Doepfer

Getting the 303 sound, is more about "getting the classic acid 303 sound".
I had one in the 80's and thought it was crap, due to the fact that i
was trying to make basslines (it was after all REALLY called the
Roland Bassline) and it was only upon the arrival of "Aciiiiiid" that
I went OH MY GOD.
SO yes 20 percent is the filter (But in my humble opinion you can do
it with any high resonance setting on almost any filter)
20 percent is the slidy sequencer thing...
but 60 percent of THAT ACID SOUND is distort the shit out of it!!

Yep.. easy as that, take a square wave into a filter, (no modulation
or adsr modulation please) set Q high but NOT quite oscilating, and
distort. with a fuzz pedal, or modular equivalent. Now, grab that freq
control and twist... Aciiiiid!!!
you will never get exactly the right sound without a 303, but you can
get the same effect with anything and a fuzzbox!!!

IMHO of course


mark

--
www.markfrancombe.com
www.looop.no

There's a difference between 'classic' smooth bubbly acid and dancey 
distorted acid. It's true many analog synths can do distorted basslines 
but I only know 3 clones that sound like a real 303:
Analogue Solutions Trans-Bass-Xpress Bassline TB-X TB-303 
Adafruit x0xb0x
AudioRealism BassLine 2 (soft synth)

My friend has a real 303 and after many tests with other clones/synths 
(basstation, mc202, syntechno teebee, freebass, rebirth, etc) and if 
you need a 303 I would recommend a xoxbox, they are bang on.

I am yet to hear the doepfer 303 filter in action, if anyone has any 
audio samples I'd like to hear them.

John.

I just picked up a USED A-112 and on arrival I noticed 2 things that troubled me... 

One lead off the battery has corroded a bit and snapped from the battery terminal.
I replaced the lead and soldered it directly to the battery terminal. The battery reads 3.8V with no load.

Should I be concerned that there was corrosion on the battery lead, or is this common. The unit looks to be pretty old, and has alot of wear. Perhaps it was not properly stored at some point???

A cap that was soldered to the backside of the unit has broken from one of it's connections. This had to have happened during packing as the bubble wrap was very tightly wrapped around the module. It appeared to have been connected across the pins of the "LP ON" jumper. I reconnected.

I just want to confirm that I have reconnected the cap in the correct position.

Thanx a heap!


Tony

_________________________________________________________________
Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live.Download today it's FREE!
http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_sharelife_112007

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

wow, that was some time ago I completely forgot. Good memory Mr 
Siros! I've checked my old emails and can't find it but I do remember 
it slightly now thinking it was a nice sounding filter, not a 303 but 
a nice filter. But then as Ingo said, it takes alot more than the 
filter to recreate the 303.


John
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk






--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros 
<synth_freak_2000@...> wrote:
>
> hello john,
> 
> you probable have forgotten that, some years ago, i
> sent you an audio file of a recording of an a100 patch
> using the a103 filter and you told me that you really
> like the 103 filter sound a lot!
> 
> best regards,   :-)
> Bakis.
> 
> 
> --- jmaddocks1975 <jmaddocks1975@...> wrote:
> 
> > There's a difference between 'classic' smooth bubbly
> > acid and dancey 
> > distorted acid. It's true many analog synths can do
> > distorted basslines 
> > but I only know 3 clones that sound like a real 303:
> > Analogue Solutions Trans-Bass-Xpress Bassline TB-X
> > TB-303 
> > Adafruit x0xb0x
> > AudioRealism BassLine 2 (soft synth)
> > 
> > My friend has a real 303 and after many tests with
> > other clones/synths 
> > (basstation, mc202, syntechno teebee, freebass,
> > rebirth, etc) and if 
> > you need a 303 I would recommend a xoxbox, they are
> > bang on.
> > 
> > I am yet to hear the doepfer 303 filter in action,
> > if anyone has any 
> > audio samples I'd like to hear them.
> > 
> > John.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner
> http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com
> http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic
> http://www.myspace.com/interconnectedmusic
> http://www.myspace.com/memorygeist
> http://www.DiN.org.uk
> http://www.musicamaximamagnetica.com
> http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
> http://www.rubber.gr
> Athens-Greece
> 
> 
>       
______________________________________________________________________
______________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>

hello john,

you probable have forgotten that, some years ago, i
sent you an audio file of a recording of an a100 patch
using the a103 filter and you told me that you really
like the 103 filter sound a lot!

best regards,   :-)
Bakis.


--- jmaddocks1975 <jmaddocks1975@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> There's a difference between 'classic' smooth bubbly
> acid and dancey 
> distorted acid. It's true many analog synths can do
> distorted basslines 
> but I only know 3 clones that sound like a real 303:
> Analogue Solutions Trans-Bass-Xpress Bassline TB-X
> TB-303 
> Adafruit x0xb0x
> AudioRealism BassLine 2 (soft synth)
> 
> My friend has a real 303 and after many tests with
> other clones/synths 
> (basstation, mc202, syntechno teebee, freebass,
> rebirth, etc) and if 
> you need a 303 I would recommend a xoxbox, they are
> bang on.
> 
> I am yet to hear the doepfer 303 filter in action,
> if anyone has any 
> audio samples I'd like to hear them.
> 
> John.
> 
> 


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com
http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic
http://www.myspace.com/interconnectedmusic
http://www.myspace.com/memorygeist
http://www.DiN.org.uk
http://www.musicamaximamagnetica.com
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.rubber.gr
Athens-Greece


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Here are 2 interesting links on what is contributing to the sound of a 303
http://www.firstpr.com.au/rwi/dfish/303-unique.html
http://bulldog.unca.edu/~azgaynes/roland.TB-303.schem-8.gif

Tony
It would probably be cheaper to return the item to the seller and buy  
a brand new A-112

cheers Dave

On 11/12/2007, at 9:20 AM, Anthony Rolando wrote:

>
> I just picked up a USED A-112 and on arrival I noticed 2 things  
> that troubled me...
>
> One lead off the battery has corroded a bit and snapped from the  
> battery terminal.
> I replaced the lead and soldered it directly to the battery  
> terminal. The battery reads 3.8V with no load.
>
> Should I be concerned that there was corrosion on the battery lead,  
> or is this common. The unit looks to be pretty old, and has alot of  
> wear. Perhaps it was not properly stored at some point???
>
> A cap that was soldered to the backside of the unit has broken from  
> one of it's connections. This had to have happened during packing  
> as the bubble wrap was very tightly wrapped around the module. It  
> appeared to have been connected across the pins of the "LP ON"  
> jumper. I reconnected.
>
> I just want to confirm that I have reconnected the cap in the  
> correct position.
>
> Thanx a heap!
>
> Tony
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live.Download today  
> it's FREE!
> http://www.windowslive.com/share.html? 
> ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_sharelife_112007
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

very interesting, thanks for the links.

