Doepfer

Hi John,

I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite 
busy at work.

I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?)

At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version, with any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the 
next 2 weeks!

Godspeed
~Danny

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
> Hey guys,
> Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for so many users. 
> Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
> 
> Best Regards,
> John
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
> >
> > Howdy,
> > 
> > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just  
> > acquired this module :)
> > 
> > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> > 
> > ~Danny
> > 
> > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@...>  
> > <hardware@...> wrote:
> > 
> > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> > >> their former users.
> > >
> > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by the
> > > members of this group !
> > >
> > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we  
> > > have no
> > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I have
> > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on our
> > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no  
> > > short-term
> > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program  
> > > such a
> > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> > >
> > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> > >
> > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a  
> > > discussion on a
> > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for  
> > > the
> > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you  
> > > cannot accuse
> > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in  
> > > mind that
> > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3  
> > > (8051
> > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even  
> > > the
> > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit  
> > > display) limit
> > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even  
> > > with the
> > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> > >
> > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> > >
> > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > Daniel Ornelas
> > danny@...
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>