Great!! Great this sounds really cool! On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Daniel Ornelas <danny@anadeji.com> wrote: > > > Howdy A-100 List! > Sorry for the _slow_ communications, I've been busy with life stuff! I've > gotten loading / unloading working under OS X, but there are a few kinks > that absolutely need to be worked out before I have something I can share. > > I'm going to set a padded and realistic date of July 15th 2009 as the > useable release date, at which I'll make an announcement on the list. > > I promise it'll be a wonderful contribution to the Doepfer continuum, just > hang tight! > > Thanks, > Danny of Anadeji > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:26 PM, achtung_999 < > heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com> wrote: > >> to have this on OS X would be sweet.. >> Is it anywhere near finished? >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, j_inform3r <abstract.express@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at >> > least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did everyone >> > drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software for >> > Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would >> > happen >> > already! :) >> > >> > -John >> > >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi John, >> >> >> >> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic >> >> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite >> >> busy at work. >> >> >> >> I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?) >> >> >> >> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version, >> with >> >> any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the >> >> next 2 weeks! >> >> >> >> Godspeed >> >> ~Danny >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote: >> >> > Hey guys, >> >> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for >> so >> >> > many users. >> >> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it? >> >> > >> >> > Best Regards, >> >> > John >> >> > >> >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > Howdy, >> >> > > >> >> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I >> >> > > just >> >> > > acquired this module :) >> >> > > >> >> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren! >> >> > > >> >> > > ~Danny >> >> > > >> >> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@> >> >> > > <hardware@> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV >> >> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping >> >> > > >> their former users. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed >> >> > > > by >> >> > > > the >> >> > > > members of this group ! >> >> > > > >> >> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as >> we >> >> > > > have no >> >> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I >> >> > > > have >> >> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on >> >> > > > our >> >> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no >> >> > > > short-term >> >> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to >> program >> >> > > > such a >> >> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job. >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome >> >> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a >> >> > > > discussion on a >> >> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board >> for >> >> > > > the >> >> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you >> >> > > > cannot accuse >> >> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in >> >> > > > mind that >> >> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the >> >> > > > MAQ16/3 >> >> > > > (8051 >> >> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable. >> Even >> >> > > > the >> >> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit >> >> > > > display) limit >> >> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view >> even >> >> > > > with the >> >> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained. >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster ( >> >> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... ) >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-) >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Best wishes >> >> > > > Dieter Doepfer >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > Daniel Ornelas >> >> > > danny@ >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: DOEPFER A-112 SAMPLER Question
2009-05-28 by achtung_999
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.