i cannot recall exactly from where i got the info, but
i think that also the slide circuit is somewhat unique.
a special ic was used for this, which is unavailable
for many years now. but again i cannot recall what
made it special, maybe a strange response curve.
probably there are some ways to mimic that slide circuit,
because it was not mentioned in the devilfish posting.

best wishes

ingo



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ilanode" <techmeier@...> wrote:
>
> Here are 2 interesting links on what is contributing to the sound 
of a 303

> http://www.firstpr.com.au/rwi/dfish/303-unique.html
> http://bulldog.unca.edu/~azgaynes/roland.TB-303.schem-8.gif
>

Tony,

you find my comments written inline.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

> I just picked up a USED A-112 and on arrival I noticed 2 things
> that troubled me...
>
> One lead off the battery has corroded a bit and snapped from the
> battery terminal.
> I replaced the lead and soldered it directly to the battery
> terminal. The battery reads 3.8V with no load.
> Should I be concerned that there was corrosion on the battery
> lead, or is this common. The unit looks to be pretty old, and has
> alot of wear. Perhaps it was not properly stored at some point???

Though the voltage of the battery seems to be OK I'd recommend to replace it
betimes. The reported corrosion is an indication that the part should be
replaced. It is available as a spare part from your local Doepfer
representative.
>
> A cap that was soldered to the backside of the unit has broken
> from one of it's connections. This had to have happened during
> packing as the bubble wrap was very tightly wrapped around the
> module. It appeared to have been connected across the pins of the
> "LP ON" jumper. I reconnected.

You are right: this additional capacitor has to be soldered across the
jumper J1.

> I just want to confirm that I have reconnected the cap in the
> correct position.
>
> Thanx a heap!
>
> Tony

hi,

try putting your adsr through a slew limiter. i'm not promising a 303,
but you'll notice how much of the "sound" is indeed due to the
envelopes, as claimed in those links. you get a less exponential curve
which, for my tastes anyway, makes a huge improvement to many classic
subtractive sounds, especially acidic ones.

(another thing is to feed the filter back into its own cv2 input - i
use an a122 and don't have an a103, and still it can (!) sound very
acidy.)

stu

That does not indicate that they could sell a sufficient number of
them. A Roland employee once made clear in Analogue Heaven that for a
large company like Roland it is not economical to serve a niche market.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Bulog <d2ba@...> wrote:

>
> Im surprised that Roland does not make a limited production run of  
> the TB-303 again
> They are selling for US$2000 on ebay
> 
> 
> On 11/12/2007, at 11:28 PM, <hardware@...> wrote:
> 
> > > very interesting, thanks for the links.
> > >
> > > i cannot recall exactly from where i got the info, but
> > > i think that also the slide circuit is somewhat unique.
> > > a special ic was used for this, which is unavailable
> > > for many years now. but again i cannot recall what
> > > made it special, maybe a strange response curve.
> > > probably there are some ways to mimic that slide circuit,
> > > because it was not mentioned in the devilfish posting.
> > >
> > > best wishes
> > >
> > > ingo
> >
> > Another special feature of the 303 was a dual potentiometer for the
> > resonance (i.e. two potentiometers with one common axis). The first
> > potentiometer was used to control the resonance, the second  
> > (simultaneously)
> > the envelope amount applied to the filter frequency (post the ACCENT
> > control). In addition this second potentiometer was not wired in  
> > the usual
> > way as an attenuator (with one terminal connected to GND) but kind  
> > of "AC
> > coupled GND": the terminal that is normally directly connected to  
> > GND was
> > connected via a 1uF capacitor to GND.
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

> very interesting, thanks for the links.
>
> i cannot recall exactly from where i got the info, but
> i think that also the slide circuit is somewhat unique.
> a special ic was used for this, which is unavailable
> for many years now. but again i cannot recall what
> made it special, maybe a strange response curve.
> probably there are some ways to mimic that slide circuit,
> because it was not mentioned in the devilfish posting.
>
> best wishes
>
> ingo

Another special feature of the 303 was a dual potentiometer for the
resonance (i.e. two potentiometers with one common axis). The first
potentiometer was used to control the resonance, the second (simultaneously)
the envelope amount applied to the filter frequency (post the ACCENT
control). In addition this second potentiometer was not wired in the usual
way as an attenuator (with one terminal connected to GND) but kind of "AC
coupled GND": the terminal that is normally directly connected to GND was
connected via a 1uF capacitor to GND.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

Im surprised that Roland does not make a limited production run of  
the TB-303 again
They are selling for US$2000 on ebay


On 11/12/2007, at 11:28 PM, <hardware@doepfer.de> wrote:

> > very interesting, thanks for the links.
> >
> > i cannot recall exactly from where i got the info, but
> > i think that also the slide circuit is somewhat unique.
> > a special ic was used for this, which is unavailable
> > for many years now. but again i cannot recall what
> > made it special, maybe a strange response curve.
> > probably there are some ways to mimic that slide circuit,
> > because it was not mentioned in the devilfish posting.
> >
> > best wishes
> >
> > ingo
>
> Another special feature of the 303 was a dual potentiometer for the
> resonance (i.e. two potentiometers with one common axis). The first
> potentiometer was used to control the resonance, the second  
> (simultaneously)
> the envelope amount applied to the filter frequency (post the ACCENT
> control). In addition this second potentiometer was not wired in  
> the usual
> way as an attenuator (with one terminal connected to GND) but kind  
> of "AC
> coupled GND": the terminal that is normally directly connected to  
> GND was
> connected via a 1uF capacitor to GND.
>
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample dumps  
into a A-112 Sampler
I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
How useful is this module in general

thanks in advance
Dave

I wanted a mac version too but couldn't find anything. I've 
seen 'virtual PC' software so you can run windows software on macs, not 
sure how stable they are though, anyone used one?
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/virtualpc/virtualpc.aspx?
pid=virtualpc

The A112 module is awesome - wavetable synthesis, delay effect, 
sampler. I'm still getting to grips with the wavetable side of it 
though.

John
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk




--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Bulog <d2ba@...> wrote:

>
> Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample dumps  
> into a A-112 Sampler
> I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
> How useful is this module in general
> 
> thanks in advance
> Dave
>

thanks John
Is this usable without a PC then?
On 12/12/2007, at 2:01 AM, jmaddocks1975 wrote:

> I wanted a mac version too but couldn't find anything. I've
> seen 'virtual PC' software so you can run windows software on macs,  
> not
> sure how stable they are though, anyone used one?
> http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/virtualpc/virtualpc.aspx?
> pid=virtualpc
>
> The A112 module is awesome - wavetable synthesis, delay effect,
> sampler. I'm still getting to grips with the wavetable side of it
> though.
>
> John
> http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Bulog <d2ba@...> wrote:
> >
> > Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample dumps
> > into a A-112 Sampler
> > I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
> > How useful is this module in general
> >
> > thanks in advance
> > Dave
> >
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Yes, the module is usable without a PC.
You can record sounds striaght in using the audio in socket, the 
effects and wavetable side is usable with a PC too. You only need the 
software to upload 'edited' samples and proper wavetables.

I wonder if any other software works with the module?
The samples are only upoaded by SysEx.


John.



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Bulog <d2ba@...> wrote:
>
> thanks John
> Is this usable without a PC then?
> On 12/12/2007, at 2:01 AM, jmaddocks1975 wrote:
> 
> > I wanted a mac version too but couldn't find anything. I've
> > seen 'virtual PC' software so you can run windows software on 
macs,  
> > not
> > sure how stable they are though, anyone used one?
> > http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/virtualpc/virtualpc.aspx?
> > pid=virtualpc
> >
> > The A112 module is awesome - wavetable synthesis, delay effect,
> > sampler. I'm still getting to grips with the wavetable side of it
> > though.
> >
> > John
> > http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Bulog <d2ba@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample 
dumps

> > > into a A-112 Sampler
> > > I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
> > > How useful is this module in general
> > >
> > > thanks in advance
> > > Dave
> > >
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Yes, I agree. the module is useful without access to a Windows machine, PC.

It makes a great phrase sampler/ looper. Very quick to set the loop points, you can modulate the sample rate for cool effects etc...

In my opinion, the module is harder to use then the Blacet Miniwave,
but the ability to record your own wavetables is very exciting to me,
and definitely a step beyond what could be done with the miniwave.

I am still trying to get my head around creating a good wavetable from scratch. It involves sending a CV to the wave page control while recording in order to get a sound recorded onto a series of pages. I think there are alot of possibilities with this feature... possibilities that go beyond the Classic wavetable sounds (PPG, Miniwave etc...).

I think the module could also make a great CV source, though I have not had time to try this yet (just got mine).

The effects are cool sounding, but you will need a spare mixer and VCA to really make use of them. Still they do sound cool, and for those with larger system, I am sure a mixer and a VCA will be available. If you have a smaller system, I would not count on getting much use from the EFFECTs feature on the A-112.


Tony


> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> From: jmaddocks1975@yahoo.co.uk
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:21:27 +0000
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
> 
> Yes, the module is usable without a PC.
> You can record sounds striaght in using the audio in socket, the 
> effects and wavetable side is usable with a PC too. You only need the 
> software to upload 'edited' samples and proper wavetables.
> 
> I wonder if any other software works with the module?
> The samples are only upoaded by SysEx.
> 
> 
> John.
> 
> 
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Bulog <d2ba@...> wrote:
> >
> > thanks John
> > Is this usable without a PC then?
> > On 12/12/2007, at 2:01 AM, jmaddocks1975 wrote:
> > 
> > > I wanted a mac version too but couldn't find anything. I've
> > > seen 'virtual PC' software so you can run windows software on 
> macs,  
> > > not
> > > sure how stable they are though, anyone used one?
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/virtualpc/virtualpc.aspx?
> > > pid=virtualpc
> > >
> > > The A112 module is awesome - wavetable synthesis, delay effect,
> > > sampler. I'm still getting to grips with the wavetable side of it
> > > though.
> > >
> > > John
> > > http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Bulog <d2ba@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample 
> dumps
> > > > into a A-112 Sampler
> > > > I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
> > > > How useful is this module in general
> > > >
> > > > thanks in advance
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
The best games are on Xbox 360.  Click here for a special offer on an Xbox 360 Console.
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/hardware/wheretobuy/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I brought up OS X compatibility through a Windows emulator (Parallels
Desktop) a couple of months ago and the general consensus was that it would
not work. I should try and fiddle with it anyway but I¹ve been too busy. It
seems like we shouldn¹t expect OS X compatibility unless there is a
developer around here that is willing to port it.

    Regards,
    John


On 12/11/07 10:11 AM, "Anthony Rolando" <goldenechos@hotmail.com> wrote:

>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, I agree. the module is useful without access to a Windows machine, PC.
> 
> It makes a great phrase sampler/ looper. Very quick to set the loop points,
> you can modulate the sample rate for cool effects etc...
> 
> In my opinion, the module is harder to use then the Blacet Miniwave,
> but the ability to record your own wavetables is very exciting to me,
> and definitely a step beyond what could be done with the miniwave.
> 
> I am still trying to get my head around creating a good wavetable from
> scratch. It involves sending a CV to the wave page control while recording in
> order to get a sound recorded onto a series of pages. I think there are alot
> of possibilities with this feature... possibilities that go beyond the Classic
> wavetable sounds (PPG, Miniwave etc...).
> 
> I think the module could also make a great CV source, though I have not had
> time to try this yet (just got mine).
> 
> The effects are cool sounding, but you will need a spare mixer and VCA to
> really make use of them. Still they do sound cool, and for those with larger
> system, I am sure a mixer and a VCA will be available. If you have a smaller
> system, I would not count on getting much use from the EFFECTs feature on the
> A-112.
> 
> Tony
> 
>> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
>> > From: jmaddocks1975@yahoo.co.uk <mailto:jmaddocks1975%40yahoo.co.uk>
>> > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:21:27 +0000
>> > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
>> > 
>> > Yes, the module is usable without a PC.
>> > You can record sounds striaght in using the audio in socket, the
>> > effects and wavetable side is usable with a PC too. You only need the
>> > software to upload 'edited' samples and proper wavetables.
>> > 
>> > I wonder if any other software works with the module?
>> > The samples are only upoaded by SysEx.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > John.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
>> , David Bulog <d2ba@...> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > thanks John
>>> > > Is this usable without a PC then?
>>> > > On 12/12/2007, at 2:01 AM, jmaddocks1975 wrote:
>>> > > 
>>>> > > > I wanted a mac version too but couldn't find anything. I've
>>>> > > > seen 'virtual PC' software so you can run windows software on
>> > macs,  
>>>> > > > not
>>>> > > > sure how stable they are though, anyone used one?
>>>> > > > http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/virtualpc/virtualpc.aspx?
>>>> > > > pid=virtualpc
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > The A112 module is awesome - wavetable synthesis, delay effect,
>>>> > > > sampler. I'm still getting to grips with the wavetable side of it
>>>> > > > though.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > John
>>>> > > > http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>>>> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> , David Bulog <d2ba@> wrote:
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample
>> > dumps
>>>>> > > > > into a A-112 Sampler
>>>>> > > > > I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
>>>>> > > > > How useful is this module in general
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > thanks in advance
>>>>> > > > > Dave
>>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > 
>>> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>> > >
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> The best games are on Xbox 360.  Click here for a special offer on an Xbox 360
> Console.
> http://www.xbox.com/en-US/hardware/wheretobuy/
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
>  
>     




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Is there anyone that can share some mp3 of work they have done with  
A-112
please send file via yousendit.com to
d2ba@xtra.co.nz

thanks Dave


On 12/12/2007, at 6:02 AM, John wrote:

> I brought up OS X compatibility through a Windows emulator (Parallels
> Desktop) a couple of months ago and the general consensus was that  
> it would
> not work. I should try and fiddle with it anyway but I¹ve been too  
> busy. It
> seems like we shouldn¹t expect OS X compatibility unless there is a
> developer around here that is willing to port it.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> On 12/11/07 10:11 AM, "Anthony Rolando" <goldenechos@hotmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, I agree. the module is useful without access to a Windows  
> machine, PC.
> >
> > It makes a great phrase sampler/ looper. Very quick to set the  
> loop points,
> > you can modulate the sample rate for cool effects etc...
> >
> > In my opinion, the module is harder to use then the Blacet Miniwave,
> > but the ability to record your own wavetables is very exciting to  
> me,
> > and definitely a step beyond what could be done with the miniwave.
> >
> > I am still trying to get my head around creating a good wavetable  
> from
> > scratch. It involves sending a CV to the wave page control while  
> recording in
> > order to get a sound recorded onto a series of pages. I think  
> there are alot
> > of possibilities with this feature... possibilities that go  
> beyond the Classic
> > wavetable sounds (PPG, Miniwave etc...).
> >
> > I think the module could also make a great CV source, though I  
> have not had
> > time to try this yet (just got mine).
> >
> > The effects are cool sounding, but you will need a spare mixer  
> and VCA to
> > really make use of them. Still they do sound cool, and for those  
> with larger
> > system, I am sure a mixer and a VCA will be available. If you  
> have a smaller
> > system, I would not count on getting much use from the EFFECTs  
> feature on the
> > A-112.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Doepfer_a100% 
> 40yahoogroups.com>
> >> > From: jmaddocks1975@yahoo.co.uk <mailto:jmaddocks1975% 
> 40yahoo.co.uk>
> >> > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:21:27 +0000
> >> > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
> >> >
> >> > Yes, the module is usable without a PC.
> >> > You can record sounds striaght in using the audio in socket, the
> >> > effects and wavetable side is usable with a PC too. You only  
> need the
> >> > software to upload 'edited' samples and proper wavetables.
> >> >
> >> > I wonder if any other software works with the module?
> >> > The samples are only upoaded by SysEx.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > John.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Doepfer_a100% 
> 40yahoogroups.com>
> >> , David Bulog <d2ba@...> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > thanks John
> >>> > > Is this usable without a PC then?
> >>> > > On 12/12/2007, at 2:01 AM, jmaddocks1975 wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>>> > > > I wanted a mac version too but couldn't find anything. I've
> >>>> > > > seen 'virtual PC' software so you can run windows  
> software on
> >> > macs,
> >>>> > > > not
> >>>> > > > sure how stable they are though, anyone used one?
> >>>> > > > http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/virtualpc/ 
> virtualpc.aspx?
> >>>> > > > pid=virtualpc
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > The A112 module is awesome - wavetable synthesis, delay  
> effect,
> >>>> > > > sampler. I'm still getting to grips with the wavetable  
> side of it
> >>>> > > > though.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > John
> >>>> > > > http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> >>>> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> , David Bulog <d2ba@>  
> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > >
> >>>>> > > > > Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to  
> do sample
> >> > dumps
> >>>>> > > > > into a A-112 Sampler
> >>>>> > > > > I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
> >>>>> > > > > How useful is this module in general
> >>>>> > > > >
> >>>>> > > > > thanks in advance
> >>>>> > > > > Dave
> >>>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > The best games are on Xbox 360. Click here for a special offer on  
> an Xbox 360
> > Console.
> > http://www.xbox.com/en-US/hardware/wheretobuy/
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

No

Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping their former users.

Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome machine instead of a decorative item.

I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster ( What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )

Hans





> Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample dumps
> into a A-112 Sampler
> I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
> How useful is this module in general
> 
> thanks in advance
> Dave
> 
> 
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Noticias
http://noticias.msn.es/comunidad.aspx

sure, i guess thats the reason why a large community of users
enjoy their a100 system. they even keep adding more of that
stuff, only because it's all unusable. and the most unbelievable
thing is, that they keep on being friendly to each other.
we live in such a strange world. do you get the irony?




--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Hans Greuber <turbotron69@...> 
wrote:
>
> 
> No
> 
> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV whatever 
or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping their former 
users.
> 
> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome 
machine instead of a decorative item.
> 
> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster ( 
What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample 
dumps

> > into a A-112 Sampler
> > I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
> > How useful is this module in general
> > 
> > thanks in advance
> > Dave
> > 
> > 
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Noticias
> http://noticias.msn.es/comunidad.aspx
>

Palm D'Or Troll Award 2007!

--Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Hans Greuber
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:30 AM
To: doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question


No

Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV whatever or
cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping their former users.

Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome machine instead
of a decorative item.

I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster ( What about a
CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )

Hans





> Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample dumps
> into a A-112 Sampler
> I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
> How useful is this module in general
> 
> thanks in advance
> Dave
> 
> 
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Noticias
http://noticias.msn.es/comunidad.aspx

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

Be aware of the " light" on your pirate virtual modular crap!

Best;

Hans
> 
> Palm D'Or Troll Award 2007!
> 
> --Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Hans Greuber
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:30 AM
> To: doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
> 
> No
> 
> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV whatever or
> cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping their former users.
> 
> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome machine instead
> of a decorative item.
> 
> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster ( What about a
> CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> 
> Hans
> 
>> Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample dumps
>> into a A-112 Sampler
>> I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
>> How useful is this module in general
>>
>> thanks in advance
>> Dave
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________
> MSN Noticias
> http://noticias.msn.es/comunidad.aspx
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
_________________________________________________________________
Tecnología, moda, motor, viajes,…suscríbete a nuestros boletines para estar siempre a la última
Guapos y guapas, clips musicales y estrenos de cine.

????

Palm de Zinc Incomprehensible Message Award 2007!

--Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Hans Greuber
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 12:11 PM
To: doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question


Be aware of the " light" on your pirate virtual modular crap!

Best;

Hans
> 
> Palm D'Or Troll Award 2007!
> 
> --Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
On
> Behalf Of Hans Greuber
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:30 AM
> To: doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
> 
> No
> 
> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV whatever or
> cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping their former users.
> 
> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome machine
instead
> of a decorative item.
> 
> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster ( What about
a
> CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> 
> Hans
> 
>> Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample dumps
>> into a A-112 Sampler
>> I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
>> How useful is this module in general
>>
>> thanks in advance
>> Dave
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________
> MSN Noticias
> http://noticias.msn.es/comunidad.aspx
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
_________________________________________________________________
Tecnología, moda, motor, viajes,
suscríbete a nuestros boletines para estar
siempre a la última
Guapos y guapas, clips musicales y estrenos de cine. 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

Palm D´or retarded of the year 2007


Meanwhile... Be careful with your virtual modular pirated cheapo PC program,jacks can give you an  electrocution....

Hans


________________________________
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> From: vogelscheiss@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:21:21 -0500
> Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
> 
> 
> ????
> 
> Palm de Zinc Incomprehensible Message Award 2007!
> 
> --Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Hans Greuber
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 12:11 PM
> To: doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
> 
> Be aware of the " light" on your pirate virtual modular crap!
> 
> Best;
> 
> Hans
>>
>> Palm D'Or Troll Award 2007!
>>
>> --Chuck
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
> On
>> Behalf Of Hans Greuber
>> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:30 AM
>> To: doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
>>
>> No
>>
>> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV whatever or
>> cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping their former users.
>>
>> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome machine
> instead
>> of a decorative item.
>>
>> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster ( What about
> a
>> CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>> Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel to do sample dumps
>>> into a A-112 Sampler
>>> I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
>>> How useful is this module in general
>>>
>>> thanks in advance
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>> __________________________________________________________
>> MSN Noticias
>> http://noticias.msn.es/comunidad.aspx
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________
> Tecnología, moda, motor, viajes,…suscríbete a nuestros boletines para estar
> siempre a la última
> Guapos y guapas, clips musicales y estrenos de cine.
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Noticias
http://noticias.msn.es/comunidad.aspx

> > I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> > What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> 
> Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)


i would buy one and make a whole album using only that module
just to prove that hans is wrong :-)

> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> their former users.

Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by the
members of this group !

We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we have no
programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I have
mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on our
website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no short-term
solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program such a
software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.

> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> machine instead of a decorative item.

If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a discussion on a
civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for the
MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you cannot accuse
us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in mind that
there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3 (8051
derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even the
available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit display) limit
the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even with the
current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.

> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )

Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, <hardware@...> wrote:
> > I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> > What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> 
> Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> 
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>

I'm interested, but only if you offer the CV controlled coffee maker
accessory.

Cheers,
Adam-V

Howdy,

I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just  
acquired this module :)

Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!

~Danny

On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@doepfer.de>  
<hardware@doepfer.de> wrote:

>> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
>> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
>> their former users.
>
> Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by the
> members of this group !
>
> We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we  
> have no
> programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I have
> mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on our
> website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no  
> short-term
> solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program  
> such a
> software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
>
>> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
>> machine instead of a decorative item.
>
> If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a  
> discussion on a
> civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for  
> the
> MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you  
> cannot accuse
> us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in  
> mind that
> there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3  
> (8051
> derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even  
> the
> available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit  
> display) limit
> the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even  
> with the
> current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
>
>> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
>> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
>
> Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
>
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Daniel Ornelas
danny@anadeji.com

Quoting Daniel Ornelas <danny@anadeji.com>:

> Howdy,
> 
> I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I
> just  
> acquired this module :)

I wouldn't do it that way, using fltk and RtMidi and you'd get a crossplatform app (giving linux users a break). If you go this way I have some code lying around that 
uses RtMidi to send sysexes to a synth.
Immanuel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out how you can get spam free email.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/3

indeed!    :-)

--- charles graef <vogelscheiss@gmail.com> wrote:

> Palm D'Or Troll Award 2007!
> 
> --Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Hans Greuber
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:30 AM
> To: doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Doepfer_a100] DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER
> Question
> 
> 
> No
> 
> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules
> as CV whatever or
> cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> their former users.
> 
> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an
> awesome machine instead
> of a decorative item.
> 
> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even
> a toaster ( What about a
> CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Is there any program I can use on OSX 10.4 Intel
> to do sample dumps
> > into a A-112 Sampler
> > I notice there is only one for Win 95 and Win 98
> > How useful is this module in general
> > 
> > thanks in advance
> > Dave
> > 
> > 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> MSN Noticias
> http://noticias.msn.es/comunidad.aspx
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
[Doepfer_a100] group owner
http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com
http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic
http://www.myspace.com/interconnectedmusic
http://www.myspace.com/memorygeist
http://www.DiN.org.uk
http://www.musicamaximamagnetica.com
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.rubber.gr
Athens-Greece


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

>>What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
nothing new. For those who are able to read german, the famous midi 
controlled fryer from Synthesizer Studio Bonn:

http://www.elektropolis.de/ssb_anzeige_85_06.htm

My preferred features are the three sockets: "Schnitzel Out", "Schnitzel 
In" "Schnitzel Thru".

Florian

Ahhhh, life would be so great if everything had a CV input/output...
VC washing machine, VC revolving doors, VC alarmclock...
Now that I have my VC lights (and believe me, LFO on VC lights when
you accelerate and it reaches perception threshold, this thing is
AMAZING !) I wanna control everything with CV.





--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Florian Anwander
<Florian.Anwander@...> wrote:
>
> 
> >>What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> nothing new. For those who are able to read german, the famous midi 
> controlled fryer from Synthesizer Studio Bonn:
> 
> http://www.elektropolis.de/ssb_anzeige_85_06.htm
> 
> My preferred features are the three sockets: "Schnitzel Out",
"Schnitzel 

> In" "Schnitzel Thru".
> 
> Florian
>

Wow! Hope this happens. This would open up a whole new part of the
module for us Mac guys. Thanks Danny.

    Best Regards,
    John


On 12/17/07 2:35 PM, "Daniel Ornelas" <danny@anadeji.com> wrote:

>  
>  
>  
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just
> acquired this module :)
> 
> Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> 
> ~Danny
> 
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@doepfer.de
> <mailto:hardware%40doepfer.de> >
> <hardware@doepfer.de <mailto:hardware%40doepfer.de> > wrote:
> 
>>> >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
>>> >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
>>> >> their former users.
>> >
>> > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by the
>> > members of this group !
>> >
>> > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we
>> > have no
>> > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I have
>> > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on our
>> > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
>> > short-term
>> > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program
>> > such a
>> > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
>> >
>>> >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
>>> >> machine instead of a decorative item.
>> >
>> > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
>> > discussion on a
>> > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for
>> > the
>> > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
>> > cannot accuse
>> > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in
>> > mind that
>> > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3
>> > (8051
>> > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even
>> > the
>> > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
>> > display) limit
>> > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even
>> > with the
>> > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
>> >
>>> >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
>>> >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
>> >
>> > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
>> >
>> > Best wishes
>> > Dieter Doepfer
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
> 
> Daniel Ornelas
> danny@anadeji.com <mailto:danny%40anadeji.com>
> 
>  
>     




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

ok Dieter,

now I understand...
I'm going to create free software MAC OS9 and OSX  for a111, a188,
a155 a154 and all the a143 serie... ;-)

happy everything...

Antonio


> 
> Danny,
> 
> that's very generous. Please contact Christian Assall
> (software-at-doepfer-dot-de) to obtain the specifications for the
A-112 midi
> data transfer. If you will really program a free A-112 Mac dump
loader I'd

> reciprocate with a A-112 for you.
> 
> Thank you
> Dieter Doepfer
>

> Howdy,
>
> I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just
> acquired this module :)
>
> Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
>
> ~Danny

Danny,

that's very generous. Please contact Christian Assall
(software-at-doepfer-dot-de) to obtain the specifications for the A-112 midi
data transfer. If you will really program a free A-112 Mac dump loader I'd
reciprocate with a A-112 for you.

Thank you
Dieter Doepfer

Hi,

seriously:

2007/12/19, atuzzi <antoniotuzzi@tiscali.it>:

> I'm going to create free software MAC OS9 and OSX for a111, a188,
> a155 a154 and all the a143 serie... ;-)
>





...there seems to be demand for a sample-loader for the A-112 in combo with
a Mac; while I think I could provide an interface pretty quick, I am an
absolute dummy regarding SysEx-messages and such, so, if Danny volunteers,
that would be great...

...and: I'd rather write some software for the MAQ 16/3 while were at it ;o)
- even though I find the 143-series also tempting...

Best wishes,
chris


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> that's very generous. Please contact Christian Assall
> (software-at-doepfer-dot-de) to obtain the specifications for the  
> A-112 midi
> data transfer. If you will really program a free A-112 Mac dump  
> loader I'd
> reciprocate with a A-112 for you.

Well thank you for offer, But I'm quite set with one A-112 ;)

I think that a tool that helps others (and myself) is more than an  
adequate reward.

~Danny

Daniel Ornelas
danny@anadeji.com

> ok Dieter,
>
> now I understand...
> I'm going to create free software MAC OS9 and OSX for a111, a188,
> a155 a154 and all the a143 serie... ;-)
>
> happy everything...
>
> Antonio


???

The A-111, A-188-1/2, A-154, A-155 and A-143-x have no interface and cannot
be programmed externally as they are pure analog circuits (except the A-154
which has a microcontroller).

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

...Dieter, read Antonios message - in response to you, offering a free
module - again...

2007/12/19, hardware@doepfer.de <hardware@doepfer.de>:

> > I'm going to create free software MAC OS9 and OSX for a111, a188,
> > a155 a154 and all the a143 serie... ;-)
>



The A-111, A-188-1/2, A-154, A-155 and A-143-x have no interface and cannot
> be programmed externally as they are pure analog circuits (except the
> A-154
> which has a microcontroller).
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

OK. Now I understand.

Dieter Doepfer

> ...Dieter, read Antonios message - in response to you, offering a free
> module - again...
> 
> 2007/12/19, hardware@doepfer.de <hardware@doepfer.de>:
> 
> > > I'm going to create free software MAC OS9 and OSX for a111, a188,
> > > a155 a154 and all the a143 serie... ;-)

Thanks for the update for the MAQ.

mine has been unused for 4 years

Best
________________________________
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> From: henkel.chris@googlemail.com
> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:49:03 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> seriously:
> 
> 2007/12/19, atuzzi>:
> 
>> I'm going to create free software MAC OS9 and OSX for a111, a188,
>> a155 a154 and all the a143 serie... ;-)
>>
> 
> ...there seems to be demand for a sample-loader for the A-112 in combo with
> a Mac; while I think I could provide an interface pretty quick, I am an
> absolute dummy regarding SysEx-messages and such, so, if Danny volunteers,
> that would be great...
> 
> ...and: I'd rather write some software for the MAQ 16/3 while were at it ;o)
> - even though I find the 143-series also tempting...
> 
> Best wishes,
> chris
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
_________________________________________________________________
Tecnología, moda, motor, viajes,…suscríbete a nuestros boletines para estar siempre a la última
http://newsletters.msn.com/hm/maintenanceeses.asp?L=ES&C=ES&P=WCMaintenance&Brand=WL&RU=http%3a%2f%2fmail.live.com

Hey guys,
Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for so many users. 
Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?

Best Regards,
John

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:

>
> Howdy,
> 
> I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just  
> acquired this module :)
> 
> Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> 
> ~Danny
> 
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@...>  
> <hardware@...> wrote:
> 
> >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> >> their former users.
> >
> > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by the
> > members of this group !
> >
> > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we  
> > have no
> > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I have
> > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on our
> > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no  
> > short-term
> > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program  
> > such a
> > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> >
> >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> >
> > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a  
> > discussion on a
> > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for  
> > the
> > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you  
> > cannot accuse
> > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in  
> > mind that
> > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3  
> > (8051
> > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even  
> > the
> > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit  
> > display) limit
> > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even  
> > with the
> > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> >
> >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> >
> > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Daniel Ornelas
> danny@...
>

Hi John,

I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite 
busy at work.

I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?)

At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version, with any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the 
next 2 weeks!

Godspeed
~Danny

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
> Hey guys,
> Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for so many users. 
> Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
> 
> Best Regards,
> John
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
> >
> > Howdy,
> > 
> > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just  
> > acquired this module :)
> > 
> > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> > 
> > ~Danny
> > 
> > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@...>  
> > <hardware@...> wrote:
> > 
> > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> > >> their former users.
> > >
> > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by the
> > > members of this group !
> > >
> > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we  
> > > have no
> > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I have
> > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on our
> > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no  
> > > short-term
> > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program  
> > > such a
> > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> > >
> > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> > >
> > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a  
> > > discussion on a
> > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for  
> > > the
> > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you  
> > > cannot accuse
> > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in  
> > > mind that
> > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3  
> > > (8051
> > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even  
> > > the
> > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit  
> > > display) limit
> > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even  
> > > with the
> > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> > >
> > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> > >
> > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > Daniel Ornelas
> > danny@...
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>

Quoting Daniel Ornelas <danny@anadeji.com>:

> Hi John,
> 
> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic
> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite 
> busy at work.
> 
> I believe someone else on the list had something working also
> (anyone?)
> 
> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows
> version, with any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the 
> next 2 weeks!

