> Thank you for the detailed explanation! > > Is this "non-linear transfer function" different than using a > wavetable as a waveshaper? No. If a sawtooth is used as input it represents the linear input (i.e. linear increasing input values 0...63). For each input value anoutput value is stored in the EEPROM and converted into an anlog voltage by a DAC. If you use a sawtooth as input (or a high-speed VCO that is used to trigger a 6 bit counter to generate the addresses for the look-up table) one obtains wavetable synthesis. But it can be treated also as a waveshaper with sawtooth (i.e. linear) input. Only if another waveform or an amplified/attenuated/offset sawtooth is used the waveshaping becomes more obvious. In other words: if the wavetable is not changed dynamically it's indeed nothing but a waveshaper. The main difference to an analog waveshaper (like the A-137 wave multiplier or the A-136 waveshaper) is the digital, non-continuous behaviour: only 6 bit/64 input steps and 8 bit/256 output steps. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer
Message
AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Doepfer miniwave
2007-11-22 by hardware@doepfer.de
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.