Doepfer

Howdy A-100 List!
Sorry for the _slow_ communications, I've been busy with life stuff! I've
gotten loading / unloading working under OS X, but there are a few kinks
that absolutely need to be worked out before I have something I can share.

I'm going to set a padded and realistic date of July 15th 2009 as the
useable release date, at which I'll make an announcement on the list.

I promise it'll be a wonderful contribution to the Doepfer continuum, just
hang tight!

Thanks,
Danny of Anadeji



On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:26 PM, achtung_999 <
heinrich.himmelwasser@gmail.com> wrote:

> to have this on OS X would be sweet..
> Is it anywhere near finished?
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:39 PM, j_inform3r <abstract.express@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So has the A-112 program been ported to OS X yet? I've been away for at
> > least over a year so I figured there would be something. Or did everyone
> > drop the ball on this one? Am I the ONLY one who wants this software for
> > Mac? If I could program I would do it. Just wish it would it would happen
> > already! :)
> >
> > -John
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi John,
> >>
> >> I was just working on it last night actually, I've got the basic
> >> transmission in and out worked out, I've just been quite
> >> busy at work.
> >>
> >> I believe someone else on the list had something working also (anyone?)
> >>
> >> At any rate, I want to get as close as I can to the Windows version,
> with
> >> any luck (and time) i'll have it posted in the
> >> next 2 weeks!
> >>
> >> Godspeed
> >> ~Danny
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:04:33PM -0000, j_inform3r wrote:
> >> > Hey guys,
> >> > Whatever happened to the A-112 OS X editor? It would be SO useful for
> so
> >> > many users.
> >> > Danny, do you still plan on going through with it?
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > John
> >> >
> >> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ornelas <danny@> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Howdy,
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm handy with C/C++ and Cocoa, i'd happily do it for free as I just
> >> > > acquired this module :)
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, I'd work for free, for the benefit of all A-100 brethren!
> >> > >
> >> > > ~Danny
> >> > >
> >> > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:54 AM, <hardware@>
> >> > > <hardware@> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >> Doepfer has been relaeasing totally useless modules as CV
> >> > > >> whatever or cloning existing vintage modules instead of helping
> >> > > >> their former users.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Most of these useless modules have been suggested and discussed by
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > members of this group !
> >> > > >
> >> > > > We never promised to have available Mac based editor programs as
> we
> >> > > > have no
> >> > > > programmer in the company who is familiar with Mac programming. I
> >> > > > have
> >> > > > mentioned this several times and there is a corresponding note on
> >> > > > our
> >> > > > website too. I understand that this is a drawback but I have no
> >> > > > short-term
> >> > > > solution. If there is somebody in this group who is able to
> program
> >> > > > such a
> >> > > > software I'd be happy to pay him for this job.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Same with MAQ 16/3 that with a newer OS could be an awesome
> >> > > >> machine instead of a decorative item.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If you tell me what you are missing we could try to start a
> >> > > > discussion on a
> >> > > > civilized base. We have already developed an improved main board
> for
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > MAQ16/3 (with more memory and CV/Gate outputs). So I think you
> >> > > > cannot accuse
> >> > > > us that there is no support for older devices. But please keep in
> >> > > > mind that
> >> > > > there are limitation due to the microprocessor used in the MAQ16/3
> >> > > > (8051
> >> > > > derivate) and not everything is possible that may be desirable.
> Even
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > available controls (only 8 buttons with LEDs and the 3-digit
> >> > > > display) limit
> >> > > > the possibilities for a software update. From my point of view
> even
> >> > > > with the
> >> > > > current software the controls are already a bit overstrained.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> I think now that Doepfer is UNABLE to develope even a toaster (
> >> > > >> What about a CV toaster,perhaps is more " Doepfer style..... )
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Excellent idea. How about a poll ;-)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Best wishes
> >> > > > Dieter Doepfer
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Daniel Ornelas
> >> > > danny@
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]