I have it running but it still needs some cleanup before I can send it. Mine is probably nothing like the windows version which I never saw in the first place. I ran into some problems with 
1) the midi library I was using -- didn't work for large sysexes!
2) the GUI library I was using.
3) the doepfer modules I had ordered to do testing. (they work great but were delivered a only last week).
I'll try to deliver something this weekend. If you want to use it *as it is* to compare stuff I can send it to you.
Immanuel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out how you can get spam free email.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/3

So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did everyone drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software for Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would happen already! :)

-John

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:

>
> Hi John,
> 
> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite 
> busy at work.
> 
> I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?)
> 
> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version, with any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the 
> next 2 weeks!
> 
> Godspeed
> ~Danny
> 
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for so many users. 
> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > John
> > 
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Howdy,
> > > 
> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just  
> > > acquired this module :)
> > > 
> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> > > 
> > > ~Danny
> > > 
> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>  
> > > <hardware@> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> > > >> their former users.
> > > >
> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by the
> > > > members of this group !
> > > >
> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we  
> > > > have no
> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I have
> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on our
> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no  
> > > > short-term
> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program  
> > > > such a
> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> > > >
> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> > > >
> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a  
> > > > discussion on a
> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for  
> > > > the
> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you  
> > > > cannot accuse
> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in  
> > > > mind that
> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3  
> > > > (8051
> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even  
> > > > the
> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit  
> > > > display) limit
> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even  
> > > > with the
> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> > > >
> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> > > >
> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes
> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Daniel Ornelas
> > > danny@
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> >
>

to have this on OS X would be sweet..
Is it anywhere near finished?

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, j_inform3r <abstract.express@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at
> least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did everyone
> drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software for
> Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would happen
> already! :)
>
> -John
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic
>> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite
>> busy at work.
>>
>> I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?)
>>
>> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version, with
>> any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the
>> next 2 weeks!
>>
>> Godspeed
>> ~Danny
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
>> > Hey guys,
>> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for so
>> > many users.
>> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > John
>> >
>> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Howdy,
>> > >
>> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just
>> > > acquired this module :)
>> > >
>> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
>> > >
>> > > ~Danny
>> > >
>> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>
>> > > <hardware@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
>> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
>> > > >> their former users.
>> > > >
>> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by
>> > > > the
>> > > > members of this group !
>> > > >
>> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as we
>> > > > have no
>> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I
>> > > > have
>> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on
>> > > > our
>> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
>> > > > short-term
>> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to program
>> > > > such a
>> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
>> > > >
>> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
>> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
>> > > >
>> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
>> > > > discussion on a
>> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board for
>> > > > the
>> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
>> > > > cannot accuse
>> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in
>> > > > mind that
>> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3
>> > > > (8051
>> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. Even
>> > > > the
>> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
>> > > > display) limit
>> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view even
>> > > > with the
>> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
>> > > >
>> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
>> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
>> > > >
>> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
>> > > >
>> > > > Best wishes
>> > > > Dieter Doepfer
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Daniel Ornelas
>> > > danny@
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Howdy A-100 List!
Sorry for the _slow_ communications, I've been busy with life stuff! I've
gotten loading / unloading working under OS X, but there are a few kinks
that absolutely need to be worked out before I have something I can share.

I'm going to set a padded and realistic date of July 15th 2009 as the
useable release date, at which I'll make an announcement on the list.

I promise it'll be a wonderful contribution to the Doepfer continuum, just
hang tight!

Thanks,
Danny of Anadeji



On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:26 PM, achtung_999 <
heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com> wrote:

> to have this on OS X would be sweet..
> Is it anywhere near finished?
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, j_inform3r <abstract.express@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at
> > least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did everyone
> > drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software for
> > Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would happen
> > already! :)
> >
> > -John
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi John,
> >>
> >> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic
> >> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite
> >> busy at work.
> >>
> >> I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?)
> >>
> >> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version,
> with
> >> any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the
> >> next 2 weeks!
> >>
> >> Godspeed
> >> ~Danny
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
> >> > Hey guys,
> >> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for
> so
> >> > many users.
> >> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > John
> >> >
> >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Howdy,
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just
> >> > > acquired this module :)
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> >> > >
> >> > > ~Danny
> >> > >
> >> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>
> >> > > <hardware@> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> >> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> >> > > >> their former users.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > members of this group !
> >> > > >
> >> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as
> we
> >> > > > have no
> >> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I
> >> > > > have
> >> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on
> >> > > > our
> >> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
> >> > > > short-term
> >> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to
> program
> >> > > > such a
> >> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> >> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
> >> > > > discussion on a
> >> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board
> for
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
> >> > > > cannot accuse
> >> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in
> >> > > > mind that
> >> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3
> >> > > > (8051
> >> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable.
> Even
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
> >> > > > display) limit
> >> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view
> even
> >> > > > with the
> >> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> >> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Best wishes
> >> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Daniel Ornelas
> >> > > danny@
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Great!! Great this sounds really cool!

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Daniel Ornelas <danny@anadeji.com> wrote:
>
>
> Howdy A-100 List!
> Sorry for the _slow_ communications, I've been busy with life stuff! I've
> gotten loading / unloading working under OS X, but there are a few kinks
> that absolutely need to be worked out before I have something I can share.
>
> I'm going to set a padded and realistic date of July 15th 2009 as the
> useable release date, at which I'll make an announcement on the list.
>
> I promise it'll be a wonderful contribution to the Doepfer continuum, just
> hang tight!
>
> Thanks,
> Danny of Anadeji
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:26 PM, achtung_999 <
> heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> to have this on OS X would be sweet..
>> Is it anywhere near finished?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, j_inform3r <abstract.express@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at
>> > least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did everyone
>> > drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software for
>> > Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would
>> > happen
>> > already! :)
>> >
>> > -John
>> >
>> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi John,
>> >>
>> >> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic
>> >> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite
>> >> busy at work.
>> >>
>> >> I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?)
>> >>
>> >> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version,
>> with
>> >> any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the
>> >> next 2 weeks!
>> >>
>> >> Godspeed
>> >> ~Danny
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
>> >> > Hey guys,
>> >> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for
>> so
>> >> > many users.
>> >> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
>> >> >
>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >> > John
>> >> >
>> >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Howdy,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I
>> >> > > just
>> >> > > acquired this module :)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
>> >> > >
>> >> > > ~Danny
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>
>> >> > > <hardware@> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
>> >> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
>> >> > > >> their former users.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed
>> >> > > > by
>> >> > > > the
>> >> > > > members of this group !
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as
>> we
>> >> > > > have no
>> >> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I
>> >> > > > have
>> >> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on
>> >> > > > our
>> >> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
>> >> > > > short-term
>> >> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to
>> program
>> >> > > > such a
>> >> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
>> >> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
>> >> > > > discussion on a
>> >> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board
>> for
>> >> > > > the
>> >> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
>> >> > > > cannot accuse
>> >> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in
>> >> > > > mind that
>> >> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the
>> >> > > > MAQ16/3
>> >> > > > (8051
>> >> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable.
>> Even
>> >> > > > the
>> >> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
>> >> > > > display) limit
>> >> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view
>> even
>> >> > > > with the
>> >> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
>> >> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Best wishes
>> >> > > > Dieter Doepfer
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Daniel Ornelas
>> >> > > danny@
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

Wow!! Danny, I couldn't find this thread so I made a recent message. It would be a dream come true if this is released. A lot of people will REALLY appreciate it! Many thanks! In my recent message I also wanted to know if anyone has used Parallel Desktop and tried to connect to the A-112? Parallels allows seamless work between OS X and Windows.
    I've downloaded and skimmed through the docs of the Doepfer A-112 software and also Grant Richter's Move256. Seems like both apps are used hand-in-hand. Am I mistaken? I got the impression that in Move256 you can create your sounds/waveforms, and with the Doepfer app you transfer it. Am I right?
    Danny, I know it's not finished.... But how about a little teaser of what we should expect? I only recently realized the Move256 app seems quite integral to the whole process. Did you find a way to address this? Thanks again!! Maybe I'm a little crazy to get super excited over an app that transfers short 8-bit files but I can't help it!! :)

    Regards,
    John

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:

>
> Howdy A-100 List!
> Sorry for the _slow_ communications, I've been busy with life stuff! I've
> gotten loading / unloading working under OS X, but there are a few kinks
> that absolutely need to be worked out before I have something I can share.
> 
> I'm going to set a padded and realistic date of July 15th 2009 as the
> useable release date, at which I'll make an announcement on the list.
> 
> I promise it'll be a wonderful contribution to the Doepfer continuum, just
> hang tight!
> 
> Thanks,
> Danny of Anadeji
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:26 PM, achtung_999 <
> heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote:
> 
> > to have this on OS X would be sweet..
> > Is it anywhere near finished?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, j_inform3r <abstract.express@...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at
> > > least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did everyone
> > > drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software for
> > > Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would happen
> > > already! :)
> > >
> > > -John
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi John,
> > >>
> > >> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic
> > >> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite
> > >> busy at work.
> > >>
> > >> I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?)
> > >>
> > >> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version,
> > with
> > >> any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the
> > >> next 2 weeks!
> > >>
> > >> Godspeed
> > >> ~Danny
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
> > >> > Hey guys,
> > >> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for
> > so
> > >> > many users.
> > >> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
> > >> >
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> > John
> > >> >
> > >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Howdy,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just
> > >> > > acquired this module :)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ~Danny
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>
> > >> > > <hardware@> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> > >> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> > >> > > >> their former users.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > members of this group !
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as
> > we
> > >> > > > have no
> > >> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I
> > >> > > > have
> > >> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on
> > >> > > > our
> > >> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
> > >> > > > short-term
> > >> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to
> > program
> > >> > > > such a
> > >> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> > >> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
> > >> > > > discussion on a
> > >> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board
> > for
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
> > >> > > > cannot accuse
> > >> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in
> > >> > > > mind that
> > >> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3
> > >> > > > (8051
> > >> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable.
> > Even
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
> > >> > > > display) limit
> > >> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view
> > even
> > >> > > > with the
> > >> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> > >> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Best wishes
> > >> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Daniel Ornelas
> > >> > > danny@
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

How is it going with the software actually??I see today is the 16th ;-)

all the best,

Ernst



On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Daniel Ornelas <danny@anadeji.com> wrote:

>
>
> Howdy A-100 List!
> Sorry for the _slow_ communications, I've been busy with life stuff! I've
> gotten loading / unloading working under OS X, but there are a few kinks
> that absolutely need to be worked out before I have something I can share.
>
> I'm going to set a padded and realistic date of July 15th 2009 as the
> useable release date, at which I'll make an announcement on the list.
>
> I promise it'll be a wonderful contribution to the Doepfer continuum, just
> hang tight!
>
> Thanks,
> Danny of Anadeji
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:26 PM, achtung_999 <
> heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com <heinrich.himmelwasser%40gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > to have this on OS X would be sweet..
> > Is it anywhere near finished?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, j_inform3r <abstract.express@gmail.com<abstract.express%40gmail.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at
> > > least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did
> everyone
> > > drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software
> for
> > > Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would
> happen
> > > already! :)
> > >
> > > -John
> > >
> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi John,
> > >>
> > >> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic
> > >> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite
> > >> busy at work.
> > >>
> > >> I believe someone else on the list had something working also
> (anyone?)
> > >>
> > >> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version,
> > with
> > >> any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the
> > >> next 2 weeks!
> > >>
> > >> Godspeed
> > >> ~Danny
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
> > >> > Hey guys,
> > >> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful
> for
> > so
> > >> > many users.
> > >> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
> > >> >
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> > John
> > >> >
> > >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com<Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Howdy,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I
> just
> > >> > > acquired this module :)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ~Danny
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>
> > >> > > <hardware@> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> > >> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> > >> > > >> their former users.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed
> by
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > members of this group !
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as
> > we
> > >> > > > have no
> > >> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming.
> I
> > >> > > > have
> > >> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note
> on
> > >> > > > our
> > >> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
> > >> > > > short-term
> > >> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to
> > program
> > >> > > > such a
> > >> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> > >> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
> > >> > > > discussion on a
> > >> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board
> > for
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
> > >> > > > cannot accuse
> > >> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep
> in
> > >> > > > mind that
> > >> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the
> MAQ16/3
> > >> > > > (8051
> > >> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable.
> > Even
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
> > >> > > > display) limit
> > >> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view
> > even
> > >> > > > with the
> > >> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> > >> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Best wishes
> > >> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Daniel Ornelas
> > >> > > danny@
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]