use different techniques. it would make much more sense to have them completely separated. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "mritenburg" <mritenburg@...> wrote:
> > Is there a way to add the non-linear transfer function as an add-on > module? > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" > > the miniwave provides a nonlinear transfer function, > > using a lookup table. the miniwave has built-in waveforms, > > it has no ram and cannot be used as a sampler. > > you need a vco to drive the miniwave, so it is not > > self-contained. the miniwave is very flexible. > > you are not limited to audio signals, it accepts > > any input signal, even very slow control voltages. >
2007-11-21 by selfoscillate
hello dieter, i believe that there are copyrights on the wavetables, but i'm not 100% sure. maybe it is a good idea to ask waldorf. since this year they are back in the business, maybe they have a simple answer to the copyright question. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <hardware@...> wrote: > > > Is there a way to add the non-linear transfer function as an add- on > module? > > The miniwave module does the non-linear transfer. And that's how it's > working. > > Analog Input #1 is converted by a 6 bit ADC (analog-to-digital converter) > into a six bit "word" (range 0...63, the PPG waveforms were only 64 in > length). This is used to address the first 6 address inputs of a memory > (normally a ROM or EPROM). If a standard sawtooth wave is used and the > offset and amplification adusted accordingly one obtains the standard > wavetable synthesis. But even other waveforms or not an accordingly adjusted > sawtooth may be used to obtain special effects (e.g. picking out only a > fraction of the complete wave). A second ADC (normally controlled by a > modulation signal, e.g. from an ADSR or LFO or ...) is used to generate the > higher addresses for the EPROM. This control voltage is used to scan through > the different waves. Switching from one wave to the next can be independent > from ADC#1 or triggered by ADC#1 (e.g. waveform switching is allowed only at > the maximum or minimum value 0/63). In the first case the wave can be > altered even in the middle of a waveform. In the second case the end of the > wave has to be reached to allow the switching to a new wave. > Finally a rotary switch (e.g. with 16 positions) can be used to select a > waveform set. > > The module could be used also as a CV processor if ADC#1 is fed not with an > audio signal (e.g. sawtooth) but a slowly changing control voltage (e.g. > ADSR or LFO). > > As said before: not very complicated from the technical point of view. But > without good wavetables it's nothing ... > And we do not want to get troubles with wavetable copyrights (provided that
> there are copyright) > > Best wishes > Dieter Doepfer > > (P.S. Maybe we have a lawyer in the group who knows details) >
2007-11-21 by hardware@doepfer.de
> Is there a way to add the non-linear transfer function as an add-on module? The miniwave module does the non-linear transfer. And that's how it's working. Analog Input #1 is converted by a 6 bit ADC (analog-to-digital converter) into a six bit "word" (range 0...63, the PPG waveforms were only 64 in length). This is used to address the first 6 address inputs of a memory (normally a ROM or EPROM). If a standard sawtooth wave is used and the offset and amplification adusted accordingly one obtains the standard wavetable synthesis. But even other waveforms or not an accordingly adjusted sawtooth may be used to obtain special effects (e.g. picking out only a fraction of the complete wave). A second ADC (normally controlled by a modulation signal, e.g. from an ADSR or LFO or ...) is used to generate the higher addresses for the EPROM. This control voltage is used to scan through the different waves. Switching from one wave to the next can be independent from ADC#1 or triggered by ADC#1 (e.g. waveform switching is allowed only at the maximum or minimum value 0/63). In the first case the wave can be altered even in the middle of a waveform. In the second case the end of the wave has to be reached to allow the switching to a new wave. Finally a rotary switch (e.g. with 16 positions) can be used to select a waveform set. The module could be used also as a CV processor if ADC#1 is fed not with an audio signal (e.g. sawtooth) but a slowly changing control voltage (e.g. ADSR or LFO). As said before: not very complicated from the technical point of view. But without good wavetables it's nothing ... And we do not want to get troubles with wavetable copyrights (provided that there are copyright) Best wishes Dieter Doepfer (P.S. Maybe we have a lawyer in the group who knows details)
2007-11-21 by Daniel Ornelas
> As said before: not very complicated from the technical point of > view. But > without good wavetables it's nothing ... Between all the people on this group and maybe a contest of sorts on doepfer.de, I'm sure a healthy selection of good wavetables can be generated. Just an idea! Daniel Ornelas
2007-11-21 by mritenburg
Thank you for the detailed explanation! Is this "non-linear transfer function" different than using a wavetable as a waveshaper? --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <hardware@...> wrote:
> > > Is there a way to add the non-linear transfer function as an add-on > module? > > The miniwave module does the non-linear transfer. And that's how > it's working.
2007-11-22 by hardware@doepfer.de
> Thank you for the detailed explanation! > > Is this "non-linear transfer function" different than using a > wavetable as a waveshaper? No. If a sawtooth is used as input it represents the linear input (i.e. linear increasing input values 0...63). For each input value anoutput value is stored in the EEPROM and converted into an anlog voltage by a DAC. If you use a sawtooth as input (or a high-speed VCO that is used to trigger a 6 bit counter to generate the addresses for the look-up table) one obtains wavetable synthesis. But it can be treated also as a waveshaper with sawtooth (i.e. linear) input. Only if another waveform or an amplified/attenuated/offset sawtooth is used the waveshaping becomes more obvious. In other words: if the wavetable is not changed dynamically it's indeed nothing but a waveshaper. The main difference to an analog waveshaper (like the A-137 wave multiplier or the A-136 waveshaper) is the digital, non-continuous behaviour: only 6 bit/64 input steps and 8 bit/256 output steps. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer